• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Scores of ex-spies join in rebuking Trump over security clearances

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,109
Reaction score
82,391
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Scores of ex-spies join in rebuking Trump over security clearances

httpscdn.cnn_.comcnnnextdamassets180816111618johnbrennantestifiessupertease.1.jpg-455x250.jpg

Former CIA Director John Brennan

8/17/18
An avalanche of retired senior intelligence officials and spies have joined more than a dozen of their former bosses in issuing a public rebuke of President Donald Trump’s decision to revoke the security clearance of John Brennan, the ex-CIA chief who has become a strong critic of the president. In a rare public campaign, a total of 60 former CIA station chiefs, analysts and operations officers — along with a former director of the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency and deputy director of the National Counterterrorism Center — declared on Friday afternoon their “firm belief that the country will be weakened if there is a political litmus test applied before seasoned experts are allowed to share their views.” “We believe equally strongly that former government officials have the right to express their unclassified views on what they see as critical national security issues without fear of being punished for doing so,” they added in a brief statement. The statement follows a similar one issued late Thursday by 11 former directors and deputy directors of the CIA and one director of national intelligence. They served in Democratic and Republican administrations, and decried the removal of the security clearance “as a political tool.” The back-to-back statements also follow a blistering op-ed by retired Navy Adm. William McRaven, who, in an act of solidarity with Brennan, appealed to Trump to revoke his security clearance, as well.

In his first live TV appearance since being stripped of his security clearance, Brennan told MSNBC on Friday that the president's move was "an egregious act" that "flies in the face of traditional practice, as well as common sense, as well as national security." Brennan said it was for those reasons, and not professional solidarity, that so many former members of America's intelligence apparatus felt compelled to speak out. "I think that's why there's been such an outcry from many intelligence professionals," he said. "Not to support me, but to support the principle that security clearances are something that's very, very solemn and sacred, and they never, ever should be used for political purposes — either to grant friends those clearances or to revoke clearances of your critics."

Again, Trump badly miscalculated as he always does in regard to the US Intelligence community.

Related: 60 ex-CIA officials tell Trump 'the country will be weakened' if a political litmus test is applied to experts
 
Deep state!
 
This is quite a stunning show of solidarity.

waiting for Mycroft to comment
 
Another distraction of Trump's is working. This is taking up media time while at the same time not being an issue most Americans care about. I have explained on multiple occasions here the utility of such people maintaining their clearances for at least a couple years after leaving office and it doesn't sink in because the clearance process isn't common knowledge. So to the average person at home the thought process is, "He isn't in the job anymore so why the hell does he need a clearance". It makes the former officials complaining about this action of Trump's look entitled and may even make the average person more sympathetic to Trump. Another successful distraction, IMO.
 
Like a centipede dropping shoes.......
 
Scores of ex-spies join in rebuking Trump over security clearances

httpscdn.cnn_.comcnnnextdamassets180816111618johnbrennantestifiessupertease.1.jpg-455x250.jpg

Former CIA Director John Brennan



Again, Trump badly miscalculated as he always does in regard to the US Intelligence community.

Related: 60 ex-CIA officials tell Trump 'the country will be weakened' if a political litmus test is applied to experts

Who cares what they think? And when did the left become so enamored with spy agencies? Wait, I think that started right around November of 2016
 
Another distraction of Trump's is working. This is taking up media time while at the same time not being an issue most Americans care about. I have explained on multiple occasions here the utility of such people maintaining their clearances for at least a couple years after leaving office and it doesn't sink in because the clearance process isn't common knowledge. So to the average person at home the thought process is, "He isn't in the job anymore so why the hell does he need a clearance". It makes the former officials complaining about this action of Trump's look entitled and may even make the average person more sympathetic to Trump. Another successful distraction, IMO.

Its only a 'distraction' because the loony left allowed themselves to become 'distracted' by a non-issue like this.
 
Who cares what they think? And when did the left become so enamored with spy agencies? Wait, I think that started right around November of 2016
You see, this is the problem with your argument. You label everyone who doesn't agree with your view point as leftist. That is just patently moronic. What matters is the reason for this removal of security clearance. It is purely for political reasons. There is zero national security concern at play here.

Let me ask you a question. When did you become so enamored with removal of security clearance of these folks that are no longer in government employment? Could it be a newly forced opinion in the past couple of months?
 
You see, this is the problem with your argument. You label everyone who doesn't agree with your view point as leftist.
I dont do that and I didnt do that here.
What matters is the reason for this removal of security clearance. It is purely for political reasons. There is zero national security concern at play here.
You are half right. Why he was removed is meaningless, but yes there is zero national security concern at play here.

Let me ask you a question. When did you become so enamored with removal of security clearance of these folks that are no longer in government employment? Could it be a newly forced opinion in the past couple of months?
I am not enamored with it. Its a non-issue
 
Back
Top Bottom