• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:117]Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

Bolded = And of course, those on the left are so courteous and respective of those of us on the right - particularly LEADERS off the left. :roll:
I can't speak to any specific Dems, but I can tell you Trump treats us like ****. Look at his name-calling of his ex-mistress, for one.
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

I can't speak to any specific Dems, but I can tell you Trump treats us like ****. Look at his name-calling of his ex-mistress, for one.
LOL, those are words of affection compared to some of the things Dems call those of us on the right.
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

It's unfortunate that "nationalism" have acquired such a tainted and negative connotation. Pride in one's nation is not a bad thing. And placing the interest of one's nation in a superior position to those of the "world community" is not bad either. The problem, IMHO, is when certain people for there own purposes try to mix in racial or ethnic undertones into their interpretations. Also, I am not a backer of the "my country, right or wrong" unless it's followed by "when it's right I support it, when it's wrong I work to correct it".
Good comment. :thumbs:

Patriotism is fine, national pride is fine, but nationalism tends to go extreme, and history is replete with tragic examples. Nationalism commonly doesn't mean uniting a nation, but rather involves a segment of a nation declaring themselves pure, and subsequently oppressing or rejecting those citizens they believe are not pure.

I think Trump is more polarizing because he didn't come up through the politician minor leagues and learn all the double talk, and dissembling, and the ability to say a lot of words with out saying anything meaningful. And he's not part of the "go along to get along" good ol' boys network. Unlike most of them he doesn't hide his self-aggrandizement and boastfulness. And, of course, his every faux pas and misstatement receives instantaneous world wide coverage from a media that is 90+ percent opposed to him.
But this is only part of the story. The larger part is Trump attacks and antagonizes American citizens that oppose him or do not support his political agenda. He polarizes intentionally & purposefully.
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

LOL, those are words of affection compared to some of the things Dems call those of us on the right.
Justify it as you wish, but I see nothing funny about it.
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

Good comment. :thumbs:

Patriotism is fine, national pride is fine, but nationalism tends to go extreme, and history is replete with tragic examples. Nationalism commonly doesn't mean uniting a nation, but rather involves a segment of a nation declaring themselves pure, and subsequently oppressing or rejecting those citizens they believe are not pure.
Yeah, that's the connotation vs denotation thing I was pointing out

Chomsky said:
But this is only part of the story. The larger part is Trump attacks and antagonizes American citizens that oppose him or do not support his political agenda. He polarizes intentionally & purposefully.
Yeah, we bible/gun clinging racist, homophobic, misogynist Trumpkins and assorted deplorables never get attacked or antagonized intentionally.
 
Last edited:
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

Justify it as you wish, but I see nothing funny about it.
Sometimes laughing is the only thing that keeps me from screaming. I find talking to you interesting and rewarding but I have to say complaining about how Trump speaks of you guys while your leaders spew that same or worse garage at the right is a bit disingenuous.
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

So you support unions who break the law? what did you expect Reagan to do about PATCO? he gave them fair notice, two days to return to work, they refused. If the law specfically says public workers can't strike and they go strike, and hold up billions in international commerce and put the very safety of the traveling public at risk, that needs to be addressed. PATCO endorsed Reagan in 80, he didn't want to break them up, but when they put him against the wall what choice did he have?
The PATCO incident is not as clear-cut as you portray it. Reagan never negotiated in anything near good faith. He didn't even meet the workers 10% of the way. And in the end, it cost the government far more in training and rehiring than it would have if the government gave the workers everything they initially requested, much less met them in the middle. Also, the system limped along in a reduced capacity for most of a year, and the toll on the industry and economy was huge. So who won, here?

The war on drugs ramped up because American cities had become shells of their former selves, you had cities with dozens of murders in a night.

People who blame this stuff on Reagan just like to make points, but they never really explain what they would've done in the same situation.
Reagan indeed made the War on Drugs much of the disaster it is today. It's why you can't move your legal cash through a bank without government notice and surveillance, why your 14th Amendment rights have been abrogated by telling you a dog got excited, and why the police can take your money if they stop you for a traffic stop.

You've got to be crazy to give up your constitutional rights for this charade. And I can't believe you'd try to justify this abomination. The WoD does more harm than the drugs themselves. And before you try to convince me prosecuting the WoD in this manner is the only way to curtail the harm from drugs, do some research on the results Portugal got when they decriminalized all personal drug use in 2001. It was a tremendous success. Here's a link to get you started:

(Wiki) Drug policy of Portugal
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

Lead WHAT to Trump? A perfectly legal NDA that she broke, and is now LIABLE FOR?

She's appearing in skeazy, skank hole strip joints to make ends meet, and will now be liable for the LEGAL COSTS of the case just thrown out.

That's not my definition of "not doing half bad, to be honest"...BY A LONG SHOT.

For an NDA to be valid, it has to be signed by both parties. It wasn't. I wonder what part of that fact you don't get?
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

Sometimes laughing is the only thing that keeps me from screaming. I find talking to you interesting and rewarding but I have to say complaining about how Trump speaks of you guys while your leaders spew that same or worse garage at the right is a bit disingenuous.
Alright Bullseye, fair enough. Yeah, I enjoy our discussions too.

I don't like any politcos talking and acting like that, but the President is in a special class. He's the most powerful man in the world, and his words carry great weight. I see his screwing with people as an abuse of the Office, to say nothing of it being unbecoming & un-Presidential.
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

Alright Bullseye, fair enough. Yeah, I enjoy our discussions too.

I don't like any politcos talking and acting like that, but the President is in a special class. He's the most powerful man in the world, and his words carry great weight. I see his screwing with people as an abuse of the Office, to say nothing of it being unbecoming & un-Presidential.
I understand your objections. I've said many times I find him obnoxious and uncouth but the Constitution has no requirement for polite polished behavior. Believe me I wish he'd just STFU sometimes. I think he hurts his own effectiveness with his behavior at times but I don't think a sea change in his demeanor is on the radar.
 
Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

The PATCO incident is not as clear-cut as you portray it. Reagan never negotiated in anything near good faith. He didn't even meet the workers 10% of the way. And in the end, it cost the government far more in training and rehiring than it would have if the government gave the workers everything they initially requested, much less met them in the middle. Also, the system limped along in a reduced capacity for most of a year, and the toll on the industry and economy was huge. So who won, here?

Reagan indeed made the War on Drugs much of the disaster it is today. It's why you can't move your legal cash through a bank without government notice and surveillance, why your 14th Amendment rights have been abrogated by telling you a dog got excited, and why the police can take your money if they stop you for a traffic stop.

You've got to be crazy to give up your constitutional rights for this charade. And I can't believe you'd try to justify this abomination. The WoD does more harm than the drugs themselves. And before you try to convince me prosecuting the WoD in this manner is the only way to curtail the harm from drugs, do some research on the results Portugal got when they decriminalized all personal drug use in 2001. It was a tremendous success. Here's a link to get you started:

(Wiki) Drug policy of Portugal

So if the government wasn’t willing to pay Air Traffic Controllers what they were worth then the ATCs could’ve quit and went to work doing something else, or if ATC was privatized then the ATCs would get what the market wage for their service is. The law doesn’t say “you shall not strike unless the government won’t give you what you want” it says “you shall not strike” period. So the ATCs went on strike in direct violation of the law, yes it costs more money to use strong leadership then give in, well in one time it does, but the precedent the administration won’t enforce the law means that every public union will strike every time their exact demands aren’t met.

So what would you have done as president? Just allow PATCO to break the law without consequence? If they weren’t fired then he would be the equivalent of s parent who buys their kids a candy bar to stave off a tantrum

As it stands now federal workers are way overpaid, we would be collapsing like Brazil right now if Reagan didn’t put his foot down

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

For an NDA to be valid, it has to be signed by both parties. It wasn't. I wonder what part of that fact you don't get?

It was. And witnessed by BOTH PARTY's counsel. I don't know what part of that fact you don't get?


Stop buying Mouthenatti's bull****.

I'll bet the BJ Queen wishes she had...


The Legality of Using an Alias


https://court.laws.com/alias
 
Last edited:
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

Back to this post...:)

<edited to meet post size limit>

Anyway, just a few thoughts.
Wow Trix, thanks for all the effort you put here. I'm surely not worth it! ;)

I edited your post to meet the forum size limit, but left the attribution line so others can link-back to your original post.

I'll just touch on some of your topics:

Yeah, I too was a cradle-Dem. Born into it, in a family and neighborhood that was part of the old Democratic Machine. At various times in my life I was active in street-level precinct work for the ward-office (a constant), assisted several unions, worked as part of an independent mercenary city-wide organization, worked directly for several candidates, and even organized and led a small neighborhood voting bloc to assure my family & my neighbors were taken care of properly by the ward office.

I did the above for personal interests, with some of my family & friends being on the City and County payrolls, and my family & neighbors needing city services that came through the ward office. My work with our neighborhood bloc was the most rewarding though, and of all the political work it is that which gives me the most pride. Most of the rest sucked for the most part, and was purely transactional on my part. I was not a 'true believer' or a 'man with a cause', but rather I worked to improve my lot and that of my family and neighbors. But I will admit I absolutely loved the buzz on election day, watching my neighbors coming in to vote as promised, and then watching the returns flow-in later that night in the ward hall or at candidate's parties. There's no buzz like it, and it made me a lifetime political junkie.

I never pursued a city or county job even with multiple offers on the table though, but instead opted for a university education and corporate life. I wanted to have the option to be independent of politics, and to have the freedom to geographically move about - which I eventually did. However I did get tired of corporate life too, later on. I then found the ultimate independence in working for myself and assisting my wife in her professional business venture.

Once I left the city and the politics, I left the Dems and never reconnected until just now. I no longer had any need for party affiliation outside the city, but still preferred Dem Presidential, Senate, and Congressional candidates, mostly due to policy. Unlike yourself, I like Obama - a lot! So much so I took my kid down to see him in Grant Park on his election night. But the Dem Party as a whole had left me, and had left me for a long time. I couldn't stand Hillary. And Trump disgusted me even more. It really was a hold-your-nose-and-vote election.

The whole big-city Dem experience led me to dislike the local politicians I came to be in the presence of over the years. In person they are cold & fake, and quite honesty they have a sort of scary cut-throat way about them. Lie to your face with a smile, and stab you in the back quietly. Scum. Pure scum. My work with the unions has led me to still be a staunch supporter of unions in private industry, but not in public service. In fact, I saw enough that I am dead-set against public service unions. The ones I saw were abusive, in my opinion.

Anyway, thanks for sharing your thoughts. And thanks even more, for allowing me to share mine and my perspective.
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

Yeah, that's the connotation vs denotation thing I was pointing out

Yeah, we bible/gun clinging racist, homophobic, misogynist Trumpkins and assorted deplorables never get attacked or antagonized intentionally.
It's far matter of degree though. Yeah Hillary sucks, I won't disagree. But Obama, despite his only one - that I know of - private guns & Bibles comment, never spoke or acted like that as President. Never, that I saw.

But the point is, why do we accept this **** at all? From any pol? Obviously, the voters want it. Which is bull****, but true for at least some.
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

Wow Trix, thanks for all the effort you put here. I'm surely not worth it! ;)

I edited your post to meet the forum size limit, but left the attribution line so others can link-back to your original post.

I'll just touch on some of your topics:

Yeah, I too was a cradle-Dem. Born into it, in a family and neighborhood that was part of the old Democratic Machine. At various times in my life I was active in street-level precinct work for the ward-office (a constant), assisted several unions, worked as part of an independent mercenary city-wide organization, worked directly for several candidates, and even organized and led a small neighborhood voting bloc to assure my family & my neighbors were taken care of properly by the ward office.

I did the above for personal interests, with some of my family & friends being on the City and County payrolls, and my family & neighbors needing city services that came through the ward office. My work with our neighborhood bloc was the most rewarding though, and of all the political work it is that which gives me the most pride. Most of the rest sucked for the most part, and was purely transactional on my part. I was not a 'true believer' or a 'man with a cause', but rather I worked to improve my lot and that of my family and neighbors. But I will admit I absolutely loved the buzz on election day, watching my neighbors coming in to vote as promised, and then watching the returns flow-in later that night in the ward hall or at candidate's parties. There's no buzz like it, and it made me a lifetime political junkie.

I never pursued a city or county job even with multiple offers on the table though, but instead opted for a university education and corporate life. I wanted to have the option to be independent of politics, and to have the freedom to geographically move about - which I eventually did. However I did get tired of corporate life too, later on. I then found the ultimate independence in working for myself and assisting my wife in her professional business venture.

Once I left the city and the politics, I left the Dems and never reconnected until just now. I no longer had any need for party affiliation outside the city, but still preferred Dem Presidential, Senate, and Congressional candidates, mostly due to policy. Unlike yourself, I like Obama - a lot! So much so I took my kid down to see him in Grant Park on his election night. But the Dem Party as a whole had left me, and had left me for a long time. I couldn't stand Hillary. And Trump disgusted me even more. It really was a hold-your-nose-and-vote election.

The whole big-city Dem experience led me to dislike the local politicians I came to be in the presence of over the years. In person they are cold & fake, and quite honesty they have a sort of scary cut-throat way about them. Lie to your face with a smile, and stab you in the back quietly. Scum. Pure scum. My work with the unions has led me to still be a staunch supporter of unions in private industry, but not in public service. In fact, I saw enough that I am dead-set against public service unions. The ones I saw were abusive, in my opinion.

Anyway, thanks for sharing your thoughts. And thanks even more, for allowing me to share mine and my perspective.

Again, I am blown away by your comments and will take my time and respond tomorrow morning or so, when I believe I am at my best.
Respectfully, Trix
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

So if the government wasn’t willing to pay Air Traffic Controllers what they were worth then the ATCs could’ve quit and went to work doing something else, or if ATC was privatized then the ATCs would get what the market wage for their service is. The law doesn’t say “you shall not strike unless the government won’t give you what you want” it says “you shall not strike” period. So the ATCs went on strike in direct violation of the law, yes it costs more money to use strong leadership then give in, well in one time it does, but the precedent the administration won’t enforce the law means that every public union will strike every time their exact demands aren’t met.
Despite the preclusion of striking, there were dozens if not more public service strikes over the years. There's transit strikes all the time, along with Blue Flue cop strikes. I'm not going to justify it, but it's not uncommon.

So what would you have done as president? Just allow PATCO to break the law without consequence? If they weren’t fired then he would be the equivalent of s parent who buys their kids a candy bar to stave off a tantrum
Reagan should have negotiated in good faith. Like I said, he didn't even meet them part way. He basically said, screw you. And remember, much of what the controllers wanted was changes in the name of safety & efficiency, which the government eventually did anyway with the new controllers!

As it stands now federal workers are way overpaid, we would be collapsing like Brazil right now if Reagan didn’t put his foot down

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ah, now we're getting somewhere. I agree! I was lamenting what Reagan did to PATCO, because that was the precipice that began the break-up of unions in private industry. I'm a strong supporter of private unions, but I do not believe unions belong in public service. I'm with you there.
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

Moderator's Warning:
Stop with the personal commentary and stick to the topic folks.
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

I hear Avenatti's getting ready to claim he's 1/2048th Cherokee so the ticket can count on the Native American vote.

:lamo
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

Again, I am blown away by your comments and will take my time and respond tomorrow morning or so, when I believe I am at my best.
Respectfully, Trix
Don't let my wall of Text push you in a corner, Trix. Respond if and when you'd like, to whatever degree you wish, or even not at all. Either way, I enjoyed your story.

I do like stories of those that change parties or leans, though. I'm a big fan of Charles Krauthammer, and recently got his book of essays that chronicles his years of changing from a liberal to a conservative. I'm expecting it to be a great read.
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

My personal opinion on this is that Stormy is winning. Even if she pays Lyin' Don's legal fees, her charge to the strip clubs for an appearance is 4X what it was before she was in the news. It's all about the money IMO, and she's cleaning up. Book deal, check. As long as Avenatti keeps her in the news, and her revenue stays up above the expenses incurred to keep her in the news, she's winning, and she likes it.
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

My personal opinion on this is that Stormy is winning. Even if she pays Lyin' Don's legal fees, her charge to the strip clubs for an appearance is 4X what it was before she was in the news. It's all about the money IMO, and she's cleaning up. Book deal, check. As long as Avenatti keeps her in the news, and her revenue stays up above the expenses incurred to keep her in the news, she's winning, and she likes it.

Mouthenatti is in the hole for $10 mil+, the Blowjob Queen will be on the hook for Trump's legal fees , as well as the financial liability she AGREED TO IN A LEGAL CONTRACT SHE BROKE, thanks to Mouthenatti.

Please list your source for her slimy strip club earnings..which AIN'T MUCH.


The "novelty" has worn off, and HER AGE and TOUGH WEAR, IS SHOWING, BIGTIME.

Yeah..."winning"... :lamo
 
Re: Judge tosses Stormy Daniels' defamation suit against Trump

Mouthenatti creepy.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom