What if Venezuela succeeds in getting majority support though control of the media, mass-exile, murder and repression? One could technically say that the repression is by consent of the majority and fostered through democracy. Should the international community support such a popularly elected government? Why or why not?
What you risk is hypocrisy in the determination of what is and is not authoritarian control of the people via media control, repression, murder, etc.
This is more or less the method of operation in China, and despite the “trade war” is still one of our largest trading partners with seemingly no real rush to change the nation away from their style of governance. Besides, no one seems to be in much of a rush to harm the release schedule of the next iPhone.
This is also more or less the method of operation in Saudi Arabia, and despite the current news over this reporter there is no real interest in dropping a bomb on the international movement of oil.
Turkey is not all that different, or Iraq (we can pretend things are all humanitarian over there but it is far from the truth,) or Afghanistan, or Egypt, or dozens of other nations we engage on some level when it benefits western nations. All of which have their own means to control the people, the media, rights, etc.
So to isolate Venezuela (or Cuba for that matter) reveals our own diplomatic hypocrisy in dealing with nations, including how “international community support” for trade and/or other national interests ends up explained.
Everyone knows the goal of “conservatives” is to bash on Venezuela for their left leaning economic failures, but all the while we ignore right leaning totaltarian nations saying little to nothing about how those nations engage in controlling their own people.