• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New letter to Grassley: There’s something you should know about Julie Swetnick

trixare4kids said:
It disgusts me that anti-Trump women and men have sold out the #metoo movement by weaponizing it.

bg100118dAPR20181001024507.jpg
Click to expand...
Unfortunately, I think that was inevitable.
 
Tanngrisnir said:
How does that make him a 'porn lawyer'?

You seem awfully confused about the fact that words have meanings.
Click to expand...

Ever hear of an opinion? Or is an opinion suddenly a new concept for you on a political debate discussion board?

Call Avenatti a respectable attorney,... I don't care, IMO, he's a sleazy porn lawyer.

Yeah, I am so confused. :lol:
I have a hard time believing that you don't know the difference between my expressed opinion verses a fact.
You argue just to argue over minutiae. IMO, that's your m/o. Again, MY opinion.
 
Chillfolks said:
Calling Sweatnick a ****-whore is about as low class as democrats calling Kavanaugh a rapist. Why act like an ass? Hasn't there been enough low class behaviour over the last week or so?
Click to expand...

Yes it is low class. But so is accusing Kavanaugh of being gangbanging rapist and drugging women to do it and have Democrats give it any credibility when there isn't a damn bit of evidence to dare utter such words!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Moon said:
Unfortunately, I think that was inevitable.
Click to expand...

It absolutely turns my stomach to know that the Democrats have exploited and used a pet group, WOMEN, to advance their deplorable politics. Immoral liars.
 
Grokmaster said:
Well she did RETURN FOR 10+ GANGBANG PARTIES, according to herself...
Click to expand...

Even so, I don't think I'd support name calling, and calling her a '****-whore'.

Sufficient to call her someone with psychological 'challenges', don't you think?
 
eohrnberger said:
Even so, I don't think I'd support name calling, and calling her a '****-whore'.

Sufficient to call her someone with psychological 'challenges', don't you think?
Click to expand...

It's sad she allowed herself to be used by Democratic operatives. She is responsible for that.
Even sadder though to me, and once again, the good old Democrats exploited a woman for their own party politics who has psyche issues. They could have vetted her but didn't... Even her own father said she has some real mental issues. smh
 
trixare4kids said:
OK, but there still is no excuse for making it personal, and invoking his wife into the thread.
End of discussion.
Click to expand...



I went back and apologized for what I said in making my point. The OP has yet to apologize for his remarks.
Now we can end the discussion
 
Chillfolks said:
I went back and apologized for what I said in making my point. The OP has yet to apologize for his remarks.
Now we can end the discussion
Click to expand...

I'm good with that. :)

Have a nice evening...
 
trixare4kids said:
It's sad she allowed herself to be used by Democratic operatives. She is responsible for that.
Even sadder though to me, and once again, the good old Democrats exploited a woman for their own party politics who has psyche issues. They could have vetted her but didn't... Even her own father said she has some real mental issues. smh
Click to expand...

Agreed. There are two victims of the Dems political Machiavellian chicanery and smear job, Kavanaugh and Ford.

To use a women as a political tool, to exploit her as a political tool, is simply unconscionable, amoral, and ethics-less.

Yet some feel that our government would be oh so much better if more of these values and ethics were elected to high government office. :screwy
 
eohrnberger said:
Agreed. There are two victims of the Dems political Machiavellian chicanery and smear job, Kavanaugh and Ford.

To use a women as a political tool, to exploit her as a political tool, is simply unconscionable, amoral, and ethics-less.

Yet some feel that our government would be oh so much better if more of these values and ethics were elected to high government office. :screwy
Click to expand...

The Democratic Party are anti-women... They must really think the voting electorate is buying their crap.
A pox on that party!
 
trixare4kids said:
The Democratic Party are anti-women... They must really think the voting electorate is buying their crap.
A pox on that party!
Click to expand...

Fair enough.

But I were calling fox poxes on political parties, I think I'd have to call multiple poxes on both parties, especially the party's elite, for the rather shameful job of leading that they've been doing for the last 20 years or so.
 
trixare4kids said:
Ever hear of an opinion? Or is an opinion suddenly a new concept for you on a political debate discussion board?

Call Avenatti a respectable attorney,... I don't care, IMO, he's a sleazy porn lawyer.

Yeah, I am so confused. :lol:
I have a hard time believing that you don't know the difference between my expressed opinion verses a fact.
You argue just to argue over minutiae. IMO, that's your m/o. Again, MY opinion.
Click to expand...

What's a 'porn lawyer'?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom