• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:51]Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warran

Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

Moderator's Warning:
This thread is not about Kavanaugh or his accusers. This thread is about the FBI and the investigation into Trump. Stick to the topic folks.
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

MovingPictures said:
I'm so tired of having to explain how the FISA warrants weren't based off of just the Dossier, to a point I'm not going to repeat myself any longer.
Click to expand...
Have they provided any of the information that the fisa request was based on?

I don't see how either side can say for sure either way without seeing the documents that have not been released yet.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

MSgt said:
The entire world knows that polygraphs are inadmissible in courts. Yet, the authorities still consistently use them because they know that they contribute to a truth that helps to legitimize or de-legitimize a witness prior to court hearings. It also helps investigators narrow down some probable truths in order to guide investigations.

I'm still hung up on the fact that Kavanaugh will not take one, especially since he is sure that this didn't happen.
Click to expand...

Yip, even if he does not remember and is clinging to that, he most likely still thinks that it is a possibility considering his life style it very well could have happened.

I'm sure his lawyers have told him that with that doubt in his mind he should never submit to one...
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

bubbabgone said:
Tell us who edited that wikipedia entry that you quoted. You know, the reference numbers 3 and 4? The references you truncated in your quote.
By the way, you do know that anybody could edit anything in wikipedia with anything.
I guess you didn't.
It's really up to the reader to further verify it realizing it could itself very well be biased opinion.
You didn't do that, did you.
Click to expand...

His pushing of the Plutonium One conspiracy theory backs the statement that he's a hack conspiracy theorist. And this "breaking news" thread based on an opinion piece belongs in the CT or the general politics forum.
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

Cardinal said:
His pushing of the Plutonium One conspiracy theory backs the statement that he's a hack conspiracy theorist. And this "breaking news" thread based on an opinion piece belongs in the CT or the general politics forum.
Click to expand...

And you posted the opinion of 2 anti-trumpers to counter what you called his opinion piece.
Did you bother to check who they were?
Solomon is an opinion contributor to The Hill but he's also a reporter.
The piece was not posted there as an opinion piece.
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

bubbabgone said:
And you posted the opinion of 2 anti-trumpers to counter what you called his opinion piece.
Did you bother to check who they were?
Solomon is an opinion contributor to The Hill but he's also a reporter.
The piece was not posted there as an opinion piece.
Click to expand...

And yet it was still an opinion piece by a conspiracy theorist, validating the Wiki entry.
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

Cardinal said:
And yet it was still an opinion piece by a conspiracy theorist, validating the Wiki entry.
Click to expand...

who said it was an opinion piece?
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

bubbabgone said:
who said it was an opinion piece?
Click to expand...

I did, because it is. And he's a conspiracy theorist.
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

bubbabgone said:
who said it was an opinion piece?
Click to expand...

I just noticed that this thread is in the general political discussion forum, so obviously the mods agreed.
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

Cardinal said:
I did, because it is. And he's a conspiracy theorist.
Click to expand...

Oh. Because you said so.
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

bubbabgone said:
Oh. Because you said so.
Click to expand...

Look at the forum we're in now. The mods agreed that the Solomon article was an opinion piece.

I also notice you trying to pretend to ignore that Solomon is a conspiracy theorist.

I would also just like to add that The Hill is highly irresponsible for not labeling the article an opinion piece. A more respectable news outlet is careful to label opinion pieces as "opinion" or "analysis." They tried to muddy the waters by calling Solomon an "opinion contributor," adding an air of ambiguity, but it was a rather shoddy attempt.
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

bubbabgone said:
Tell us who edited that wikipedia entry that you quoted. You know, the reference numbers 3 and 4? The references you truncated in your quote.
By the way, you do know that anybody could edit anything in wikipedia with anything.
I guess you didn't.
It's really up to the reader to further verify it realizing it could itself very well be biased opinion.
You didn't do that, did you.
Click to expand...

It appears the answer is no, he didn't.
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

Cardinal said:
Look at the forum we're in now. The mods agreed that the Solomon article was an opinion piece.
Click to expand...
By what definition does that make it an opinion piece?
If it's CT why not move it to the CT forum?

also notice you trying to pretend to ignore that Solomon is a conspiracy theorist.
Click to expand...

I didn't ignore it I just figured you weren't very well informed about the subject so I let it go.

I would also just like to add that The Hill is highly irresponsible for not labeling the article an opinion piece. A more respectable news outlet is careful to label opinion pieces as "opinion" or "analysis."
Click to expand...
Yeah that nasty Hill is a rightwing front.
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

bubbabgone said:
By what definition does that make it an opinion piece?
If it's CT why not move it to the CT forum?
Click to expand...

I don't know why the mods have been loathe to move so many deserving threads into the CT forum of late, but moving this opinion piece into general politics is next best.

bubbabgone said:
I didn't ignore it I just figured you weren't very well informed about the subject so I let it go.
Click to expand...

Oh, so you're a Uranium One conspiracy theorist too, eh? No wonder you're defending this guy.

bubbabgone said:
Yeah that nasty Hill is a rightwing front.
Click to expand...

Nonresponsive. Is it general protocol in respected news outlets to label articles so as to be clear whether it's news or opinion? The Hill does neither.
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

In the top credit Solomon is listed as a opinion contributor...
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

Cardinal said:
I don't know why the mods have been loathe to move so many deserving threads into the CT forum of late, but moving this opinion piece into general politics is next best.
Click to expand...
right ... nasty right wing mods.
You just can't help yourself, can you.

Oh, so you're a Uranium One conspiracy theorist too, eh? No wonder you're defending this guy.
Click to expand...
Well, apparently I do know more about it than you. I realize you're not inclined to learn more about it because you're not inclined to want to know more. It's that whole comfort zone thing.

Nonresponsive. Is it general protocol in respected news outlets to label articles so as to be clear whether it's news or opinion? The Hill does neither.
Click to expand...
The Hill has an opinion section and this wasn't in it.
Therefore ...
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

GDViking said:
In the top credit Solomon is listed as a opinion contributor...
Click to expand...
number 55
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

MSgt said:
The one where a false student was being pushed forward to discredit, the one where FOX News tried to get the former FBI agent who administered the test to discredit, and the one who is a widely-published university professor who has everything to lose by "lying." But here we are adding to the nonsense by simply defaulting to discrediting the Polygraph all together on the grounds that her job is to teach people to lie and pass lie detectors.

If this was just a game, the DNC would have found a truck-stop waitress with nothing to lose. This is not about picking a side so that we can be "winners" of a game. Nor is this about injecting ourselves into Kavanaugh's position and pretending that we wouldn't want to be accused of such things.
Click to expand...

OH yeah, its the same one where there isn't one single god damn corroborating witness, not even the ones she calls out by name, I know that one!


Then you simply don't know the level of depravity the DNC is capable of. You're right it's not about picking a side, it's about innocent until proven guilty. It's remarkable how you so fluidly accuse the the GOP and its supporters through implication that what the pathetic Unthinking Left have been doing from the outset.
 
Re: Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant

GDViking said:
Still clinging to that debunked bs are you???
Click to expand...

:shock:

Oh that's right, it's one of those "that's the way it is cuz I said so" moments...

Gotcha :thumbs:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom