• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Women of the Right vs the Left

PleasantValley said:
You have no idea how many YOUNG women of all races would kick your ass for saying such a sexist thing like that?
Click to expand...

Why? It's exactly what the "good book" tells them to do.

Do they just get mad when someone rubs their nose in it?
 
PleasantValley said:
You have no idea how many YOUNG women of all races would kick your ass for saying such a sexist thing like that?
Click to expand...

The average woman to the right today is far less to the right than women in their 30's and 40's during the 1960's and 1970's.
 
PleasantValley said:
A woman "standing by her man" does not make her weak.
Where do you get this crap from?

Ooops...my mistake. I promised myself to not feed you anymore.
Click to expand...


LOL, yeah, you ought to stop. I am getting fat on your jabber.

Do I really need explain this to you though?

Plus I kinda already did.

No judgement but the accepted definition of being strong is to stand up for oneself and if need be by oneself.

A women "standing behind her man" has adapted a survival strategy of subservience, not standing up for oneself.

It's a better survival skill than standing alone or being the lead protectorate but it most certainly is by definition
"weak."

Now if you want to change the popularly accepted definitions of weak and strong....

Hope this helps!

You have any alka seltzer?

 
noonereal said:
LOL, yeah, you ought to stop. I am getting fat on your jabber.

Do I really need explain this to you though?

Plus I kinda already did.

No judgement but the accepted definition of being strong is to stand up for oneself and if need be by oneself.

A women "standing behind her man" has adapted a survival strategy of subservience, not standing up for oneself.

It's a better survival skill than standing alone or being the lead protectorate but it most certainly is by definition
"weak."

Now if you want to change the popularly accepted definitions of weak and strong....

Hope this helps!

You have any alka seltzer?

Click to expand...


Republicans changing common definitions to suit their silly beliefs? Shocking.
 
Spartacus FPV said:
Why? They certainly don't care about women. They didn't "believe" Bill Clinton's victims like Juanita Broadrick. Paula Jones had SIX contemporaneous witnesses.

The left pretends to care about their pet protected voting blocks, but if they #Walkaway they get the Kanye treatment.

Just look at this, then dare prattle to me about the left's respect for women:
View attachment 67241578
Click to expand...

This is a false story put out by the party who's led by a pathological liar. Is it any wonder that the people who find that acceptable are so gullible that they can be manipulated by whatever lie they're fed?!?

Karen Monahan
@KarenMonahan01

This picture is NOT me. Please do not share with any connection to me or my story. Please honor this ladies wounds, pain and trauma. Thank you. https://twitter.com/Rugerbymyside/status/1043517509830234114 …

8:13 AM - Sep 22, 2018
3,679
2,537 people are talking about this
 
calamity said:
Republicans changing common definitions to suit their silly beliefs? Shocking.
Click to expand...

she can't help it (low IQ)

speaks from emotion not reason

no choice so I feel no malice
 
SoCal said:
This is a false story put out by the party who's led by a pathological liar. Is it any wonder that the people who find that acceptable are so gullible that they can be manipulated by whatever lie they're fed?!?

Karen Monahan
@KarenMonahan01

This picture is NOT me. Please do not share with any connection to me or my story. Please honor this ladies wounds, pain and trauma. Thank you. https://twitter.com/Rugerbymyside/status/1043517509830234114 …

8:13 AM - Sep 22, 2018
3,679
2,537 people are talking about this
Click to expand...

False image maybe, her story is still legit. Cant tell because I clicked your link and got "Sorry, that page doesn’t exist!" from Twitter.
 
Spartacus FPV said:
False image maybe, her story is still legit. Cant tell because I clicked your link and got "Sorry, that page doesn’t exist!" from Twitter.
Click to expand...

The Tweet was a copy and past from the Snopes site. I've heard that conservatives now believe Snopes is a vast leftwing conspiracy.

I suppose it's easy to buy lies and falsehoods when you live in the world of Fox news, fear of the 'Deep State', our FBI, our media and our immigrants...
 
Hawkeye10 said:
Those woke women tend to be deeply unhappy people, you do know this right? It is not at all clear that the victim culture promoters who warn them off of men, who teach them to blame men for everything, are doing them any favors.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure that while it makes you happy to believe that, your fantasy is not founded in reality.
 
noonereal said:
Insecure men do.

I was always attracted to intelligent women. My buddy, back in high school, shocked me one day when he told me how he liked this girl because she was stupid. He was dead serious.

I pondered this and realized he felt unthreatened in such a relationship which of course feels like security, a primal want satiated.
Click to expand...

It's unfounded in reality and also socially unacceptable to be racist, so the only ones left to 'put down' publicly still are women. Somehow, men seem to still get away with trying to imply that women are lesser than men. (weak, deluded, unable to control their own lives and happiness, etc)

But when you have men of low status and/or low self-esteem, they need to find some group to be 'better than.' This then makes them feel superior. And then they can also blame their deficiencies on the other group taking opportunities and respect away from them 'unfairly.'
 
Lursa said:
It's unfounded in reality and also socially unacceptable to be racist, so the only ones left to 'put down' publicly still are women. Somehow, men seem to still get away with trying to imply that women are lesser than men. (weak, deluded, unable to control their own lives and happiness, etc)

But when you have men of low status and/or low self-esteem, they need to find some group to be 'better than.' This then makes them feel superior. And then they can also blame their deficiencies on the other group taking opportunities and respect away from them 'unfairly.'
Click to expand...

A wise man knows that he is ruled by his want of sex and that in and of itself puts women in the dominate position.
 
calamity said:
Basically, when you parse the words of Sarah Palin, Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin or the few dozen other female voices of the Right, one thing stands out. They parrot the men. These women promote the patriarchy's belief systems. They are not their own women. Look at Fox. It's bubble headed bleach blondes are us. They sit on the couch and bob their heads while teh menz speak.

Now, turn your head to the Left. When we listen to Kamala Harris, Rachael Maddow, Asha Rangappa or even Chelsea Clinton we see and hear from these women almost the exact opposite of what we've seen on the Right. On the Left we see women who are themselves: no tight dresses and fake smiles on make-up gobbed faces. We also hear female voices which lead by their own direction; not voices which parrot teh menz. These women project their own ideas with their voices. And, I bet that scares a lot of men.

So, to me, it makes sense that the men on the Right wants to define those who parrot them as the "real feminists." And, it also explains why they absolutely hate the females on the left--those who will not be tamed.

Well, give me 100 Kamala Harris types, any day. No wonder the Democrats are now represented by so many women. It's the only party where women can be themselves.
Click to expand...

I just heard that Sen Collins will vote to Kavanaugh. She kept citing "special interest groups".

I guess you can rationalize the approval of someone who clearly lacks the temperament for the job if you believe women are a 'special interest'...
 
SoCal said:
I just heard that Sen Collins will vote to Kavanaugh. She kept citing "special interest groups".

I guess you can rationalize the approval of someone who clearly lacks the temperament for the job if you believe women are a 'special interest'...
Click to expand...

Collins is a great example of Republican women. Followers, meek, never one to speak up against the boys club.

GOP has six female US Senators. Except for Collins and Murkowsk, people would be hard pressed to name any of them off the top of their head. Dems have seventeen, I can rattle off ten without even breaking a sweat: Feinstein, Harris, McCaskill, Heidcamp, Stabnow, Duckworth, Warren, Tammy, Hassan and that Hawaiian lady whose name Begins with an H.

I see I missed two obvious ones: Klobucher and Gillibrand. Both are more famous than all six Republican females combined. Why? Because they speak up. Republican women know their place; behind teh menz.
 
calamity said:
Collins is a great example of Republican women. Followers, meek, never one to speak up against the boys club.

GOP has six female US Senators. Except for Collins and Murkowsk, people would be hard pressed to name any of them off the top of their head. Dems have seventeen, I can rattle off ten without even breaking a sweat: Feinstein, Harris, McCaskill, Heidcamp, Stabnow, Duckworth, Warren, Tammy, Hassan and that Hawaiian lady whose name Begins with an H.

I see I missed two obvious ones: Klobucher and Gillibrand. Both are more famous than all six Republican females combined. Why? Because they speak up. Republican women know their place; behind teh menz.
Click to expand...

The hatchet job attempted against Kavanaugh was shameful and the sex of some of hatcheteers will not protect them from the opprobrium due to them. Yes, that means you Feinstein, Harris, Gillibrand and Hirono. The mob justice they tried to ram through was, thankfully, rejected. They were no friends to Ford, either, despite their claims. Ford was merely a tool for them.

Collins had more erudition and intelligence today than any Democrat has mustered in years.
 
Left: 3 of 4 SCOTUS judges are female

Right: 2 of the 5 males are sex abusers.
 
veritas1 said:
The hatchet job attempted against Kavanaugh was shameful and the sex of some of hatcheteers will not protect them from the opprobrium due to them. Yes, that means you Feinstein, Harris, Gillibrand and Hirono. The mob justice they tried to ram through was, thankfully, rejected. They were no friends to Ford, either, despite their claims. Ford was merely a tool for them.

Collins had more erudition and intelligence today than any Democrat has mustered in years.
Click to expand...

You mean she said what the men on the Right wanted to hear. Yes. That’s true.
 
“White women, who enjoy proximal power from their association with white men, have often served as the white patriarchy’s most eager foot soldiers,” @rtraister

https://twitter.com/shannonrwatts/status/1048305283582156803
Click to expand...

DoxUELDVAAA-N2b.jpg
 
calamity said:
Basically, when you parse the words of Sarah Palin, Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin or the few dozen other female voices of the Right, one thing stands out. They parrot the men. These women promote the patriarchy's belief systems. They are not their own women. Look at Fox. It's bubble headed bleach blondes are us. They sit on the couch and bob their heads while teh menz speak.

Now, turn your head to the Left. When we listen to Kamala Harris, Rachael Maddow, Asha Rangappa or even Chelsea Clinton we see and hear from these women almost the exact opposite of what we've seen on the Right. On the Left we see women who are themselves: no tight dresses and fake smiles on make-up gobbed faces. We also hear female voices which lead by their own direction; not voices which parrot teh menz. These women project their own ideas with their voices. And, I bet that scares a lot of men.

So, to me, it makes sense that the men on the Right wants to define those who parrot them as the "real feminists." And, it also explains why they absolutely hate the females on the left--those who will not be tamed.

Well, give me 100 Kamala Harris types, any day. No wonder the Democrats are now represented by so many women. It's the only party where women can be themselves.
Click to expand...

Yes..the difference is STARK!!!

chelsea ugly next to ivanka.jpg


Ugly, leech off of parent's slush fund faux "charity" leftist;

Beautiful, international business owner, CONSERVATIVE.
 
calamity said:
Basically, when you parse the words of Sarah Palin, Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin or the few dozen other female voices of the Right, one thing stands out. They parrot the men. These women promote the patriarchy's belief systems. They are not their own women. Look at Fox. It's bubble headed bleach blondes are us. They sit on the couch and bob their heads while teh menz speak.

Now, turn your head to the Left. When we listen to Kamala Harris, Rachael Maddow, Asha Rangappa or even Chelsea Clinton we see and hear from these women almost the exact opposite of what we've seen on the Right. On the Left we see women who are themselves: no tight dresses and fake smiles on make-up gobbed faces. We also hear female voices which lead by their own direction; not voices which parrot teh menz. These women project their own ideas with their voices. And, I bet that scares a lot of men.

So, to me, it makes sense that the men on the Right wants to define those who parrot them as the "real feminists." And, it also explains why they absolutely hate the females on the left--those who will not be tamed.

Well, give me 100 Kamala Harris types, any day. No wonder the Democrats are now represented by so many women. It's the only party where women can be themselves.
Click to expand...




Vagina phobia has been synonymous with Conservatives for many years, that is why they are so big on guns...not just having guns, lots of people have weapons but they are desperate for the biggest, baddest guns, simple as Penis extenders to shield or hide them from the big bad scary vagina!

Trump and his swamp rats are a good example...they went bunkers when women started to play them in SNL. This alone explains their extend of Vagina phobia.

Actually if you look at "Conservative Women on TV" It seems more show than substance, I honestly don't think their private persona is that vile, it is all an act because they know how simpleton the conservatives men are and how easily they can be lead and manipulated.

You want true strong Real conservative woman, someone like Thatcher or Golda Meir. They were not simply Male wearing Female skin, but real women with real values I disagree with a lot of them but I knew their were real.

Here is another metric. Do you why in Japanese Kabuki theater the role of females are played by men? Because only a man knows how a "REAL" woman should act. think about this there is lots of truth in that.

Diving Mullah
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom