• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sam Nunberg claims Donald Trump never lied to him and always followed laws

F

FreeWits

Banned
Joined
Apr 23, 2018
Messages
1,920
Reaction score
279
Location
USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
On Meet The Press, Sam Nunberg claimed that Donald Trump would never lie to him and would always tell his financial guy to follow the laws so he wouldn't get fined: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...erg_president_trump_has_never_lied_to_me.html

It's pretty far-fetched to say that Trump followed the economic laws, yet colluded with Russia, and openly, to win the American Presidential election. This conspiracy theory is over!
 
FreeWits said:
On Meet The Press, Sam Nunberg claimed that Donald Trump would never lie to him and would always tell his financial guy to follow the laws so he wouldn't get fined: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...erg_president_trump_has_never_lied_to_me.html

It's pretty far-fetched to say that Trump followed the economic laws, yet colluded with Russia, and openly, to win the American Presidential election. This conspiracy theory is over!
Click to expand...
Is that the drunk who melted down and had a public breakdown on every cable news program on television some months back?

:googles:

Yep. Carry on.
 
LincolnRossiter said:
Is that the drunk who melted down and had a public breakdown on every cable news program on television some months back?

:googles:

Yep. Carry on.
Click to expand...

Lmao. That’s him. That was a **** show!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
LincolnRossiter said:
Is that the drunk who melted down and had a public breakdown on every cable news program on television some months back?

:googles:

Yep. Carry on.
Click to expand...

Typical anti-Trumper being more about who someone is than what someone is about. Ah, someone got drunk some months ago so clearly he should be believed on nothing ever again. Just remember, it was your anti-Trump side that invited him on the press.
 
FreeWits said:
On Meet The Press, Sam Nunberg claimed that Donald Trump would never lie to him and would always tell his financial guy to follow the laws so he wouldn't get fined: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...erg_president_trump_has_never_lied_to_me.html

It's pretty far-fetched to say that Trump followed the economic laws, yet colluded with Russia, and openly, to win the American Presidential election. This conspiracy theory is over!
Click to expand...

You should call mueller and tell him to end his investigation ASAP!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
PoliSciXtina said:
You should call mueller and tell him to end his investigation ASAP!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Nah, you'll find out Mueller has nothing after he spends a few more million, and I highly doubt you'll criticize Mueller when nothing comes against Trump from his investigation.
 
FreeWits said:
Typical anti-Trumper being more about who someone is than what someone is about. Ah, someone got drunk some months ago so clearly he should be believed on nothing ever again. Just remember, it was your anti-Trump side that invited him on the press.
Click to expand...

Typical trumper who believes every single one of trump’s minions and who is desperate to discredit mueller and the investigation any way that one can. Two can play that game.

You do realize that mueller doesn’t give a hoot about what nunberg is saying on meet the press? Or is that too difficult for you to comprehend...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
FreeWits said:
Typical anti-Trumper being more about who someone is than what someone is about. Ah, someone got drunk some months ago so clearly he should be believed on nothing ever again. Just remember, it was your anti-Trump side that invited him on the press.
Click to expand...
Yeah there're these thingys in the world called "reputation" and "credibility" that tend to matter in a person vouching for the character of another person. And this guy is Roger Stone's protegee who apparently gave serious consideration to thumbing his nose at Mueller, then selling out Trump and Stone, then just decided to get drunk and high and go on a 4-day cable news crawl where one poor anchor (I believe it was Erin Burnett) felt obliged to ask him if he was intoxicated and if he need some help.

If that's what he's "about," have at.
 
FreeWits said:
Nah, you'll find out Mueller has nothing after he spends a few more million, and I highly doubt you'll criticize Mueller when nothing comes against Trump from his investigation.
Click to expand...

Wrong. First of all, I’m already pretty impressed with mueller. If he says that trump is innocent on all fronts, I’ll believe it and trust the investigation’s findings. Can you say the same, if trump or anyone in his circle is found guilty?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Sam Nunberg is a card carrying kook and not much more than that. He has been so all over the map on any issue relating to his relationship with Trump that if you traced his various paths, you would no longer see landscape. You would just see your trace lines all blended together covering everything.
 
PoliSciXtina said:
Typical trumper who believes every single one of trump’s minions and who is desperate to discredit mueller and the investigation any way that one can. Two can play that game.

You do realize that mueller doesn’t give a hoot about what nunberg is saying on meet the press? Or is that too difficult for you to comprehend...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

How dare the substance of what I say disagree with the substance of what you say, right? I must be a typical Trumper! Now to actually credibly discredit what I said...well, I won't be holding my breath.
 
LincolnRossiter said:
Yeah there're these thingys in the world called "reputation" and "credibility" that tend to matter in a person vouching for the character of another person. And this guy is Roger Stone's protegee who apparently gave serious consideration to thumbing his nose at Mueller, then selling out Trump and Stone, then just decided to get drunk and high and go on a 4-day cable news crawl where one poor anchor (I believe it was Erin Burnett) felt obliged to ask him if he was intoxicated and if he need some help.

If that's what he's "about," have at.
Click to expand...

Ah, so if someone says something crying then they can never be believed again. Instead, we must go online and talk to people with real reputations.
 
PoliSciXtina said:
Wrong. First of all, I’m already pretty impressed with mueller. If he says that trump is innocent on all fronts, I’ll believe it and trust the investigation’s findings. Can you say the same, if trump or anyone in his circle is found guilty?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Unlike you, I don't make up my mind before hearing the reasoning for why they believe what they believe. Obviously, you don't care why one believes what they believe.
 
PoliSciXtina said:
Wrong. First of all, I’m already pretty impressed with mueller. If he says that trump is innocent on all fronts, I’ll believe it and trust the investigation’s findings. Can you say the same, if trump or anyone in his circle is found guilty? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Let the GOP run on defending Carter Page, Butina and Putin, Sam DuNCberg, all the Freedom Critters, everything MAGA Made in China, tariffs are great, windfall tax cuts for the Gilded, inflation at a 7-year high;

There’s more. A complete deconstruction and annihilation of our Foreign Policy, 8+ years of trying to take away health care, our friends are our enemies and our enemies our are friends, NOTHING on infrastructure,

Do we need a million plus IKEs or what, still no farm bill, threatened government shutdown, all happening in real time, proxy wars all over the world brought to us from Russia with Love; I’ll stop;

The only salvation we have right now will happen with a Pence/Kasich Nation, and it’s close. I saw this as a sophomore in college 44 years ago; exact same time-line
 
FreeWits said:
How dare the substance of what I say disagree with the substance of what you say, right? I must be a typical Trumper! Now to actually credibly discredit what I said...well, I won't be holding my breath.
Click to expand...

Oh please enlighten me. Which of your statements has credibility? Was it when you claimed that nunberg is telling the truth, therefore meaning, NO COLLUSION? Get off your high horse with the “how dare you” crap.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
PoliSciXtina said:
Oh please enlighten me. Which of your statements has credibility? Was it when you claimed that nunberg is telling the truth, therefore meaning, NO COLLUSION? Get off your high horse with the “how dare you” crap.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

LOL...The best you can do is just to claim I make no credible statements instead of objecting to anything I said. You're a bright one.
 
Linc said:
Let the GOP run on defending Carter Page, Butina and Putin, Sam DuNCberg, all the Freedom Critters, everything MAGA Made in China, tariffs are great, windfall tax cuts for the Gilded, inflation at a 7-year high;

There’s more. A complete deconstruction and annihilation of our Foreign Policy, 8+ years of trying to take away health care, our friends are our enemies and our enemies our are friends, NOTHING on infrastructure,

Do we need a million plus IKEs or what, still no farm bill, threatened government shutdown, all happening in real time, proxy wars all over the world brought to us from Russia with Love; I’ll stop;

The only salvation we have right now will happen with a Pence/Kasich Nation, and it’s close. I saw this as a sophomore in college 44 years ago; exact same time-line
Click to expand...

I’m beginning to lose my patience with these trump cultists. It’s not even a debate board anymore, it’s a conspiracy fantasy land board. Gone are the days when one can actually debate fact. It’s a damn shame.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
FreeWits said:
LOL...The best you can do is just to claim I make no credible statements instead of objecting to anything I said. You're a bright one.
Click to expand...

You can’t even point out your supposed “credible” statements. And thank you, I do consider myself rather bright. I still have a lot to learn but I think critically and base debate on facts and not silly fantasies :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
PoliSciXtina said:
Wrong. First of all, I’m already pretty impressed with mueller. If he says that trump is innocent on all fronts, I’ll believe it and trust the investigation’s findings. Can you say the same, if trump or anyone in his circle is found guilty?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

You already have complete 100% faith in the findings that hasn't even surfaced yet... Your confirmation bias is too strong; you have zero credibility...
 
PoliSciXtina said:
You can’t even point out your supposed “credible” statements. And thank you, I do consider myself rather bright. I still have a lot to learn but I think critically and base debate on facts and not silly fantasies :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

You mean I didn't, that doesn't mean I can't. To say that I can't is wrong, and I'll prove it. Sam Nunberg declared that Trump ran a lawful economic operation, did he not?
 
Hedgology said:
You already have complete 100% faith in the findings that hasn't even surfaced yet... Your confirmation bias is too strong; you have zero credibility...
Click to expand...

So now I’m the crazy one because I stated that I would accept the investigation’s findings, even if trump & co are innocent? Can you tell me what’s so wrong with that? You’re not going to accept them?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
FreeWits said:
You mean I didn't, that doesn't mean I can't. To say that I can't is wrong, and I'll prove it. Sam Nunberg declared that Trump ran a lawful economic operation, did he not?
Click to expand...

I don’t put all of my faith and trust in Sam Nunberg. I’m not sure why you would either. I will however trust the professionals of our Justice Department that are investigating these matters. I’m not sure why this is so hard to grasp?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
PoliSciXtina said:
I’m beginning to lose my patience with these trump cultists. It’s not even a debate board anymore, it’s a conspiracy fantasy land board. Gone are the days when one can actually debate fact. It’s a damn shame.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

You should take a look in the mirror at how you discuss issues. That may have something to do with how you are being received, given you are discussing with Trump supporters in a completely bad-faith manner. The more good-faith I use to discuss with you, the less far I will get, because the more you will abuse bad-faith discussion to shut down discussion. You are the problem here.
 
PoliSciXtina said:
Typical trumper who believes every single one of trump’s minions and who is desperate to discredit mueller and the investigation any way that one can. Two can play that game.

You do realize that mueller doesn’t give a hoot about what nunberg is saying on meet the press? Or is that too difficult for you to comprehend...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I'm sitting here watching and pondering some folks tell other folks what Meuller has and doesn't have,and how he will rule after the investigation is completed.I've yet 'to see one shred of evidence' where Meuller has released any of the info he's acquired.
 
PoliSciXtina said:
I don’t put all of my faith and trust in Sam Nunberg. I’m not sure why you would either. I will however trust the professionals of our Justice Department that are investigating these matters. I’m not sure why this is so hard to grasp?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I don't put ALL of my faith and trust in Sam Nunberg, either. He, however, was invited to a Left-leaning media outlet to talk about President Trump while being interviewed by an interviewer who dislikes President Trump, about a time Sam Nunberg was around Donald Trump. That information is relevant, but you don't consider it at all, seemingly because you didn't hear the information you wanted to hear. Sure, you'll trust professionals like Peter Strzok.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom