• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democrats Dump Moderates, Move Far Left

Oborosen said:
You must be talking about the alt-right, because I have yet to see that from any of the far right. Not even from the hardest of the tea party.
Click to expand...
To reference your signature, Obo, <Days since a far-leftist has lied:0> alt-leftists lie when they say only right-winged politics produce fascists.

Antifascists lie ALL THE TIME.

Maybe your point is alt-leftists refuse to acknowledge there is an alt-left? Is that your point?
 
Tigerace117 said:
The far right is just as much guilty of that as any other group you might name. All that talk about "culture wars" and whining about taking in people fleeing death squads and mass killings.
Click to expand...

How so? Because the amount of fraudulent claims only makes the process even harder to do.

I have pity for the people who actually are running from imminent danger. However more than enough of these people are lying to cause a direct issue of compliance. People are only claiming asylum when they are caught, or they have children that sometimes aren't even theirs. Which makes the process even more arduous.
 
cabse5 said:
To reference your signature, Obo, <Days since a far-leftist has lied:0> alt-leftists lie when they say only right-winged politics produce fascists.

Antifascists lie ALL THE TIME.

Maybe your point is alt-leftists refuse to acknowledge there is an alt-left? Is that your point?
Click to expand...

More of less. My link for the signature didn't take so I am stuck with this for now.

I was going to have a set of scrolling information, but the coding didn't work right.
 
fishnthec said:
Really Opie?

Your thread and your picture is what I refer to as proof of the ongoing onslaught of reality and is the perfect example of how the Russians used the internet to sow discord and fake news into the minds of Americans to inject hatred and sway peoples opinions of others.

And folks, don't be surprised to learn that every forum in this country has cells of Russian Agents disguised as common members that are ever present propagating junk like this in heavy doses daily.

For all we know dude, you are one of those scumbags yourself, as we see your reckless and irresponsible posts and contributions here on a daily basis.

These kinds of posts are exactly the same kinds of posts that got Facebook in trouble for allowing them to run unfettered and unquestioned by their management during the 2016 election cycle.

I seriously challenge the management of this forum to investigate members like you opie who seem to be running amuck even here in this forum as you spread your rhetoric.
Click to expand...

Wow, that is a lot of nothing in a big post.

As soon as you prove that his "rhetoric" is incorrect, then you might actually be on the right track to making a claim.
 
roguenuke said:
Conservative, highly. In fact, he's been described as "alt-right" by some.
Click to expand...
Paleoconservative would be the closest identifier given the age in which he was of influence.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
 
Fiddytree said:
Paleoconservative would be the closest identifier given the age in which he was of influence.

Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I think "paleoconservative" was also used. I have not seen "right-leaning libertarian" actually used to describe this individual though, except in this thread. I honestly believe that "paleo-libertarian" is simply an attempt to present paleoconservatives as not so radical, even though they maintain the same basic views, especially social views. The only difference I could maybe find would be whether states should control things (paleoconservatives) or corporations should (paleolibertarians), but there is a lot of cross over, leading to a very big crossover between the two.
 
cabse5 said:
He wasn't for the Iraq War, so, no, not alt-right.
Click to expand...

Where is being for the Iraq War a requirement to be "alt-right"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alt-right

In fact, from what I've read, that is an aspect of being neoconservative, which is considered an opposite position of alt-right, who tend to be isolationists when it comes to at least those sort of things.

Most of the people in charge of the government during the second Gulf War were considered neoconservatives or at least associated strongly with/listened to neoconservatives.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism#Notable_people_associated_with_neoconservatism
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom