• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Have You Noticed The Tactics of The Left?

I dont care about smearing I have posted it a bunch of times on here,

I am about the LAW and Justice, we need to get PREDATORS OFF our streets if he is a predator, ITS OUR CIVIC duty to protect other people and or women from these monsters. SO if he is guilty pursue criminal charges to PUT HIM in JAIL.

Yes, thank you. But unfortunately, like in many of these cases, the statute of limitations has run out. So unlikely he will ever be prosecuted now. But is the alternative that we let the deplorables put him in the US senate? I wouldn’t put it past them.
 
Man this was fun! Thanks!


My point is there is more than one way to look at it and your OP is highly slanted and incomplete. If your goal is to hate over half of your fellow countrymen … I pity you; it shouldn't be fun. That the right enjoys it so much is a big part of what is wrong with America today. -sad
 
Great Point...and many many more attacks have and will occur.

Why this sticks out more than the others

3) Due to the investigation the Stevens death showed a lack of diligence and seemingly accountability.

That's not true. Gowdy tried to ummm, shall we say smear, HRC for years and got no where.


I can go oh, While MANY attacks do occur, unfortunately the Benghazi incident was highlighted due to the high ranking offical as well as the 3 other Americans.

It was highlighted because it was the opening shots against HRC's presidential run.

"Set aside Kavannaughs Accusation"

Yes lets do because Kavanaugh showed himself to be angry, partisan, out of control, undisciplined, shifty and lacking veracity. Which independent of the Ford accusations should disqualify him from consideration for a position on the Supreme Court … or any court.

ANY NORMAL HUMAN BEING would be PISSED and Emotional.

Any person with his legal background, especially if innocent, would have presented themselves fully in control, cooperative and completely nonpartisan.

YES HE IS PISSED.

You noticed? So did the rest of America.

saying that HIS temperance IN GENERAL is unbecoming of a Judge

AbsaByGodLutely!!!! I misread that … HIS Temperamentt IN GENERAL is unbecoming of a Judge.

and has NOTHING to do with an unfounded accusation that was dropped on him and his family out of NO where after 36 supposed years?

Not completely unfounded and the 36 years are not supposed. But, yes, his temper tantrum in the Senate should disqualify him from the Supreme Court.
 
Last edited:
Benghazi was a CIA operation and the State Department had little to do with it. But don't let that little fact stop you from repeating the lie in order to make a false comparison.

Now fast forward...Trump is the last person that should be defending Kavanaugh.

Sure I can accept that, YET We still had a Temporary Embassy as WELL as an ambassador to Libya, whom the State Department is responsible for. Meaning that Ambassador Steven falls under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of State, while operations may fall under different entities LIKE CIA.

As for "Trump Defending Kavannaugh" I can Agree with you he is NOT the best, but he nominated him and must own his decision. Secondly, does not implicate anything Trump is not guilty of a crime nor is Kavannaugh.

Cory Booker talking about morals sitting on the panel while admitting to molesting a drunk teenager... he probabty not the best to judge Kavannaugh either...
 
Yes, thank you. But unfortunately, like in many of these cases, the statute of limitations has run out. So unlikely he will ever be prosecuted now. But is the alternative that we let the deplorables put him in the US senate? I wouldn’t put it past them.

Totally understand, I wish you saw my other post, This is the time to educate our children that we CANNOT wait we MUST be strong and report things in a fashion that DOES get these scumbags off the street PERIOD.
 
The left has SEIU, and ANTIFA thugs, to carry out daily beat downs. But it's only a matter of time before the anti-kooker left starts to shoot back. I mean, people can only take so much and Americans eventually get pushed to the limit after being nice fails.

What 'daily beat downs'?

Please list them off for the past, oh, 12 days.
 
My point is there is more than one way to look at it and your OP is highly slanted and incomplete. If your goal is to hate over half of your fellow countrymen … I pity you; it shouldn't be fun. That the right enjoys it so much is a big part of what is wrong with America today. -sad

In No way am I slinging Hate, I am slinging that we MUST look at our actions and be accountable. WITH THAT we must not continue the road of ruin that we are starting. THIS is a domino effect that will continue unless someone stands up and says thats enough.

Instead of looking at all the bad things, why not find what the person CAN do for us..... but alas that is likely a pipe dream. With that even my post here I try not to attack anyone or their view personally but try to apply facts so that we can make a rational decision together. EVEN if it means agreeing to disagree!
 
That's not true. Gowdy tried to ummm, shall we say smear, HRC for years and got no where.




It was highlighted because it was the opening shots against HRC's presidential run.



Yes lets do because Kavanaugh showed himself to be angry, partisan, out of control, undisciplined, shifty and lacking veracity. Which independent of the Ford accusations should disqualify him from consideration for a position on the Supreme Court … or any court.



Any person with his legal background, especially if innocent, would have presented themselves fully in control, cooperative and completely nonpartisan.



You noticed? So did the rest of America.



AbsaByGodLutely!!!! I misread that … HIS Temperamentt IN GENERAL is unbecoming of a Judge.



Not completely unfounded and the 36 years are not supposed. But, yes, his temper tantrum in the Senate should disqualify him from the Supreme Court.

Gowdy did probably play that smear game, But lives where lost that an ambassador and a private server WAS found with Classified material that WAS transferred through it. Smear or not those did in fact happen.

Sure HRC run, But 4 American's did die and that was the HIGHEST ranking official Death in Years....

You Opinion of interpretation, I am a legal body voting American and I do NOT see it that way, so we can agree to disagree.

Legal background, Honestly It would not matter if he acted even keel the Dems would say hes lying and unfit, if he shows emotion and pissed, they would say hes lying and unfit... NOTHING in regards to ACTUAL FACTS just interpretation of how they feel.... meaning guilty with no regards to facts.... Sad but likely true no? I mean the dems ALL said before the hearings that they would NOT nominate him anyways.. SO this WHOLE thing is really just a show. it meant nothing because Repubs have majority. IT was just intended to create discord..... .

Yes I hope America Saw him pissed and like I a male in my 30's Scared out of my MIND that when Im 50 and my children are grown some women may accuse me of something I feel I was never did...... scary... how when I put the shoe on the other foot it does not feel good period. have you tried to imagine if you were in Kavannaughs position with your children looking on?

Sorry auto correct... my grammar sucks! Again that is opinion, my opinion is that was his HUMAN moment to show that as a Human with emotion can make a fair call and not just a robot bent on a single partisan view but alas cup is half full half empty.

Temper tantrum I saw none, I saw a pissed of guy that has been accused of a crime he feels 100% he did not commit on the public stage and his family and his life is forever turned upside down. AGAIN shoe on the other foot...... but again that shot is not the same color, design, designer so you guys wont even try it on....
 
In the eyes of everyone with two brain cells, he was guilty of everything and the People voiced their disgust for him. Pssst, not being charged does not equate to innocence.


I get the point you are making I think. Like how Hillary wasn't charged with mishandling classified information doesn't mean she was innocent.

However I'm not sure innocence is the right phrase. Being innocent means you are Not convicted of a crime. If you were never charged and thus not convicted you would be innocent by definition.

I agree that just because there isn't enough evidence to prosecut or there isn't a desire to prosecut does not mean a crime wasn't committed.


I don't know what the correct term would be But innocence just doesn't seem it.
 
Last edited:
Sure I can accept that, YET We still had a Temporary Embassy as WELL as an ambassador to Libya, whom the State Department is responsible for. Meaning that Ambassador Steven falls under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of State, while operations may fall under different entities LIKE CIA.

As for "Trump Defending Kavannaugh" I can Agree with you he is NOT the best, but he nominated him and must own his decision. Secondly, does not implicate anything Trump is not guilty of a crime nor is Kavannaugh.

Cory Booker talking about morals sitting on the panel while admitting to molesting a drunk teenager... he probabty not the best to judge Kavannaugh either...

Ambassador Stevens was acting as diplomatic cover for the CIA and it was their responsibility to protect him.

At least Booker his didn't lie about his HS experience like Kavanaugh is. I suspect that's because he has a lot worse things to hide.
 
Just accuse'em of a heinous sex crime, or maybe whoring around, or maybe pissing on a bed, or maybe gang rape, or maybe etc.

It's getting kinda worn out, the leftist kooks need a new schtick.

Have you noticed that the people who make the very most partisan posts tend to claim that every time a conservative is accused it is false, and that every time a liberal is accused that that person is a disgusting evil liberal who is guilty?

That sixteen accusers against a President that won is worth less than a photograph of a Democrat pretending to be about to touch a woman's breasts? That not only does scale or degree vanish, but in fact, any guilt vanishes when the accusation is near a Conservative? Do you notice that - not among every last conservative that exists, no - but do you not notice this to be a substantial pattern?



Now, I'm sure I'm a librul smellybutt and poopooface to you, which is fine by me. So don't bother with the response. But, do reality a favor. Write down a list of accusations of sexual misconduct against some Ds and Rs, write down why they are guilty and innocent, and then recite it to your reflection in the mirror.
 
Last edited:
Here is a really good quote from Peterson in the tactics of the Left:

Everything that is reprehensible about the radical and ideologically-possessed left – all the moral self-righteousness, the platitudes, the clichés, the mindless celebration of diversity for the sake of the demonstration of tolerance, the naivete, and the appalling malevolence of casual denunciation – is on painful display in this missive, exposure to such a piece of writing left me with a strong desire for a hot shower accompanied by plenty of soap and a scrub brush.
https://www.heraldsun.com/news/local/counties/durham-county/article214554920.html

I wonder when he gets his #METOO Moment!

Surely it shant be long!
 
Just accuse'em of a heinous sex crime, or maybe whoring around, or maybe pissing on a bed, or maybe gang rape, or maybe etc.

It's getting kinda worn out, the leftist kooks need a new schtick.

lie, slander and defame, threaten his family, and then claim he won't be objective towards the assholes who lied about him, threatened his family or defamed him
 
Ambassador Stevens was acting as diplomatic cover for the CIA and it was their responsibility to protect him.

At least Booker his didn't lie about his HS experience like Kavanaugh is. I suspect that's because he has a lot worse things to hide.

LOL Diplomatic cover? OK. with that he is STILL an Ambassador, That being said if that is TRUE then if the CIA was supposed to protect why the supposed Stand down for 30 minutes for the acting GRS unit NOT to respond? Secondly if the CIA was reponsible why ONLY the GRS unit providing security for the CIA Base? Why Only a 2 man Diplomant PSD Team. (These are loaded question because YES in my prior life I was active with a PSD Teams) BOTH military and contractor. So your "assumption" is still not validating why the CIA if cover did not provide proper security secondly STATE Department WAS to provide PSD for the Ambassador again the 2 MAN PSD Team...

Finally the acknowledgement of booker.

KAVANNAUGH has Denied 100% percet, there is NO corroborating evidence, IF YOU HAVE FACTUAL Evidence why Dont you PROVIDE it to the FBI so they can charge Kavannaugh and we can get a Predator like him of the streets.

Your assumption of guilt has NO bearing... unless you have FACTUAL evidence to provide if not it is all assumption and bias NOT facts.
 
Just accuse'em of a heinous sex crime, or maybe whoring around, or maybe pissing on a bed, or maybe gang rape, or maybe etc.

It's getting kinda worn out, the leftist kooks need a new schtick.
Have You Noticed The Tactics of The Right? Seriously politicians in glass houses...
 
Ever notice how we've only did that for one other of the scotus justices and funny thing -- he did it.

Competent educated sophisticated women do not come out of the woodwork and risk everything and make this stuff up but leave it to a dumb right-winger to be unable to figure that out
Unstable women do/
 
Have You Noticed The Tactics of The Right? Seriously politicians in glass houses...

Are we allowed to talk about the problems of the Left or is that off limits?

You do agree that there are problems correct?
 
Ever notice how we've only did that for one other of the scotus justices and funny thing -- he did it.

Competent educated sophisticated women do not come out of the woodwork and risk everything and make this stuff up but leave it to a dumb right-winger to be unable to figure that out

Try running that theory past a divorce lawyer or judge....
 
Are we allowed to talk about the problems of the Left or is that off limits?

You do agree that there are problems correct?

WTF I am not on the left so why the **** would I care?

And yes there are very big problems with all political parties. All what political parties do is breed corruption.
 
We got here because the processes and institutions have not been taken care of.....and you need to keep in mind that centrists have been as guilty of this neglect as have those currently on the extremes. What we got is what one gets when one does not mind the interests of the nation, this represents justice.

Well, that tends to be the great problem with popular rule.
Eventually people get lazy, and the mechanisms of popular rule are subverted. Then well intentioned tyranny is instituted to fix the problems, which inevitably becomes malicious tyranny (sometimes over decades, sometimes before anyone has time to blink). Eventually the malicious tyranny falls, and mob rule is instituted, which shortly becomes popular rule. But of course only if the society is lucky and doesn't become extinct during the upheaval. No matter what, rivers of blood will flow.

The only counteragent I can think of is to delay the getting lazy part for as long as possible, but eventually generations will grow up who simply do not understand, and therefore become lazy.
Unfortunately I think that it is too late in the case of the Western world. We are going to end up with one type of Tyranny or another, because we were too complacent for too long, and the time to fix the problems the right way has come and gone. Now all that remains to be seen if whether our civilization will become extinct or go for another turn of the wheel.
 
Well, that tends to be the great problem with popular rule.
Eventually people get lazy, and the mechanisms of popular rule are subverted. Then well intentioned tyranny is instituted to fix the problems, which inevitably becomes malicious tyranny (sometimes over decades, sometimes before anyone has time to blink). Eventually the malicious tyranny falls, and mob rule is instituted, which shortly becomes popular rule. But of course only if the society is lucky and doesn't become extinct during the upheaval. No matter what, rivers of blood will flow.

The only counteragent I can think of is to delay the getting lazy part for as long as possible, but eventually generations will grow up who simply do not understand, and therefore become lazy.
Unfortunately I think that it is too late in the case of the Western world. We are going to end up with one type of Tyranny or another, because we were too complacent for too long, and the time to fix the problems the right way has come and gone. Now all that remains to be seen if whether our civilization will become extinct or go for another turn of the wheel.

Ya I think it is too late for the West as well, our systems dont work and we are deeply spiritually disturbed. Once willful ignorance and/or mass mental illness sets in it is very difficult to obtain a reasonable outcome. The East works much better at the moment so the New Chinese Empire will have little trouble rolling over us. What happens after that I dont know, I dont know if I have any hope that life under their rule for either Chinese or not Chinese has any hope of being anything but terrible.

I have been trying to figure out what is the root cause of the failure of the West, do you have any theories? And on why the East appears at least to not be infected with the disease what ever it is....


I am pretty sure that it has to do with the misuse of science and technology, that this goes back to failures of the Enlightenment to understand human nature.

Maybe we start a new thread to handle the conversation if you desire to do it, so that we dont derail this thread..
 
Last edited:
Ever notice how we've only did that for one other of the scotus justices and funny thing -- he did it.

Competent educated sophisticated women do not come out of the woodwork and risk everything and make this stuff up but leave it to a dumb right-winger to be unable to figure that out

Competent? Are you sure that you even know what the word means?

She had to go to a marriage counselor over a home remodel spat? Really? She's so unhinged that she can't have a normal discussion with her husband about a freaking remodel?

Admitted to therapy for other underlying conditions not necessarily stemming from the her attempted rape claim?

She didn't know how to contact her congressional rep or who ever it was she was rambling on about?

Relied on her cute "Surf Buddies" for legal questions?

The second door was for business, and not claustrophobia?

Lying about her fear of flying while she routinely flies all over for vacations?
 
It’s going to be a tall order to try to beat the 6 years straight of talking about Obama’s Kenyan passport Schtik.

Not really. I think ruining peoples lives and careers by falsely accusing them of a sexual crime beats talking about one person's passport.
 
Ever notice how we've only did that for one other of the scotus justices and funny thing -- he did it.

Competent educated sophisticated women do not come out of the woodwork and risk everything and make this stuff up but leave it to a dumb right-winger to be unable to figure that out

Sure they do. If the money is right.
 
Ever notice how we've only did that for one other of the scotus justices and funny thing -- he did it.

Competent educated sophisticated women do not come out of the woodwork and risk everything and make this stuff up but leave it to a dumb right-winger to be unable to figure that out

Just because you claim he did it doesn't make it true.
 
Back
Top Bottom