• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump wants Sessions to protect crooked Republican politicians (1 Viewer)

SonOfDaedalus

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 13, 2017
Messages
13,568
Reaction score
8,485
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
Trump Twitter attack on Sessions and Justice is most serious impeachment fodder yet

That’s it. Line crossed.

It came Monday when President Donald Trump tweeted: “Two long running, Obama era, investigations of two very popular Republican Congressmen were brought to a well publicized charge, just ahead of the Mid-Terms, by the Jeff Sessions Justice Department. Two easy wins now in doubt because there is not enough time. Good job Jeff......”

In other words, President Trump is now angry that Attorney General Sessions did not put party politics ahead of enforcing the law. He thinks that the Justice Department should have suppressed the charges against Reps. Chris Collins of New York and Duncan Hunter of California because bringing those charges might cost Republicans two safe House seats.

This is exactly what the rule of law does not look like.

This is the most corrupt administration in American history. Drain the swamp? Law and order president?
 
These guys are real knuckleheads. Hard for Sessions not to prosecute.

I do blame Sessions in one sense, he should have sat down with Trump and explained...real slow like, what obstruction of justice is and for Trump to leave Comey out of Trump's business.
 
Trump makes Nixon look like a freakin genius and a paragon of virtue.
Nixon was a very smart man, though hardly a paragon of virtue. Flawed as he was, he outclassed Trump by light years.
 
Nixon was a very smart man, though hardly a paragon of virtue. Flawed as he was, he outclassed Trump by light years.

Agreed.

His accomplishment with China is a mountain next to the Trump effort with North Korea which is a comparative molehill.
 
It's obvious that if any other elected leader in a Western democracy tried to suggest to his/her top law enforcement official to shield their political allies from prosecution for political reasons like this, he/she would be ousted or forced out within a day.

Yep, any other president would be immediately facing impeachment. But this is not even big news in Crazy Town today.
 
Nixon was a very smart man, though hardly a paragon of virtue. Flawed as he was, he outclassed Trump by light years.

Nixon was crooked but intelligence. Everyone in the White House says Trump is a moron. Only the Trump cult members refuse to admit that Trump is a moron.
 
It's obvious that if any other elected leader in a Western democracy tried to suggest to his/her top law enforcement official to shield their political allies from prosecution for political reasons like this, he/she would be ousted or forced out within a day.

Are you sure? Attorney General Eric Holder brushed off a question Thursday about when he might leave the administration.
Instead, the top lawman professed his allegiance to President Barack Obama.
"I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done. I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy.

https://www.politico.com/blogs/politico44/2013/04/eric-holder-im-still-the-presidents-wingman-160861

I'm sure Trump expected similar 'allegiance' from Sessions
 
Are you sure? Attorney General Eric Holder brushed off a question Thursday about when he might leave the administration.
Instead, the top lawman professed his allegiance to President Barack Obama.
"I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done. I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy.

https://www.politico.com/blogs/politico44/2013/04/eric-holder-im-still-the-presidents-wingman-160861

I'm sure Trump expected similar 'allegiance' from Sessions


Holder was speaking in the context of the administration's civil rights and anti-corruption agendas as compared to using the agency to shield the President from the consequences of his own corruption.
 
Are you sure? Attorney General Eric Holder brushed off a question Thursday about when he might leave the administration.
Instead, the top lawman professed his allegiance to President Barack Obama.
"I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done. I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy.

https://www.politico.com/blogs/politico44/2013/04/eric-holder-im-still-the-presidents-wingman-160861

I'm sure Trump expected similar 'allegiance' from Sessions

Have someone explain 'context' to you.
 
Of all the whacked out tweets Trump has sent, this one on the Justice Dept and the two congressmen was the scariest of the lot. Its not even close.
 
Nixon was a very smart man, though hardly a paragon of virtue. Flawed as he was, he outclassed Trump by light years.

Nixon was the brightest of all the presidents in my lifetime & he along with Kissinger in Kissinger's prime were the best foreign
policy tandem in US history with the possible exceptions of the big war presidents of Washington, Wilson & FDR. Nixon was the only 2 term
president in history who never had a majority of his party in either the house or senate & that made him vulnerable.
His huge 18 million vote majority made him feel invulnerable & that along with his ability to make enemies lead to his downfall.

If not for Wagergate which I believe it has been established he originally knew nothing about he would have gone down
as a top tier president so I can't understand why those who berate Trump bring up Nixon. bring up Bush#2 or Buchanan
as woefully incompetent not Nixon
 
Nixon was the brightest of all the presidents in my lifetime & he along with Kissinger in Kissinger's prime were the best foreign
policy tandem in US history with the possible exceptions of the big war presidents of Washington, Wilson & FDR. Nixon was the only 2 term
president in history who never had a majority of his party in either the house or senate & that made him vulnerable.
His huge 18 million vote majority made him feel invulnerable & that along with his ability to make enemies lead to his downfall.

If not for Wagergate which I believe it has been established he originally knew nothing about he would have gone down
as a top tier president so I can't understand why those who berate Trump bring up Nixon. bring up Bush#2 or Buchanan
as woefully incompetent not Nixon

In large part I agree with regard to Nixon and his impact on Foreign relations. But he set up the plumbers...even directly ordered its activities on occasion. It is hard to make a case for lack of foreknowledge when Nixon immediately set about Obstructing any effort to flush through the entire Watergate affair virtually as soon as it happened. I honestly don't care whether he had specific foreknowledge of the Watergate brake in given his involvement with the plumbers before the break in and his Obstruction of efforts to bring the entire miserable bunch to justice after the Watergate break in. He did more to abuse his Executive Powers than any President I can think of ....until Donald who is a walking talking Obstruction of Justice and Abuse of Executive Power.

Just to be clear, Abuse of Power is not the same thing as overstepping Executive Authority. A President can abuse his Executive Powers without overstepping his Executive Authority. Abuse of Power has more to do with criminal intent or malfeasance than it has to do with whether or not a President has overstepped his Executive Authority.
 
Have someone explain 'context' to you.

Oh, by all means , please provide us with the "context:" than CHANGES THIS:

" the top lawman professed his allegiance to President Barack Obama.
"I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done. I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy. "
 
Oh, by all means , please provide us with the "context:" than CHANGES THIS:

" the top lawman professed his allegiance to President Barack Obama.
"I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done. I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy. "

Irrelevant to what I posted.

I accept your surrender.
 
Irrelevant to what I posted.

I accept your surrender.


Right. "Not relevant"? HOW SO?

First:

[
B]Quote Originally Posted by slick View Post [/B]

Are you sure? Attorney General Eric Holder brushed off a question Thursday about when he might leave the administration.
Instead, the top lawman professed his allegiance to President Barack Obama.
"I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done. I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy.

https://www.politico.com/blogs/polit...wingman-160861

I'm sure Trump expected similar 'allegiance' from Sessions.



And you responded:



Quote Originally Posted by Tanngrisnir View Post

Have someone explain 'context' to you.


To which I responded:

Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post

Oh, by all means , please provide us with the "context:" than CHANGES THIS:

" the top lawman professed his allegiance to President Barack Obama.
"I’m still enjoying what I’m doing, there’s still work to be done. I’m still the President’s wing-man, so I’m there with my boy. "


And you delude this = "surrender" on my part.

Yeah...you being UTTERLY INCAPABLE of backing up your claim = "my surrender".


Have someone explain logic/linear thought to you.
 
Right. "Not relevant"? HOW SO?

First:

[



And you responded:






To which I responded:




And you delude this = "surrender" on my part.

Yeah...you being UTTERLY INCAPABLE of backing up your claim = "my surrender".


Have someone explain logic/linear thought to you.

Yet again irrelevant to what I posted. This seems really difficult for you.

And logic? LOL! You and logic remain mercifully and hilariously unacquainted.

I happily accept your second surrender.
 
Yet again irrelevant to what I posted. This seems really difficult for you.

And logic? LOL! You and logic remain mercifully and hilariously unacquainted.

I happily accept your second surrender.


Yes, of course. Your suggestion that "CONTEXT" would , somehow , CHANGE Holder's quote, is not "relevant' to your being utterly uncapable of providing proof of that claim.

And my exposing it = "surrender". :)

Don't worry...I'm sure no one notices your complete failure to backup your claim ,and your subsequent attempted "dancing" to try to escape that fact.
 
Yes, of course. Your suggestion that "CONTEXT" would , somehow , CHANGE Holder's quote, is not "relevant' to your being utterly uncapable of providing proof of that claim.

And my exposing it = "surrender". :)

Don't worry...I'm sure no one notices your complete failure to backup your claim ,and your subsequent attempted "dancing" to try to escape that fact.

Yet again irrelevant to what I posted. This seems really difficult for you.

And logic? LOL! You and logic remain mercifully and hilariously unacquainted.

I happily accept your third surrender.
 
Nixon was the brightest of all the presidents in my lifetime & he along with Kissinger in Kissinger's prime were the best foreign
policy tandem in US history with the possible exceptions of the big war presidents of Washington, Wilson & FDR. Nixon was the only 2 term
president in history who never had a majority of his party in either the house or senate & that made him vulnerable.
His huge 18 million vote majority made him feel invulnerable & that along with his ability to make enemies lead to his downfall.

If not for Wagergate which I believe it has been established he originally knew nothing about he would have gone down
as a top tier president so I can't understand why those who berate Trump bring up Nixon. bring up Bush#2 or Buchanan
as woefully incompetent not Nixon

I agree that Nixon was a superbly competent president. I don't agree with all of his policies, but the man knew what he was doing. I never thought that he was a danger to the country, unlike now with Trump.
 
Yes, of course. Your suggestion that "CONTEXT" would , somehow , CHANGE Holder's quote, is not "relevant' to your being utterly uncapable of providing proof of that claim.

And my exposing it = "surrender". :)

Don't worry...I'm sure no one notices your complete failure to backup your claim ,and your subsequent attempted "dancing" to try to escape that fact.

Why bother with the contradiction the poster made a fictional claim attempting to turn the entire thread into an anti-Trump jamboree.
If you're trying to help him understand it's not working, it is turning into some heavy lifting.

Evidence supplied in post #9 more than disproved it. On to other matters.
 
Since Nixon protected the Environment, that would be one example.

Nixon was an enlightened conservative in a liberal Republican era, he fought off Rockefeller, Scranton & Romney to get
the 1968 nomination. He passed liberal policies such as the EPA & OSHA but I don't believe domestic policy was his forte
or main interest. Nixon's genius in foreign policy can be evidenced in many notable successful efferts:

1) True to his campaign promise Nixon removed all combat troops from Viet Nam, (the 3rd costliest war in US history
in troop deaths) after giving North Vietnam a heavy dose of B-52 bombing. Vietnamization of the War followed. When
he was removed from office the commies realized they didn't have Nixon to deal with anymore, Ford was a pushover & they pounced.

2) In his typical cunning, & sly way an event so unexpected that it created a phrase that’s become part of our political lexicon:
The shorthand is “Nixon goes to China,” meaning a moment in which a leader reverses his past positions to do
something that is shocking but beneficial.

3) Benefits of Nixon's détente policies to previous cold war strategies are obvious no need to elaborate

4) At the precise critically essential moment, when Israel refused to stop fighting until it had surrounded the
Egyptian Third Army, Nixon & Kissinger's SHUTTLE DIPLOMACY not interested in humiliating the Arabs brokered a truce
ending the Yom Kippor War. Craftily they managed to be accepted as a broker by the Arabs as well as the Israelis
and to draw back Soviet influence which before that time was prominent.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom