Under Bush 13 embassy attacks occurred resulting in 60 deaths and not o whisper out of the Republicans
Set aside Kavanaugh's accusations he lacks the judicial temperament one would expect in the Supreme Court Justice. But it's much worse than that his whiny sniveling frat-boy entitled performance comprable to a petty partisan hack well he doesn't even deserve to be even a traffic court judge
Great Point...and many many more attacks have and will occur.
Why this sticks out more than the others
1) Libya has and still is on the TERROR list of Countries, They are still currently on the Travel ban list of 7 countries
2) Ambassador Stevens is the HIGHEST ranking official to be killed.
3) Due to the investigation the Stevens death showed a lack of diligence and seemingly accountability.
Lets look at your 13 embassies and who passed
1) Nepal, Nepeles security Guard, Not an a American
2) India, Calcutta, 5 local police died, not American's
3) Peru, Lima, 9 people killed, No Americans
4) Karachi, Pakistan, Suicide Bombing 12 dead 51 injure no Americans.
I can go oh, While MANY attacks do occur, unfortunately the Benghazi incident was highlighted due to the high ranking offical as well as the 3 other Americans.
"Set aside Kavannaughs Accusation" Your Assumption of judicial temperance is OPINION NOT fact.
Dr. Ford had 36 years to deal with her accusation. If it did occur how was HER Tempermant the day of, 2 weeks later 5 years later
Kavannaugh had the bomb dropped on him and had 5 days to react and 10 days to respond in a hearing. BOTH lives have been turned upside down. Ford had 36 years to deal with it. Kavannaugh had 10 days. ANY NORMAL HUMAN BEING would be PISSED and Emotional.
So to judge his "Temperament" from an accusation, NOW if he is guilty thats a different story, THERE currently is NO supporting evidence to validate, in other words IN Kavannaughs mind he is fighting a slanderous false accusation YES HE IS PISSED.
So now take 26+ years of federal Public service and time in the Judicial system from Bush WH to the DC circuit if he has or HAD a Judicial Temperament that was unbecoming what was it NOT discussed DURING the HEARING PRIOR to the accusation. I mean surely your indication is saying that HIS temperance IN GENERAL is unbecoming of a Judge and has NOTHING to do with an unfounded accusation that was dropped on him and his family out of NO where after 36 supposed years?
