• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:43]Tucker Battles Avenatti

Tucker Battles Avenatti

ultmd said:
You're right. Watching the video doesn't necessarily make you a Tucker Carlson watcher, or a member of the FoxNews crowd.

What gives it away is that you didn't recognize the irony in your words.
Click to expand...

Oh please, I have an opinion about Avenatti and you don’t agree. That’s all. I also think President Trump is a narcissistic mountebank.

Any questions?
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

Winston said:
I have a hard time believing Tucker Carlson didn't get destroyed by Avenatti. Avenatti is sharp. And I've seen duller blades eviscerate Carlson.
Click to expand...

Avoided watching the video we, see. Who can blame you...if you think "I publicly admitted to leaking information illegally" and "got caught withholding tax payments from employees , and got fined $10,000,000 for it, and may still be prosecuted/disbarred over it" Mouthenatti is "pretty sharp.
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

Grokmaster said:
Avoided watching the video we, see. Who can blame you...if you think "I publicly admitted to leaking information illegally" and "got caught withholding tax payments from employees , and got fined $10,000,000 for it, and may still be prosecuted/disbarred over it" Mouthenatti is "pretty sharp.
Click to expand...

I tend to doubt accusations from hyper-partisans because they are proven to be fantasies in almost every single case.
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

Grokmaster said:
Hey, it's an Alinsky disciple... again...desperately trying to CHANGE THE TOPIC.
Click to expand...

Actually, I was being more of a Trump and his base disciple.

The lawyer was being framed as "Creepy," which I thought was unfair. Because the accusations was made by a Trump supporter, I thought I should point out that Trump is twice as creepy as this lawyer, and used Trump's creepy pictures and comments about his own daughter to highlight the issue.

So even though I might be accused of being a Trump, I think my post was legit..
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

Mach said:
By avoiding Fox news and large font and nearly incoherent rambling of conspiracy theory styled nonsense. For example.
Click to expand...

Hilarious !! Another DP TDS Leftist REDUCED TO COMMENTING on "FONT", and "conspiracy theories" after getting its ass handed to it.


The Alinsky nonsense is RAMPANT HERE...how funny.

Care to ADDRESS THE POINTS I MADE? Or are you ore comfortable posting about IRRELEVANT BULL****?
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

Winston said:
I tend to doubt accusations from hyper-partisans because they are proven to be fantasies in almost every single case.
Click to expand...

You tend to doubt the facts, and are too intellectually DISHONEST to research them for yourself, OBVIOUSLY.


Ignorant of the facts about Mouthenatti, we see.
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

Grokmaster said:
You tend to doubt the facts, and are too intellectually DISHONEST to research them for yourself, OBVIOUSLY.


Ignorant of the facts about Mouthenatti, we see.
Click to expand...

You got me pegged. :thumbs:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

Grokmaster said:
Oh look!! Another DP leftist who can no longer debate its asinine position, reduced to personal insults.
Click to expand...

Grokmaster said:
Speaking of "idiots"...ignorant of the facts...
Click to expand...

Grokmaster said:
You tend to doubt the facts, and are too intellectually DISHONEST to research them for yourself, OBVIOUSLY.


Ignorant of the facts about Mouthenatti, we see.
Click to expand...

I know this wasn't directed at me, but the irony....oh sweet irony. :lamo
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

JustHanging said:
I know this wasn't directed at me, but the irony....oh the irony. :lamo
Click to expand...

No irony involved. The person it was directed at did exactly as I described.

I am MORE THAN HAPPY to debate the points.,. the DP left seems to be "retreating" into personal attacks and Strawman nonsense...
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

Grokmaster said:
Oh look!! Another DP leftist who can no longer debate its asinine position, reduced to personal insults.
Click to expand...

...says the wingnut as he deflects from his inability to defend his ignorant position.

Speaking of "idiots"...ignorant of the facts , as well:



Investigation Confirms That Brian Williams Told Many Lies
(About his life.)

Investigation Confirms That Brian Williams Told Many Lies

As I said...NONE of the people on your "list" MADEUP THEIR RESUME /LIFE EXPERIENCES....keep dancing...it's really fun to watch.
Click to expand...

Williams' downfall was well documented. I don't believe anyone (left, right or center) ever defended him, nor felt pity for him. However, the idea that he "made up his entire resume", is (unfortunately) just a blatant lie. That's YOUR problem, here. And you know it. So if you can't admit that you were WRONG about something as obvious as that, then you are a liar, as well. And please stop whining. That's just "truth calling". Brian Williams' "entire resume" was not fabricated. Period. End of discussion.

Now, to the others.
Newt's downfall was also well-documented, and much more disgraceful than Williams'.
As was O'Reilly's.
As was Ailes'.
etc. etc.

Now, tell me, which network employed them again? Let me see you say it, in writing, please.
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

Grokmaster said:
Hey, it's an Alinsky disciple... again...desperately trying to CHANGE THE TOPIC.
Click to expand...

This Alinsky guy really gets under conservatives’ skin, doesn’t he?
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

Grokmaster said:
No irony involved. The person it was directed at did exactly as I described.

I am MORE THAN HAPPY to debate the points.,. the DP left seems to be "retreating" into personal attacks and Strawman nonsense...
Click to expand...

:lamoOf course you don't get the obvious irony.

Few of your ilk would. It comes with the territory, lol.

But you aren't trying to debate your point. You're trying (and failing) to sound intelligent.
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

Bucky said:
'You're Exploiting Her and You Know That': Tucker Battles Avenatti LIVE on Set | Fox News Insider

Ha ha. Tucker 1, Creepy porn lawyer 0.
Click to expand...

I watched it. Your scoring system is bogus. Avenatti totally destroyed Tucker.


What were Tucker's main point?

Tucker claims that Avenatti is exploiting his client.
He gave her free legal representation and he got publicity out of it. How is that exploitation?

+0 Tucker

Tucker claims that Avenatti is somehow responsible for his client working as a stripper.
Avenatti is her lawyer, not her life coach or parent. That Avenatti is richer and she's working strip clubs is irrelevant.

+0 Tucker

What were Avenattis' points?

Tucker is a hypocrite for calling her a porn star yet saying nothing about Trump's moral turpitude in having unprotected sex with a porn star while his wife cares for a 4-month-old child.

+1 Avenatti

Trump is a liar. Tucker admits Trump had the affair but is reluctant to admit that Trump lied to the American people and is a liar.

+1 Avenatti


Avenatti 2 Tucker 0

If you think Tucker won, I'd love to see your scorecard.
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

Bucky said:
'You're Exploiting Her and You Know That': Tucker Battles Avenatti LIVE on Set | Fox News Insider

Ha ha. Tucker 1, Creepy porn lawyer 0.
Click to expand...

Nonsense. Carlson 0 Avanatti 2

First, he demonstrated how Carlson is a hypocrite calling him a creepy porn lawyer, when it was Trump who slept with the porn star, without a condom, and while his wife was four months pregnant, but Carlson doesn't call Trump the creepy porn president.

Second, right off the bat Avanatti got Carlson to admit that Carlson agreed not to interrupt Avanatti, and then we watched Carlson do nothing but interrupt Avanatti throughout the entire interview, demonstrating that Carlson is not a man of his word.


Speaking which, when are you going to start calling Trump the "creepy porn president", or are you a hypocrite too Bucky?
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

SonOfDaedalus said:
I watched it. Your scoring system is bogus. Avenatti totally destroyed Tucker.


What were Tucker's main point?

Tucker claims that Avenatti is exploiting his client.
He gave her free legal representation and he got publicity out of it. How is that exploitation?

+0 Tucker

Tucker claims that Avenatti is somehow responsible for his client working as a stripper.
Avenatti is her lawyer, not her life coach or parent. That Avenatti is richer and she's working strip clubs is irrelevant.

+0 Tucker

What were Avenattis' points?

Tucker is a hypocrite for calling her a porn star yet saying nothing about Trump's moral turpitude in having unprotected sex with a porn star while his wife cares for a 4-month-old child.

+1 Avenatti

Trump is a liar. Tucker admits Trump had the affair but is reluctant to admit that Trump lied to the American people and is a liar.

+1 Avenatti


Avenatti 2 Tucker 0

If you think Tucker won, I'd love to see your scorecard.
Click to expand...

Oh I missed one of those, Tucker trying not to admit that Trump lied to the American people.

So Avenatti 3 Tucker 0 (See post #39) Poor Tucker got his ass kicked.


EDIT: P.S. Read the FOX News article that is linked to. They try to use as much slanted language as possible, but even in the article it's plain Avenatti came off better.
 
Last edited:
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

Grokmaster said:
No irony involved.

You said: "Oh look!! Another DP leftist who can no longer debate its asinine position, reduced to personal insults."

And then you went on to use personal insults.

That's irony mate.
Click to expand...
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

Blue Dog said:
Oh please, I have an opinion about Avenatti and you don’t agree. That’s all. I also think President Trump is a narcissistic mountebank.

Any questions?
Click to expand...
You just keep jumping to preconceived conclusions. Who said I didn't agree? I simply pointed out the irony of your original remarks.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

Moderator's Warning:
Okey doke guys. The topic is not each other. Knock off the snarking and off-topic discussion to the exclusion of the topic. Those who won't abide, will find themselves on the outside with the blinds pulled. Otherwise known as a thread ban.
 
Bucky said:
'You're Exploiting Her and You Know That': Tucker Battles Avenatti LIVE on Set | Fox News Insider

Ha ha. Tucker 1, Creepy porn lawyer 0.
Click to expand...

1. Avenatti didn't have sex with the porn actress
2. Avenatti wasn't accused of sexual misconduct from 22 different women
3. Avenatti didn't brag about his celebrity giving him the right to grab women's ******s
4. Avenatti didn't walk into the dressing room of teen pageant contestants while they were in various states of undress
5. Avenatti didn't brag that he would date his daughter if he weren't her father
6. Avenatti didn't offer proof that he couldn't have sexually assaulted a woman because she wasn't pretty enough for him

Now who did you say it was who was a creep?

Stormy Lawyer 1, dumb right wing TV host 0.
 
Last edited:
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

ultmd said:
You just keep jumping to preconceived conclusions. Who said I didn't agree? I simply pointed out the irony of your original remarks.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Actually we both did, but we are making progress. :)
 
OscarLevant said:
1. Avenatti didn't have sex with the porn actress
2. Avenatti wasn't accused of sexual misconduct from 22 different women
3. Avenatti didn't brag about his celebrity giving him the right to grab women's ******s
4. Avenatti didn't walk into the dressing room of teen pageant contestants while they were in various states of undress
5. Avenatti didn't brag that he would date his daughter if he weren't her father
6. Avenatti didn't offer proof that he couldn't have sexually assaulted a woman because she wasn't pretty enough for him

Now who did you say it was who was a creep?

Stormy Lawyer 1, dumb right wing TV host 0.
Click to expand...

Tucker is about as dumb as they come....
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

JustHanging said:
The sad part is that Creepy porn lawyer is still not 1/2 as creepy as Trump, your POTUS.

74910.jpg


Trump's Creepy Ivanka Comments
Click to expand...

A father taking a picture with his daughter is creepy. TDS


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Re: Tucker Battles Avenatti

Slyfox696 said:
If there really was ever a mainstream media outlet that was "Fake News", Fox News continually shows it proudly takes up the mantle.
Click to expand...

How is a 'live' program fake news?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom