• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If The FBI Is Investigating These Allegations, They Absolutely Must Investigate Ford's Credibility

chuckiechan

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Messages
16,568
Reaction score
7,253
Location
California Caliphate
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Ace of Spades HQ

Questions that must be asked of Ford, and her lawyers, and Democrats -- under oath.

1. Democratic staffers, particularly those of Diane Feinstein, must be asked under oath and under penalty of felony if they leaked Ford's name and/or her letter to friendlies in the media.

2. Ford must be asked, under oath, which therapist notes she gave to the Washington Post. She was asked this yesterday, but suffered one of her notorious memory lapses and said she didn't know and would have to ask her lawyers. Which she then proceeded to not ask them.

3. Obviously, any time she claims she doesn't know and that only her lawyers would know, her lawyers must be asked under oath.

Her lawyers, by the way, cannot invoke lawyer-client privilege regarding notes they gave to a third party. Information given to a third party is not a confidential lawyer-client communication and not shielded by privilege.

There is no such thing as "Lawyer-Feinstein privilege," and Ford's political operators with legal licenses should not be permitted to invent one.

4. Her therapist's notes must be taken up by the FBI. Literally nobody in America believes that Ford and her husband were at a marriage counselor about a disagreement about adding a second door to the house.

What were they really in therapy for? People have been known to lie in therapy if it's needed to keep themselves out of trouble from their spouse.

5. Why did she lie when she claimed she could not fly? Did her lawyers tell her to say that? The parties can invoke privilege here, but their invocation of privilege -- refusing to answer questions in an investigation they demanded -- should be noted and publicized.

6. Did her lawyers inform her that Republicans had offered to fly to California or did they hide that from her? Or did they just tell her to lie about it?

7. All correspondence between her lawyers and Diane Feinstein and other Democrats must be submitted to the FBI. We suspect coordination, and if there's going to be an investigation, we want it all investigated.

8. Her personal polygraphologist must explain how he conducted the test, how long he took to prep her, etc.

And who paid him. And whether or not a certain result was expected.

9. And a big one -- how many other people has Ford accused of sexual harassment or assault? Perhaps this is her first and only time. If so, that adds to her credibility.

So get busy FBI. You aren't working for the Clintons anymore.
 
Ace of Spades HQ



So get busy FBI. You aren't working for the Clintons anymore.

Well, that's fine but Ford isn't applying for a job. Sure it may cast doubt on her claims but, if it's shown that Kavanaugh lied in a coverup, he's toast.
 
Well, that's fine but Ford isn't applying for a job. Sure it may cast doubt on her claims but, if it's shown that Kavanaugh lied in a coverup, he's toast.

Lied about what? Someone claims he drank a lot of beer?
 
She claimed she obtained "medical treatment for the assault." (Her exact words).

As a psychologist herself, she knows that psychological counseling is not MEDICAL therapy. Psychologists are strictly prohibited from doing medical anything. So, when, where and from whom did she receive MEDICAL care?
 
She claimed she obtained "medical treatment for the assault." (Her exact words).

As a psychologist herself, she knows that psychological counseling is not MEDICAL therapy. Psychologists are strictly prohibited from doing medical anything. So, when, where and from whom did she receive MEDICAL care?

Medical psychology is in fact considered medicine.
 
Last edited:
Well, that's fine but Ford isn't applying for a job. Sure it may cast doubt on her claims but, if it's shown that Kavanaugh lied in a coverup, he's toast.

She accusing someone of a crime. The varacity of her claim must be determined.

If she's found to have lied under oath, or to the FBI, she should be prosecuted and locked up.
 
She accusing someone of a crime. The varacity of her claim must be determined.

If she's found to have lied under oath, or to the FBI, she should be prosecuted and locked up.

Okay, you're gonna do the whole they're the real criminals, man schtick.
 
Anybody who wants the FBI to look into Dr Ford's allegations needs to talk to Donny. Ford is looking for the FBI...so far...a no show and apparently no intention on their part of showing. The WH is the client for this reopened BI. They are calling the tune. Ford is not on the Interview list.
 
She accusing someone of a crime. The varacity of her claim must be determined.

If she's found to have lied under oath, or to the FBI, she should be prosecuted and locked up.

But of course.

That's why the republicans live in fear of an honest FBI investigation.

Kavanaugh knows this and, much like you, cannot face that fact.
 
But of course.

That's why the republicans live in fear of an honest FBI investigation.

Kavanaugh knows this and, much like you, cannot face that fact.

That don't make sense. It isn't even good trollage. :lamo
 
Anybody who wants the FBI to look into Dr Ford's allegations needs to talk to Donny. Ford is looking for the FBI...so far...a no show and apparently no intention on their part of showing. The WH is the client for this reopened BI. They are calling the tune. Ford is not on the Interview list.

And she should not be. She is too much of a symphetic victim of what appears to be either psychosis induced hallucinations, or chemically induced hallucinations. For all the evidence so far, there is no proof she ever left her house.

However Sweatbeck and Ramerez should swing if they don’t come clean.
 
Well, that's fine but Ford isn't applying for a job. Sure it may cast doubt on her claims but, if it's shown that Kavanaugh lied in a coverup, he's toast.
Yeah... the longtime democrat operative accuser with ZERO PROOF or CORRORBORATION should be "excused" from scrutiny.


Deliberate false reporting of a non-existent crime IS A CRIME.
 
Back
Top Bottom