• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Crying 'pedophile' is the oldest propaganda trick in the book

Nobody is trying to normalize pedophilia. Anyone that is are in such a small minority, it's not remotely relevant. And SSM and Pedophilia are two entirely different things, not remotely close to being comparable. Your slippery slope nonsense is just that-- nonsense.

Well, pedophiles are trying to “normalize” pedophilia, but ain’t getting anywhere with it, since there’s a certain concept the slippery slope types always seem to forget when trying to draw that straight line from SSM to kid-diddling: CONSENT.
 
SSM is a deviant form of behavior that's been normalized, is it WCH? What a sad, ugly little thing to say...but I give you props for owning your homophobia.

Be glad I only call it deviant behavior....The Bible calls it an abomination.

Adults having sex with children is worse.
 
Be glad I only call it deviant behavior....The Bible calls it an abomination.

Adults having sex with children is worse.

LMAO still waiting for you to support your claims on how equal the fight for the rights of hetero/homosexuals equates to and be be used for legalizing child rape

we are waiting :)
 
I'm asking a yes or no question, regarding your opinion of Tom Hanks.
If you don't want to answer, just say so.

I have no opinion of whether Hanks is guilty or not. I love him as an actor so, I hope it's false.

However allowing himself to be part of a victim accusing scheme makes me suspicious.
 
Be glad I only call it deviant behavior....The Bible calls it an abomination.

Adults having sex with children is worse.

And unrelated...but why let that stop you from taking a shot at gay folks, amirite? :roll:

Do Christians everywhere a favor, and stop referencing the Bible when you wish to display your hatred. It goes against the main message (love), and makes things confusing for everyone. Just sayin'.
 
And unrelated...but why let that stop you from taking a shot at gay folks, amirite? :roll:

Do Christians everywhere a favor, and stop referencing the Bible when you wish to display your hatred. It goes against the main message (love), and makes things confusing for everyone. Just sayin'.

Yeh, the pedophiles want to love also.

Are you unaware of the recent firings in Hollywood over pedophiles coming out?
 
Yeh, the pedophiles want to love also.

And Christ would love them as well, and so should we. Doesn't mean we don't protect children from them.

But whatever, but, I feel like it's a waste of time speaking to you from a Christian perspective, as despite your posturing and weaponization of the Bible, you don't have a clue what it's about.
 
1.) Yeh, the pedophiles want to love also.
2.)Are you unaware of the recent firings in Hollywood over pedophiles coming out?

1.) you mean rape which has nothign to do with the equal rights of homo/heterosexuals
2.) which also has nothign to do with your bigotry of sexual orientation
 
And Christ would love them as well, and so should we. Doesn't mean we don't protect children from them.

But whatever, but, I feel like it's a waste of time speaking to you from a Christian perspective, as despite your posturing and weaponization of the Bible, you don't have a clue what it's about.

I would call your brand lazy Christianity....not wanting to bother fighting evils right in front of your face.

Sorry not going to love the evil.
 
I would call your brand lazy Christianity....not wanting to bother fighting evils right in front of your face.

Sorry not going to love the evil.

you have no power to judge other Christians nor do they care about your bigoted views
 
Last edited:
I would call your brand lazy Christianity....not wanting to bother fighting evils right in front of your face.

Sorry not going to love the evil.

[37] Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. [38] This is the first and great commandment. [39] And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. [40] On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.

Sorry, I don't see "love your neighbor, except for fags and diddlers" in there anywhere. Seems to me like "lazy Christianity" is when folks decide that certain parts of the Bible need not be heeded, because they do not validate their hatred. :shrug: It's always harder to love than to hate.
 
Sorry, I don't see "love your neighbor, except for fags and diddlers" in there anywhere. Seems to me like "lazy Christianity" is when folks decide that certain parts of the Bible need not be heeded, because they do not validate their hatred. :shrug: It's always harder to love than to hate.

You're suppose to rebuke evil and if they repent, forgive them and love them. You seem to want to simply overlook their evil deeds.
 
You're suppose to rebuke evil and if they repent, forgive them and love them. You seem to want to simply overlook their evil deeds.

I'm not a judge, and I accept that there is no one on Earth that can fully know the mind of God. It's not my job to judge or overlook, it's my job to love. Please see provided verse for top two commandments, directly quoting Jesus Christ, where he says "This is most important, this is second most important."

I'm sure you'll understand if I choose to heed his words over yours...
 
You're suppose to rebuke evil and if they repent, forgive them and love them. You seem to want to simply overlook their evil deeds.

You never rebuked the people responsible for the Pizzagate slander, did you?
 
ALMOST A YEAR ago, a woman accused Tom Hanks of sexually abusing her as a child and began posting reconstructed memories on Twitter. The accounts are disturbing and specific, but incomplete and unproven—something Hanks’ accuser attributes to the trauma-based mind control she believes herself a victim of. Even though (or perhaps, because) her claims remain unverified, the pedophilia allegations were quickly embraced by a group known for up-leveling whisperings of child abuse into full-blown scandal: devotees of the QAnon conspiracy.

Believers in the QAnon conspiracy hold that President Trump is a “brilliant four-dimensional chess player” using the Mueller investigation as a smokescreen to root out the murderous, Satanic, pedophilic deep state. (It’s a Trump-era catchall conspiracy: Pizzagate + Seth Rich + the Illuminati.) Hanks is the QAnon conspiracists' perfect target: A Hollywood A-lister who donates to Democrats and has been shielded from moral censure by monogamy and his preternaturally wholesome dad routine—until now. And QAnon has done what they do best: Trumpet the unconfirmed revelation until suddenly, in the eyes of internet search algorithms at least, Tom Hanks, America’s uncomplicated, unproblematic favorite, is a pedophile.

snip...

https://www.wired.com/story/crying-pedophile-is-the-oldest-propaganda-trick-in-the-book/

Me thinks the sexual deviants protesteth too much as the walls close in. Excusing eons of child rape and abuse as nothing but a political ploy.

All that inbreeding seems to have caught up with QAnon.
 
QAnon. Stands for "Queers Anonymous". They're afraid to come out.
 
Strange.

The article WCH linked is about QAnon using accusations of pedophilia as a propaganda tool. All WCH seems to want to do is attack homosexuals.
 
Yeh, the pedophiles want to love also.

Are you unaware of the recent firings in Hollywood over pedophiles coming out?

Such as?
 
Gunn wasn’t fired for being a pedophile. Try again, slowly.

He was fired for joking about pedophilia and making light of horrific sex crimes and perversion. Who is more guilty, the Jerry Sandusky criminals or the Bill Ayers, Kevin Jennings, and James Gunns of the world who laugh at it, make light of it and even support legalization of such perversion?
 
Last edited:
He was fired for joking about pedophilia and making light of horrific sex crimes and perversion. Who is more guilty, the Jerry Sandusky criminals or the Bill Ayers, Kevin Jennings, and James Gunns of the world who laugh at it, make light of it and even support legalization of such perversion?

Well, that’s a stupid question.

Also, none of the people you listed support the legaliztion of pedophelia. Keep digging.
 
That site is beyond odd. It will be interesting if we ever find out who is behind it.

The more pertinent question is why someone with this level of access couldn't find a web developer to come up with a better UI than that 1990s looking page. Yeesh.
 
Gunn wasn’t fired for being a pedophile. Try again, slowly.

He was fired for talking smack about raping some boy. Words will get you in trouble and also show people who you really are.
 
Back
Top Bottom