• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

This countryis lucky that at least not everyone is mentally ill in the White house

apdst said:
You best worry about how this looks. It confirms the existance of the deep state. Combine that with everything else that's illegally taking place in order to undrrmine a legitimately elected president; the people won't stand for that bull****.
Click to expand...

It's not a Deep State. It's a Shallow President.

The president is incompetent like a child emperor who needs his advisors to act on his behalf. Trump's presidency is imploding.
 
jbander said:
As we speak the majority of this country wants your piece of **** impeached and buddy impeaching a person is in the constitution. and criminal law effects scum bag also. He's going down but it's because of him not because of something else.
Click to expand...

That's a lie.
 
AlphaOmega said:
lol no of course progs dont say things like have trials etc.they just shoot people while they are playing baseball if they dont like them.

lol now the majority of people want trump impeached. He says as he puts his foil hat on.
Click to expand...
I'm standing on firm ground your standing on soft manure supporting your pile of **** leader.
 
jbander said:
Its feels good that there is a group of people in the white house trying to get in the way of the presidents insanity and the actions that go with it. The insider letter to the media saying they are restraining this hate driven mental case is helpful but what really needs to happen is that the president has to go, I think the fastest route will be through his criminal activity being brought up in total in the Mueller investigation. He's the plum that the investigation is working toward . A total all encompassing charge against the president The biggest threat this country has had in many decades is this cruel evil person that they elected as their leader. It's my opinion that something will have to be done to the party that would elect this type of monster. I have no ideas on that, I just see the need.
Click to expand...

But the country is very unlucky that the big kahuna is.
 
jbander said:
I'm standing on firm ground your standing on soft manure supporting your pile of **** leader.
Click to expand...

Sorry you dont get to impeach Presidents because your parents never taught you that losing may be a possibility at sometimes. Ive never seen such failed human behavior as Ive seen demonstrated by the left after getting their asses handed to them at the last election. You guys are still whining about it 2 years later, making up fake russia stories, pee stories and now standing behind anonymous op eds. Lets demonstrate your beta male argument. Give me the factual reason you believe Trump should be impeached. I said...factual...as in you need facts to back it up.
 
jbander said:
"she compared people to terrorists for supporting legislation to limit abortions to 20 weeks or less, so I knew she was not going to represent what I hoped." This is the circumstance of her quote that she is talking about The president no the party. "After calling out former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, and Ohio Gov. John Kasich by name for their campaign promises to ban all abortions with no exceptions for rape, incest or the life of the mother, Clinton continued: “Now extreme views on women, we expect that from some of the terrorist groups, we expect that from people who don’t want to live in the modern world, but it’s a little hard to take coming from Republicans who want to be the president of the United States.”" So you are a one issue voter and your wrong about the one issue.
Click to expand...



I am not a one-issue voter.

I may be mistaken about the context of her quote ... I'll have to look it up. I'm pretty sure you're wrong though about any of those men making that campaign promise, much less all three making it. Be right back ....


Nope, that wasn't Jeb Bush's position: Jeb Bush on the Issues. His position was extreme, but not as extreme as you say: Abortion ok when LIFE of mother at risk, not just her HEALTH. (Nov 2015)

Nope, that wasn't Marco Rubio's position: Marco Rubio on the Issues. Ban abortion after 20 weeks. (Apr 2015), Abortion is complex issue; we must reduce the number of them. (Aug 2015). Apparently Rubio said something more extreme in 2014, and tossed out a red meat quote in 2015, but no campaign promise to ban all abortions with no exceptions.

Nope, that wasn't John Kasich's position: John Kasich on the Issues. Reasonable exceptions, but respect other opinions. (Aug 2015).


The issue I remember most recently in the news at that time was the 20-week limit being considered in Congress. Whatever her "context" was, it was a gratuitous red meat hit on three candidates with more moderate positions than you or Hillary claim/suggest. There was no call for the terrorist comparison. I was a Republican who was thinking about crossing party lines for 2016, and I needed reassurance, and Hillary was the opposite of reassuring. Just think how she appeared to Republicans and Independents who weren't as close to considering Democrats as I was.

If I was anything like a one-issue voter, my one issue at that time would have been whether the candidate was likely to heal the partisan wounds of our country. And Hillary failed that first test. She later failed so many subsequent tests that she lost the election to Donald Trump. It took a whole lot of fail to accomplish that. My vote didn't do it. I voted for Democrats for every other race in 2016, and they lost each and every one.
 
AlphaOmega said:
Sorry you dont get to impeach Presidents because your parents never taught you that losing may be a possibility at sometimes. Ive never seen such failed human behavior as Ive seen demonstrated by the left after getting their asses handed to them at the last election. You guys are still whining about it 2 years later, making up fake russia stories, pee stories and now standing behind anonymous op eds. Lets demonstrate your beta male argument. Give me the factual reason you believe Trump should be impeached. I said...factual...as in you need facts to back it up.
Click to expand...
God Your boring
 
markjs said:
images
Click to expand...

That's the Clinton Library..obviously.
 
AlphaOmega said:
so you blindly believe anonymous sources printed by known biased fake news spreaders and ponder others mental abilities. Priceless.
Click to expand...

Welcome to Leftgoofyworld.

Kelly, Mattis, Dowd, are "NOT CREDIBLE", but an UNNAMED, UNVERIFIED , SELF SERVING DRAMA QUEEN IS....
 
Grokmaster said:
Welcome to Leftgoofyworld.

Kelly, Mattis, Dowd, are "NOT CREDIBLE", but an UNNAMED, UNVERIFIED , SELF SERVING DRAMA QUEEN IS....
Click to expand...

lol thanks, its ripe here with all sorts of nuggets to T off on! Good to see you here grok!
 
Amelia said:
I am not a one-issue voter.

I may be mistaken about the context of her quote ... I'll have to look it up. I'm pretty sure you're wrong though about any of those men making that campaign promise, much less all three making it. Be right back ....


Nope, that wasn't Jeb Bush's position: Jeb Bush on the Issues. His position was extreme, but not as extreme as you say: Abortion ok when LIFE of mother at risk, not just her HEALTH. (Nov 2015)

Nope, that wasn't Marco Rubio's position: Marco Rubio on the Issues. Ban abortion after 20 weeks. (Apr 2015), Abortion is complex issue; we must reduce the number of them. (Aug 2015). Apparently Rubio said something more extreme in 2014, and tossed out a red meat quote in 2015, but no campaign promise to ban all abortions with no exceptions.

Nope, that wasn't John Kasich's position: John Kasich on the Issues. Reasonable exceptions, but respect other opinions. (Aug 2015).


The issue I remember most recently in the news at that time was the 20-week limit being considered in Congress. Whatever her "context" was, it was a gratuitous red meat hit on three candidates with more moderate positions than you or Hillary claim/suggest. There was no call for the terrorist comparison. I was a Republican who was thinking about crossing party lines for 2016, and I needed reassurance, and Hillary was the opposite of reassuring. Just think how she appeared to Republicans and Independents who weren't as close to considering Democrats as I was.

If I was anything like a one-issue voter, my one issue at that time would have been whether the candidate was likely to heal the partisan wounds of our country. And Hillary failed that first test. She later failed so many subsequent tests that she lost the election to Donald Trump. It took a whole lot of fail to accomplish that. My vo but thats not the pointte didn't do it. I voted for Democrats for every other race in 2016, and they lost each and every one.
Click to expand...
Lady do your know what quotation marks mean when it is around a comment, I never said anything about those three candidates myself , I put it into reference With quotation marks to what Hillary said that you claimed and were totally 100 % wrong about. from a source that said it not me. Your a one issue voter being wrong about the one issue you commented about. I looked into the positions of Rubio and what I found is that he said he never supported excluding anyone for any reason. He wanted a total ban, Was it his presidential issue? maybe no but it was from his history something he had said he said , which means more by any standard. My point is still supported that the lies about the character of Hillary Clinton is made up from the rights attack on her because she has been seen as the next Dem candidate. 75% bull**** including your idea of what she said and 25% truth that puts her a whole league about the creep that's in there now. I'm done here, you get the last word.
 
Grokmaster said:
That's the Clinton Library..obviously.
Click to expand...
You either contribute something here or your out of here. I ban the people who just come in with their silly name calling threats and nonsense , which include cartoons. No one has time for you people ,you just waste bandwidth.
 
jbander said:
As we speak the majority of this country wants your piece of **** impeached and buddy impeaching a person is in the constitution. and criminal law effects scum bag also. He's going down but it's because of him not because of something else.
Click to expand...

Do you understand the impeachment process, and all the possible outcomes? Which, BTW, doesn't mean you get to pick his replacement if it came down to it.
 
jbander said:
Lady do your know what quotation marks mean when it is around a comment, I never said anything about those three candidates myself , I put it into reference With quotation marks to what Hillary said that you claimed and were totally 100 % wrong about. from a source that said it not me. Your a one issue voter being wrong about the one issue you commented about. I looked into the positions of Rubio and what I found is that he said he never supported excluding anyone for any reason. He wanted a total ban, Was it his presidential issue? maybe no but it was from his history something he had said he said , which means more by any standard. My point is still supported that the lies about the character of Hillary Clinton is made up from the rights attack on her because she has been seen as the next Dem candidate. 75% bull**** including your idea of what she said and 25% truth that puts her a whole league about the creep that's in there now. I'm done here, you get the last word.
Click to expand...


Oh darn. I was going to ask you to articulate what you think my "one issue" is.

Oh well, some other day.
 
jbander said:
Its feels good that there is a group of people in the white house trying to get in the way of the presidents insanity and the actions that go with it. The insider letter to the media saying they are restraining this hate driven mental case is helpful but what really needs to happen is that the president has to go, I think the fastest route will be through his criminal activity being brought up in total in the Mueller investigation. He's the plum that the investigation is working toward . A total all encompassing charge against the president The biggest threat this country has had in many decades is this cruel evil person that they elected as their leader. It's my opinion that something will have to be done to the party that would elect this type of monster. I have no ideas on that, I just see the need.
Click to expand...

I've been leaning back and forth all day about the author of the editorial. At first I thought it would be better if he quit in protest and even better if his fellow patriots joined him in a mass resignation. In a perfect world I still think that would be the right thing to do, but we're far from a perfect world.

If the leaders of his own party had the principles and balls to value their country over their jobs and come out against Trump, like the Repubs did to Nixon, their resignation could do some good. But they have neither and nothing would be done.

So rather than making a statement that confirms what everyone knows anyway and would accomplish nothing, I believe it's better to have anonymous patriots keeping the paranoid from acting on his worst impulses based on ignorance or lack of self control...

Amelia said:
...But he thought Trump was sane and would bring good business sense to the White House. Now he sees he was wrong about Trump. But he still doesn't think he was wrong about Hillary...
Click to expand...

While I don't believe Hillary was anywhere near as bad as Trump, at least your husband had the brains and courage to realize he was wrong about Trump. That's an incredibly rare thing in Republican circles and it's becoming more rare everyday.

Kudos to your husband...
 
Last edited:
Grokmaster said:
Welcome to Leftgoofyworld.

Kelly, Mattis, Dowd, are "NOT CREDIBLE", but an UNNAMED, UNVERIFIED , SELF SERVING DRAMA QUEEN IS....
Click to expand...

The Kelly claim came up months ago, it's not new. And others heard it (when he called The Donald an idiot).

It's very easy to believe, based on plenty of other evidence.
 
GottaGo said:
Do you understand the impeachment process, and all the possible outcomes? Which, BTW, doesn't mean you get to pick his replacement if it came down to it.
Click to expand...

IMO unless we can nail him blatantly as guilty on a crime or have him verified by multiple Drs as insane/incompetent, it would be a mistake to impeach him.

If there isnt black and white guilt/cause...the Trump supporters will go nuts... And I really dont think it's possible to convince them that he is guilty or incompetent....they refuse to examine and believe anything that's negative (or justify it away, like the filthy way he discusses women).
 
GottaGo said:
Do you understand the impeachment process, and all the possible outcomes? Which, BTW, doesn't mean you get to pick his replacement if it came down to it.
Click to expand...
I have no reason to care one way or another , he's going down when Mueller hands him a list of years of criminal activity by this pile of **** president. It will be a deal at that point. Guess what that deal would be,
 
Lursa said:
IMO unless we can nail him blatantly as guilty on a crime or have him verified by multiple Drs as insane/incompetent, it would be a mistake to impeach him.

If there isnt black and white guilt/cause...the Trump supporters will go nuts... And I really dont think it's possible to convince them that he is guilty or incompetent....they refuse to examine and believe anything that's negative (or justify it away, like the filthy way he discusses women).
Click to expand...

The man is lewd, crude and a twit. Last I looked, that doesn't make him eligible for impeachment.

The man is seriously iffy on the morals, but actions prior to his presidency are not impeachable.

I don't view Trump as sane/insane, sanity really is quite subjective. I think he's got a case of ADHD going on, but that is also not grounds for an 25th Amendment call.

We will survive this presidency, just like we survived the last.
 
jbander said:
I have no reason to care one way or another , he's going down when Mueller hands him a list of years of criminal activity by this pile of **** president. It will be a deal at that point. Guess what that deal would be,
Click to expand...

So your answer would be no, you do not know the grounds for impeachment, nor the actions that may because by and action of impeachment. May I recommend reading up on it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom