Red:
AFAIK, no "self-righteous SJW" has bid you to care about what s/he thinks of your adeptness with how English works; thus that you don't care what any such individual(s) thinks is inconsequential. By all means and to your heart's content, however, do avail yourself of tilting of as many windmills as you see fit.
Blue:
[*=1]The post to which you responded (post 112) contains links that clarify connotative aspect of what I meant.
[*=1]I wasn't dictating anything. I was applying extant standard English denotations and connotations associated with the word "missy." (See also post 118.)
Pink + Tan:
Inasmuch as English isn't your first language, I shan't try to disabuse you of your mistaken notion because I have no desire to be "ESOL-ly" and/or linguistically didactic. The content to which I've linked in post 112 and in this post provides the information needed to understand why your interpretation of my remarks in post 112 is errant. If there're specific passages in those links that confound you, if you neutrally ask me for clarification, I'll try to explain them and/or point you to better instructional websites that do so. (What is your first language?)
Similarly, the oversized "pink" text above mischaracterizes the nature of my remarks in post 112:
[*=1]"Having a huge problem" --> I haven't a problem, let alone a huge one, with how the OP-er address his remark. The OP-er's remarks are a reflection of his/her mindset. If s/he cares, s/he'll alter his dictional choices; if s/he doesn't car, s/he won't.
In post 112, I explain the denotative and connotative implications of the OP-er's use of "missy" to address a grown woman. Although you've inferred that I have a problem with the OP-er's dictional choice, nothing in the post indicates whether I object or don't object to his/her having done so.
[*=1]"Very strongly" --> My remarks were unequivocally yet neutrally phrased. Perhaps you're accustomed to English writers/speakers who use namby-pamby diction and syntax so as to afford themselves wiggle room, as it were, or because their command of English is weak? If you are, that is why you think my expositive remarks in post 112 reflect a "strong" reaction. To understand why my remarks are not "strong," as you put it, you must understand the key and subtle differences between observations and accusations. Look at post 112; nowhere in it will you a normative assertion of my sentiments about his/her having used "missy."
[*=1]"Care so much" --> You've conflated sharing an observation with expressing an emotional interest. The two are not the same things.
