• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ford's Female "Witness" Says She Doesn't Remember Party, Doesn't Know Kavanaugh

Grokmaster

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
9,613
Reaction score
2,735
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
Uh-oh. Looks like the DNC Manufactured Outrage While Ignoring Keith Ellison's Beat-Up Ex-Girlfriend Crusade might have to cut some more checks through Perkins Coies, huh?

Ford's story looses credibility DAILY, as not a SINGLE PERSON SHE HAS CITED as her "WITNESSES" supports her claims.



Lawyer says woman doesn't recall attending party, doesn't know Kavanaugh





WASHINGTON (AP) — The Latest on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and a woman accusing him of sexually assaulting her decades ago (all times local):

12:10 a.m.

The lawyer for a woman who Brett Kavanaugh's accuser has said attended the 1980s party at which he allegedly molested her has told Senate Republican investigators that the woman doesn't recall such a gathering or know the Supreme Court nominee.

The Washington Post reports Saturday that Christine Blasey Ford told them that Leland Keyser was at that high school party.

A GOP Judiciary Committee investigator contacted Keyser last Tuesday, saying Keyser had been "identified" as attending that party and wanted to talk to her. Committee spokesman Taylor Foy said Keyser's name "came up" in its investigation.

But in an email late Saturday, Keyser attorney Howard Walsh told the committee she "does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection" of ever attending a gathering with Kavanaugh.


That response seemed a setback to Ford supporters' efforts to corroborate her claim.







https://www.yahoo.com/news/latest-latest-deadline-looms-kavanaugh-accuser-151503689--politics.html
 
Uh-oh. Looks like the DNC Manufactured Outrage While Ignoring Keith Ellison's Beat-Up Ex-Girlfriend Crusade might have to cut some more checks through Perkins Coies, huh?

Ford's story looses credibility DAILY, as not a SINGLE PERSON SHE HAS CITED as her "WITNESSES" supports her claims.



Lawyer says woman doesn't recall attending party, doesn't know Kavanaugh





WASHINGTON (AP) — The Latest on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and a woman accusing him of sexually assaulting her decades ago (all times local):

12:10 a.m.

The lawyer for a woman who Brett Kavanaugh's accuser has said attended the 1980s party at which he allegedly molested her has told Senate Republican investigators that the woman doesn't recall such a gathering or know the Supreme Court nominee.

The Washington Post reports Saturday that Christine Blasey Ford told them that Leland Keyser was at that high school party.

A GOP Judiciary Committee investigator contacted Keyser last Tuesday, saying Keyser had been "identified" as attending that party and wanted to talk to her. Committee spokesman Taylor Foy said Keyser's name "came up" in its investigation.

But in an email late Saturday, Keyser attorney Howard Walsh told the committee she "does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection" of ever attending a gathering with Kavanaugh.


That response seemed a setback to Ford supporters' efforts to corroborate her claim.







https://www.yahoo.com/news/latest-latest-deadline-looms-kavanaugh-accuser-151503689--politics.html

Kavanaugh is getting just what he deserves whether he is guilty or not. A good thorough interrogation. Repubs need to stop whining and speculating and just accept the fact he will most likely be confirmed,and sit on the SCOTUS with a dark cloud hanging over his head each and every day he dons that robe.
 
Kavanaugh is getting just what he deserves whether he is guilty or not. A good thorough interrogation. Repubs need to stop whing and just accept the fact he will most likely be appointed,and sit on the SCOTUS with a dark cloud hanging over his head each and every day he dons that robe.
Gee..it's like Stalin NEVER DIED, Comrade.

Please explain how Kavanaugh "deserves" this.
 
I looked for that Washington Post article. Couldn't find it. Have you seen it? Because everything that I have seen has indicated that Senators aids have sought her out and there's nothing about Ms. Ford telling the Washington Post about Ms. Keyser.
 
The so-called rejection states:
Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.
Where I come from, "I don't know and I don't recall" is hardly a rejection or affirmation of anything, other perhaps than a writer's/speaker's bad memory and dearth of information/awareness.

The party had five people there. I'm sure there are literally hundreds of Brett and Ford's school-/classmates who can and would say exactly what Ms. Keyser said.
 
How does him being a SCOTUS nominee mean that he deserves what's been happening to him?

What 'specifically' are you referring to when you say 'what's been happening to him'? I can better address your question if you are more specific.
 
He's a SCOTUS nominee.Wake up and smell the coffee.

How does him being a SCOTUS nominee mean that he deserves what's been happening to him?

What's germane isn't what he deserves but rather what we, as citizens deserve to know about a person who may sit in judgment of potentially anything and everything pertaining to the rule of law in the U.S.

One's holding public office of any sort is a privilege -- the privilege of serving the American people -- not a right. Holding public office is a privilege one earns not a gift one deserves to receive. The privilege of sitting on the SCOTUS is not and should not be easily earned. It takes whatever it takes, and what it's taking for Brett is our coming to know all the now-knowable details of the matter Dr. Ford has raised.
 
Kavanaugh is getting just what he deserves whether he is guilty or not. A good thorough interrogation. Repubs need to stop whining and speculating and just accept the fact he will most likely be confirmed,and sit on the SCOTUS with a dark cloud hanging over his head each and every day he dons that robe.
Oh there will be a dark cloud when this is all said and done, but it won't be hovering over Kavanaugh.
 
What's germane isn't what he deserves but rather what we, as citizens deserve to know about a person who may sit in judgment of potentially anything and everything pertaining to the rule of law in the U.S.

Depends on your POV. To the best of my ability I have seen no evidence that he deserves to be called a rapist. No one deserves that unless there is evidence that they actually are a rapist. I have not seen any such evidence for Kavanaugh. I've seen A claim. But that's it. A claim.

One's holding public office of any sort is a privilege -- the privilege of serving the American people -- not a right. Holding public office is a privilege one earns not a gift one deserves to receive. The privilege of sitting on the SCOTUS is not and should not be easily earned. It takes whatever it takes, and what it's taking for Brett is our coming to know all the now-knowable details of the matter Dr. Ford has raised.

So far there are no details that Ms. Ford has raised that give evidence that Kavanaugh is a rapist.

For the rest, I agree.
 
Oh there will be a dark cloud when this is all said and done, but it won't be hovering over Kavanaugh.

Of course there will be.Thomas has been sitting for 25 years and he still has a dark cloud hanging over his head also. That is just a statement of fact.Otherwise his name would have never been mentioned regarding Kavanaugh's proceedings.
 
Of course there will be.Thomas has been sitting for 25 years and he still has a dark cloud hanging over his head also. That is just a statement of fact.Otherwise his name would have never been mentioned regarding Kavanaugh's proceedings.

If there's a dark cloud over Kavanaugh when this is done, it will be of the type only visible to useful idiots.
 
Kavanaugh is getting just what he deserves whether he is guilty or not. A good thorough interrogation. Repubs need to stop whining and speculating and just accept the fact he will most likely be confirmed,and sit on the SCOTUS with a dark cloud hanging over his head each and every day he dons that robe.

There was a good investigation.

6 or 7 times by the FBI too.

Democrats pulled a slimy trick... they had the letter for more than a month... Feinstein had it when she met with Kavanaugh.

Any moron with three brain cells knows what is going on.

Democrats will burn down the house to prevent a SCOTUS justice who follows the Constitution from taking a seat.

But HEY!!!

Thanks Harry Reid.

Kavanaugh will go through... this woman’s claims have zero credibility. They’d be dismissed in a court room in 2 seconds.

:)

9994A61A-7182-4E13-9109-672BF44A2F39.jpg

73750393-EE95-4C9F-ADDE-E6330B3BAE84.jpg

CA5F9C31-0A60-44B3-B7DD-0ED88B764944.jpg
 
So far there are no details that Ms. Ford has raised that give evidence that Kavanaugh is a rapist.
Of course there is no such evidence. Ford didn't assert the man is a rapist.
 
Of course there is no such evidence. Ford didn't assert the man is a rapist.
the liberals on here allowed the press to do that for her.
 
Of course there is no such evidence. Ford didn't assert the man is a rapist.

I was being lazy. :roll: Scuze me while I correct myself for your pleasure.

So far there are no details that Ms. Ford has raised that give evidence that Kavanaugh physically and sexually assaulted (<--taken, as in copy and pasted, directly from Ms. Fords letter) Ms. Ford.

Better?
 
Of course there will be.Thomas has been sitting for 25 years and he still has a dark cloud hanging over his head also. That is just a statement of fact.Otherwise his name would have never been mentioned regarding Kavanaugh's proceedings.

No there’s not, only dedicated leftists who are racist against black men have spent any time at all since 1991 caring about Justice Thomas. There is no cloud at all over Thomas once you get outside the bubbles of the extreme left
 
Of course there is no such evidence. Ford didn't assert the man is a rapist.

You should splain that to a crap load of left of centers here on DP.

You might wanna cancel your appointments though, it could take awhile.
 
He's a SCOTUS nominee.Wake up and smell the coffee.

So he should be smeared with totally unsubstantiated claims of and event that none of her "witnesses" agree happened, and that she herself " cannot remember" the location or time of, from decades ago. Got it.
 
Last edited:
The so-called rejection states:

Where I come from, "I don't know and I don't recall" is hardly a rejection or affirmation of anything, other perhaps than a writer's/speaker's bad memory and dearth of information/awareness.

The party had five people there. I'm sure there are literally hundreds of Brett and Ford's school-/classmates who can and would say exactly what Ms. Keyser said.

Right. It is a TOTAL DENIAL OF FORD's CLAIMS or do leftist liars commonly "forget" where and when they were sexually assaulted, as well as EVERY WITNESS THEY CITE?
 
Last edited:
What's germane isn't what he deserves but rather what we, as citizens deserve to know about a person who may sit in judgment of potentially anything and everything pertaining to the rule of law in the U.S.

One's holding public office of any sort is a privilege -- the privilege of serving the American people -- not a right. Holding public office is a privilege one earns not a gift one deserves to receive. The privilege of sitting on the SCOTUS is not and should not be easily earned. It takes whatever it takes, and what it's taking for Brett is our coming to know all the now-knowable details of the matter Dr. Ford has raised.



We DO NOT DESERVE unsubstantiated claims about an alleged event from decades ago, that NONE OF THE ACCUSER'S CITED WITNESSES confirms, and that she "cannot remember" the time and place it occurred.


If this were a democrat POTUS' nominee, you would be rioting in the streets.
 
How does him being a SCOTUS nominee mean that he deserves what's been happening to him?

He's been accused of sexual assault. Do you think the acusation should be ignored? Or should it be investigated?
 
Oh there will be a dark cloud when this is all said and done, but it won't be hovering over Kavanaugh.

There is no "dark cloud" hanging over Clarence Thomas, after Anita Hill was EXPOSED AS A LIAR, by her own coworkers, colleagues and actions.
 
Back
Top Bottom