• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Have you noticed what a hostile brat Strzok was?

I was already questioned by those same dingalings for 11 hours in a closed door session.
Then again for who knows how long, in the formal IG investigation of his conduct that looked at every aspect of the investigation and his communications, and all peers, subordinates, etc., related to it. And none found anything to show his bias affected his job.

Then they called him in again, to parade around while asking a smattering of stupid questions they already knew the answers to, while putting on a farciful show?
I agree, at that point, he had probably had enough. But he still sat there and answered, for the brief, brief...briefly...brief, no questions I reclaim my time! Funny stuff.

And every second question I answered with: "I can't answer that because of an ongoing investigation."
 
MRSA can be LETHAL—Making Russia Strong Again

We know the response from McConnellism if the political roles were reversed; all decade.

MRGA. Make Russia Great Again. That is what 45 is working for.
 
Have you noticed what a bunch of douchebags the repukes who were grilling him are?

You're seeing them that way because you're wearing your partisan lensed sunglasses. I'm just looking at them with my eyes. I see the Republicans questioning a very biased Trump hater, and if anything they're pulling their punches.
 
The GOP "congressman" made themselves utter jackasses in front of the American Public. They are ridiculous, and as one Congresswoman clearly stated...are in need of medication:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/life...hot-congressional-strzok-fest-2018/781914002/

You have to be careful not to read the braying Fake News when looking at this. USA Today is a member of that group. They will steer you way off the road of reason and history, and into the wilderness of Leftist make believe.
 
I assumed Strzok would keep his head down and be humble, denying most things and saying a lot of “can’t remembers”. While he did say “can’t remember” a lot, he wasn’t humble at all. In fact he reminded me of an ornery troll. He sat there like a trapped ork, furiously staring at his questioners with real hatred. His contempt and arrogance was mighty obvious. He stained the FBI and is clearly proud about it.

It’s also revealing that Mueller didn’t question him at all about his texts, about why he sent them and how biased they were. It means Mueller is as bad as Strzok, as we assumed all along.

A really bad day for the GOP yesterday got a whole lot worse today. :lol:
 
You're seeing them that way because you're wearing your partisan lensed sunglasses. I'm just looking at them with my eyes. I see the Republicans questioning a very biased Trump hater, and if anything they're pulling their punches.

Stupid Louie really pulled those punches. Actually he went way below the belt which shows just how partisan YOU are. Spare us all your BS. The repukes made themselves look like idiots.
 
MRGA. Make Russia Great Again. That is what 45 is working for.

I like describing dt—delirious tremors—as MRSA and again, since it’s a lethal medical condition, well beyond trump being a festering BOIL—Blatant Outrageous Irrational Liar.

Asbestos Don wants to MADA—Make America Die Again
 
What did I notice? the House Republicans making utter and compete fools of themselves. You might not have noticed but Rosenstein threw the gauntlet right in their faces today.
 
You have to be careful not to read the braying Fake News when looking at this. USA Today is a member of that group. They will steer you way off the road of reason and history, and into the wilderness of Leftist make believe.

I am reminded of the braying POTUS today accusing the Sun of being Fake News...and then they supplied the audio tapes of his interview. Perhaps you should take a second to see how far off course (the real course, not the alternative course) you are.

Besides, my post was not to feature USA Today, but rather their coverage of Steven Colbert...he had an hilarious covering of the Congressional hearing. I'm sure you think he is Fake News also....
 
Maybe you need new glasses?!?

Nope. Just got new ones actually. 20/20 with them. Clearly saw screwy Louie act like an asshole. But then again that's nothing new for a tea party whack job. Have you read some of his stuff"? Its unreal.

"The caribou very much enjoy the warmth the pipeline radiates. “So when they want to go on a date, they invite each other to head over to the pipeline,” he informed his colleagues. It’s apparently the equivalent of being wined and dined. And that has resulted in a tenfold caribou population boom, he concluded.
“So my real concern now ...if oil stops running through the pipeline...do we need a study to see how adversely the caribou would be affected if that warm oil ever quit flowing?” he asked." Screwy Louie.
 
Did you notice Raskin didn't have to work too hard? "I'm a dentist, so I know all about body language....!"

Yes, Paul Gosar "aka Gomer", one of the most stupid people in congress....that says a lot
 
I am reminded of the braying POTUS today accusing the Sun of being Fake News...and then they supplied the audio tapes of his interview. Perhaps you should take a second to see how far off course (the real course, not the alternative course) you are.

I’d be interested in that issue – I’m sure it will boil down to fake news again - do you have a link? I’ll take a look.

Besides, my post was not to feature USA Today, but rather their coverage of Steven Colbert...he had an hilarious covering of the Congressional hearing. I'm sure you think he is Fake News also....

Seriously?

I enjoy humor, and laugh along with Lefties who satirize Trump well, but Colbert isn’t very funny. His humor is laced with venom, which makes it sour. It’s like a nice glass of wine with arsenic mixed in. Not a drink you can enjoy, unless you’re as hateful as Colbert, who, let’s be honest, is obsessed with Trump. After I watched a few episodes I stopped. For a while for a joke I’d watch the intro. I would count from when the audience stop clapping to when he'd say the word 'Trump'. The average count is about ten seconds. I stopped because it was too predictable. Even when you change channels, if you go past Colbert he’s saying, “Trump…”

Have you ever seen a late show where the host harps so much about one person?
 
You have to be careful not to read the braying Fake News when looking at this. USA Today is a member of that group. They will steer you way off the road of reason and history, and into the wilderness of Leftist make believe.

Your are quite the Goebbels, however you won't be able to spread your gas lighting of "everyone is fake news except Fox" to competent people. You are exposing your weakness to allow your delusional perspective to constantly to be dictated to you by that state propaganda station you so adore....

More and more I am convinced you are Russian bot.....
 
I’d be interested in that issue – I’m sure it will boil down to fake news again - do you have a link? I’ll take a look.



Seriously?

I enjoy humor, and laugh along with Lefties who satirize Trump well, but Colbert isn’t very funny. His humor is laced with venom, which makes it sour. It’s like a nice glass of wine with arsenic mixed in. Not a drink you can enjoy, unless you’re as hateful as Colbert, who, let’s be honest, is obsessed with Trump. After I watched a few episodes I stopped. For a while for a joke I’d watch the intro. I would count from when the audience stop clapping to when he'd say the word 'Trump'. The average count is about ten seconds. I stopped because it was too predictable. Even when you change channels, if you go past Colbert he’s saying, “Trump…”

Have you ever seen a late show where the host harps so much about one person?

There are easily 50 links to POTUS's false statement about the Sun....I am sure you will find them all FAKE. So take a look for yourself. I doubt Fox covered it. Just Google Trump claims Fake News....lol

Colbert if funny. Trump is a treasure trove of late night materials. Trump might try to get to work and not be the laughingstock of the planet...but I think he enjoys the attention.
 
No it was the douchebag repukes. Clear as day. Saw the highlights on video myself. Total schmucks.

What empty dissimulative gasbaggery, that.

Imagine if it were Trump up there in front of the cameras, under the exact same circumstances as Strzok. Close your eyes and smile, cause you just know some self righteous Dem would not have refrained from having let fly in the very same fashion.

No? Get your nose outta your butt, then maybe you can wake up, smell the coffee.

It was actually a beautiful thing to witness. I had previously heard Louie similarly describe the smugness of the cheating ex lover liar's testimony from last week. Recognized that perfect oh no hes actually gonna do it tidal wave build up, the Gohmert kill shot as performed in Louie Louie style yesterday... aimed straight between the eyes of that cornered, wounded, smarmy and rabid I cannot answer on advice of my FBI attorneys as its a matter under current investigation chipmunk toothed scoundrel sitting before the committee.

The immediate yowls by those lemmings of the left were worth all the awkward discomfort of doing what any righteous person wishes they had the guts to do to almost any cheat. (Remember, for example, the 360 detail with which the Coop went into with Stormy?)

Yeah, good one Louie.
 
I assumed Strzok would keep his head down and be humble, denying most things and saying a lot of “can’t remembers”. While he did say “can’t remember” a lot, he wasn’t humble at all. In fact he reminded me of an ornery troll. He sat there like a trapped ork, furiously staring at his questioners with real hatred. His contempt and arrogance was mighty obvious. He stained the FBI and is clearly proud about it.

It’s also revealing that Mueller didn’t question him at all about his texts, about why he sent them and how biased they were. It means Mueller is as bad as Strzok, as we assumed all along.

You live in a fantasy world.
 
Anybody notice what a piece of **** Louie Gohmert was and is?

gawd he's awful. Easily my least favorite congressperson ever. Worse than Bachmann.
 
There are easily 50 links to POTUS's false statement about the Sun....I am sure you will find them all FAKE. So take a look for yourself. I doubt Fox covered it. Just Google Trump claims Fake News....lol

I searched and the first link is from The Daily Beast, here.

They say:

President Donald Trump claimed in a joint press conference with U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May that his bombshell interview with British newspaper The Sun was “fake news.” Trump criticized May in the Sun interview, saying she did not heed his advice when she opted for a “soft” Brexit.​

They provide a link to the Sun article, here.

The Sun article has an edited subtitled soundtrack spliced in numerous places. The start is not the real start of the interview. First I begin typing Trump’s words as I hear them, without looking at the subs. Since it is not the real start I begin with an ellipsis (…) and a lowercase letter. Here is the script based on what I heard:

…well, if they do a deal like that it will most likely… because we’ll be dealing with the, ah, European Union. Instead of dealing with U.K. So it will probably kill the deal with – if they do that, the - their trade deal with the U.S. is, will probably not be made.​

Here is the script as seen in the SUN subtitles, in blue. Mistakes are underlined or given an @ symbol:

@Well @ if they do a deal like that it would most likely @@ because we’ll be dealing with the European Union @ instead of dealing with UK, @ so it will probably kill the deal with – if they do that their trade deal with the US @ will probably not be made.

I compared with how The Times presented the same quote, here. Here it is, in green, again, with mistakes underlined or with the @ symbol:

@@It will most likely [not happen] because we’ll be dealing with the European Union @ instead of dealing with U.K.. So it will probably kill the deal with . . . if they do that @ the their trade deal with the U.S. @ will probably not be met.

Both the Sun and The Times made mistakes, but the Times put “[not happen]” between ‘likely’ and ‘because’, showing that my original statement about the quote being chopped out of a longer quote was correct. Trump’s meaning was not conveyed by the Sun in this way, adding one more mistake to their transcript. So now I am going to compare the updated version of what I typed (in black), which will include The Times’ ‘[not happen]’, to the Sun’s version (in blue) and draw my final conclusions.

…well, if they do a deal like that it will most likely [not happen] because we’ll be dealing with the, ah, European Union. Instead of dealing with U.K. So it will probably kill the deal with – if they do that, the - their trade deal with the U.S. is, will probably not be made.​

@Well @ if they do a deal like that it would most likely @@ because we’ll be dealing with the European Union @ instead of dealing with UK, @ so it will probably kill the deal with – if they do that their trade deal with the US @ will probably not be made.

The very beginning of the Sun’s quote was Fake for the following reasons:

1) It did not start with an ellipsis or a lowercase letter, but a capital ‘W’, giving the impression it was the beginning of the quote, which is false.
2 & 3) There is no comma after ‘well’, and they wrote ‘would’ instead of ‘will’.
4) They did not include the [not happen] to explain what Trump meant, which is essential when cutting a quote from a larger quote when it will lose context otherwise. Fake News want Trump’s quotes to lose context so this was deliberate.
5) They missed periods after ‘Union’ and ‘U.K.’. Trump’s pauses clearly made them separate sentences, but the Sun joined them together.
6) They left out a comma after ‘that’ and the ‘the’ he said, and a hyphen.
7) They left out the ‘is’ and the comma, after ‘U.S.’

Given that this was only the first three sentences – a mere 54 words – and the Sun made so many errors, there is no point in continuing. It’s a very poor transcript, chockful of flaws, some deliberate; a complete fiasco disguised as “reporting”, and the soundtrack was further edited and spliced, and probably mischievously so. No doubt the work of Trump-hating millennials who don’t give a rat’s ass. There is no reason to trust anything else in it. Trump’s opinion that it is Fake News is perfectly justified.

As usual – no lie.
 
I assumed Strzok would keep his head down and be humble, denying most things and saying a lot of “can’t remembers”. While he did say “can’t remember” a lot, he wasn’t humble at all. In fact he reminded me of an ornery troll. He sat there like a trapped ork, furiously staring at his questioners with real hatred. His contempt and arrogance was mighty obvious. He stained the FBI and is clearly proud about it.

It’s also revealing that Mueller didn’t question him at all about his texts, about why he sent them and how biased they were. It means Mueller is as bad as Strzok, as we assumed all along.

You are just angry because he stood up for himself and the FBI. He made fools of the GOPers on the committee, many of whom were in on the Benghazi situation which last through 8 investigations, took two years and ended with a sigh, not the bang the GOPer's were hoping for.
 
You are just angry because he stood up for himself and the FBI. He made fools of the GOPers on the committee, many of whom were in on the Benghazi situation which last through 8 investigations, took two years and ended with a sigh, not the bang the GOPer's were hoping for.

As I said earlier, Congress needs to stop believing it is competent enough to take these people on in hearings. If they had the kinds of goals a hearing should have, they would have a shot. But their intents are fraudulent and it is entirely because their intents are fraudulent that they fail so badly. Strike 1 was Comey. Strike 2 was Rosentein and Strike 3 was Strozk. Your out Congress...just in time for an indictment to call out one of your own.
 
What empty dissimulative gasbaggery, that.

Imagine if it were Trump up there in front of the cameras, under the exact same circumstances as Strzok. Close your eyes and smile, cause you just know some self righteous Dem would not have refrained from having let fly in the very same fashion.

No? Get your nose outta your butt, then maybe you can wake up, smell the coffee.

It was actually a beautiful thing to witness. I had previously heard Louie similarly describe the smugness of the cheating ex lover liar's testimony from last week. Recognized that perfect oh no hes actually gonna do it tidal wave build up, the Gohmert kill shot as performed in Louie Louie style yesterday... aimed straight between the eyes of that cornered, wounded, smarmy and rabid I cannot answer on advice of my FBI attorneys as its a matter under current investigation chipmunk toothed scoundrel sitting before the committee.

The immediate yowls by those lemmings of the left were worth all the awkward discomfort of doing what any righteous person wishes they had the guts to do to almost any cheat. (Remember, for example, the 360 detail with which the Coop went into with Stormy?)

Yeah, good one Louie.

No you can get your head out of your ass and realize what assholes the repukes have become. Imagine asking 5 deferment cadet bone spurs about looking into his wife's eyes and lying like a piece of **** which has nothing to do with the matter at hand. The repukes including yourself would be outraged and rightly so.

Stay in Panama. Not like you are involved in the USA anymore.
 
Back
Top Bottom