• We will be taking the forum down for maintenance at [5:15 am CDT] - in 15 minutes. We should be down less than 1 hour.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Karl Rove Chooses The Enemy of the People.

I agree that he didn't say "the free press" but he listed most of the free press as examples, right?

So, everyone but FOX News are the enemies of the people, would that be more accurate?

When there is only one outlet spared from this label, it makes that outlet a state propaganda arm.
The label stands, and attempts by the Right to "qualify" it are pathetic.
Enough with the orgasmic apologetics, Trump is wrong, his supporters are wrong, and future generations will condemn this act forever.
 
Your own link says otherwise;

"The FAKE NEWS media,” he wrote,

And then he NAMED four of the largest media outlets in the country
 
He named the free press and called them an enemy of the American people. THAT IS A FACT

You're not being truthful. He never mentioned the free press at all. He said FAKE NEWS, and (named who he thought fit that category).
 
You're not being truthful. He never mentioned the free press at all. He said FAKE NEWS, and (named who he thought fit that category).

He NAMED four of the LARGEST members of the free press. We kill our enemies …..that is why you are all splitting hairs over what he said
 
He NAMED four of the LARGEST members of the free press. We kill our enemies …..that is why you are all splitting hairs over what he said

And they all have published fake news about him.
You're the one who is splitting hairs and dishonestly misinterpreting what he said.

It won't wash so give it up.
 
And they all have published fake news about him.
You're the one who is splitting hairs and dishonestly misinterpreting what he said.

It won't wash so give it up.

ENEMIES OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

The largest members of the free press in this country. It is fascist to say such a thing
 
Stop lying. When you have to resort to lies to make 'arguments' you just make yourself look stupid and prove his point.

Watch the video. Otherwise you're talking out of your ass
 
His tweet...and your purposeful misrepresentation of his tweet. We call that a 'lie'. You should stop doing that.

I didn't place any iinterpretation on it. I just posted it. People can make of it what they will. You seem to have lost any semblance of reason.
 
I didn't place any iinterpretation on it. I just posted it. People can make of it what they will. You seem to have lost any semblance of reason.
No...I am stating the facts. You are promoting a lie. Trump never indicted 'the media'. He never indicted 'the news'. He SPECIFICALLY cited 'fake news'...an action similar to that taken by Obama when he publicly and often criticized Fox News.

Thems the facts...but you insist on lying. You do the exact same thing leftists do when they claim Trump called Mexicans rapists...also a lie. You do the same thing leftists do when they say Trump banned 'the Muslims' when the reality is he acted on the counsel fo Obamas HS director Jeh Johnson and barred people from 7 Muslim nations while still allowing 43 muslim nation business as usual status. You do the same thing people STILL do when they restate the lie that Trump said he 'grabbed women by the *****'. You lie...because without the lies, your poutrage is impotent and unfounded.
 
No...I am stating the facts. You are promoting a lie. Trump never indicted 'the media'. He never indicted 'the news'. He SPECIFICALLY cited 'fake news'...an action similar to that taken by Obama when he publicly and often criticized Fox News.

Thems the facts...but you insist on lying. You do the exact same thing leftists do when they claim Trump called Mexicans rapists...also a lie. You do the same thing leftists do when they say Trump banned 'the Muslims' when the reality is he acted on the counsel fo Obamas HS director Jeh Johnson and barred people from 7 Muslim nations while still allowing 43 muslim nation business as usual status. You do the same thing people STILL do when they restate the lie that Trump said he 'grabbed women by the *****'. You lie...because without the lies, your poutrage is impotent and unfounded.

Your every posts reeks of cognitive dissonance. I understand why Kelly-Ann and Huckerby just make bare-faced lies; it's in their job description, but you must think the world is just too stupid. Trump virtually created fake news with his birtherism, dancing Muslims on 911 and virtually every statement he's made in the public domain. Do you think that people don't listen to his words? You want us to believe that he didn't call Mexican rapists when we all saw and heard him say it. That he didn't side with Putin when we saw him do it. TDS isn't an affliction of those that dislike him, but of those who passionately love him to the point you have reached where you see white when he says black. He said you have to grab women by the *****. We heard him say it. You can call every single person who heard it a liar, but that just makes your rhetoric even more unhinged.
 
Your every posts reeks of cognitive dissonance. I understand why Kelly-Ann and Huckerby just make bare-faced lies; it's in their job description, but you must think the world is just too stupid. Trump virtually created fake news with his birtherism, dancing Muslims on 911 and virtually every statement he's made in the public domain. Do you think that people don't listen to his words? You want us to believe that he didn't call Mexican rapists when we all saw and heard him say it. That he didn't side with Putin when we saw him do it. TDS isn't an affliction of those that dislike him, but of those who passionately love him to the point you have reached where you see white when he says black. He said you have to grab women by the *****. We heard him say it. You can call every single person who heard it a liar, but that just makes your rhetoric even more unhinged.

*He said you have to grab women by the *****. We heard him say it.*

The actual quote;

"When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the *****. You can do anything.”

Maybe you should have your hearing checked.
 
*He said you have to grab women by the *****. We heard him say it.*

The actual quote;

"When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the *****. You can do anything.”

Maybe you should have your hearing checked.

Important not to slightly mix up the great man's immortal words.
 
*He said you have to grab women by the *****. We heard him say it.*

The actual quote;

"When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the *****. You can do anything.”

Maybe you should have your hearing checked.

Only someone with TDS can read that and claim the two are in any way different in meaning or intention. "Grab 'em by the *****." He's telling you to grab them by the *****! You cannot claim 1 means 2 and not expect people to laugh at your apologia.
 
Important not to slightly mix up the great man's immortal words.

It's more important to not make things up or obscure the context to fit a narrative.
 
Only someone with TDS can read that and claim the two are in any way different in meaning or intention. "Grab 'em by the *****." He's telling you to grab them by the *****! You cannot claim 1 means 2 and not expect people to laugh at your apologia.

*He's telling you to grab them by the *****!*

Nonsense, he saying you can if you're a star. Reading comprehension is your friend.
 
Nonsense, he saying you can if you're a star. Reading comprehension is your friend.

Mine's just fine. Yours seems filtered through rose-tinted spectacles. How the hell would he know you could do that bizarre and disgusting act if he hadn't tried it himself? Your contortions to absolve him of his excesses are frankly painful to watch. His Times Square murder claim seems to be the only true thing he's ever said.
 
It's more important to not make things up or obscure the context to fit a narrative.

It's up to the present generation to preserve his sagacity to the letter for when it appears in school books generations hence.
 
Mine's just fine. Yours seems filtered through rose-tinted spectacles. How the hell would he know you could do that bizarre and disgusting act if he hadn't tried it himself? Your contortions to absolve him of his excesses are frankly painful to watch. His Times Square murder claim seems to be the only true thing he's ever said.

*How the hell would he know*

Seriously ?? You might wanna get out in the real world more often or pay more attention. Some people will do and allow things to be done for the love of money/fame. You are familiar with the term "groupie" right ??
 
Back
Top Bottom