Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011
Results 101 to 105 of 105

Thread: Have you noticed what a hostile brat Strzok was?

  1. #101
    Sage
    Fletch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Mentor Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:27 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    18,956

    Re: Have you noticed what a hostile brat Strzok was?

    Quote Originally Posted by haymarket View Post
    Arguing this point with you is akin to going into an institution and trying to convince Napoleon his is not the rightful Emperor of France. It is simply a waste of time to argue reality with someone who does not reside in it.

    Maanfort is going to be tried soon. Have patience.

    The 12 indictments against the Russian hackers were just announced on Friday. Have patience for the American connection to be announced.

    Of course, in the end, when this is all decided, you will insist that Trump and his campaign had to take these steps to stop the great satan Hillary. All the other lies and excuses and nonsense will be abandoned by the Trumpkins and it will all be Hillary's fault.

    It will be like the old Flip Wilson excuse.....'the Devil made me do it!!!"
    And when you are wrong and none of what you hope happens does, what excuse will you use?

  2. #102
    Sage
    Moot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Utah
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:38 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    29,487

    Re: Have you noticed what a hostile brat Strzok was?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Larrikin View Post
    I saw Strzok being questioned about whether Mueller asked him about his texts, and he said no on each occasion, and then said that Mueller hadn't asked him about any of his texts.
    I guess Mueller didn't need to question him because just the appearance of impropriety was enough to remove him from the investigation.

  3. #103
    Guru

    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:44 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    2,963

    Re: Have you noticed what a hostile brat Strzok was?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fletch View Post
    There is no secret code and there is no plot. These are liberals being liberals. The ideology is the same and the agenda is the same, so their approach to news is the same. No matter what the story, they all have the same take. Thats not conspiracy, its groupthink.
    No, perhaps the problem is that reality has a liberal bias. Trump says something dumb or racist-like, the media reports it, so naturally the media betrays its liberal bias. You don’t have to make up anything to make him look bad, but one is attacked for reporting his words and deeds.

    Face it: We are the most conservative developed country in the world. Yet our populace is surprisingly liberal on a number of issues regarding labor, the environment, etc. Down the middle reporting will appear to the right to be biased. There was similar paranoia in some quarters on the left in the 1960s.

  4. #104
    Thunderstrzok Rob Larrikin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Gold Coast, Australia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    3,002

    Re: Have you noticed what a hostile brat Strzok was?

    Quote Originally Posted by Moot View Post
    I guess Mueller didn't need to question him because just the appearance of impropriety was enough to remove him from the investigation.
    That had me laughing out loud.

    Mueller didn't ask in the same way a mafia boss doesn’t ask. Like so:

    Scene: Vincent Castella in cafeteria, sipping coffee and reading paper. Headline on paper reads “Mafia Boss Castella’s Son Paul Castella Charged With Murder. Fingerprints on gun and knife. Victim’s blood on Castella’s jacket. Out on bail”.

    Vincent: This-a reporter! What a bitch! Non mi rumberi a mingia (Don’t break my balls).
    Paul: Patri! (Father!) [Paul enters café]
    Vincent: My son! [they hug] Sit down, sit down.
    Paul: Have you read the…
    Vincent: Don’t worry son. Everything will be okay. Have some coffee.
    Paul: Dad, I’m sorry about the…
    Vincent: Relax boy, just relax, here, have some cake. We’ll take care of it.
    Paul: Thanks dad, I don’t know what I woul…
    Vincent: Hey, I’m your father. We Castellas look after each other, don’t we?
    Paul: Sure dad, but…
    Vincent: No buts. We’re gonna fix everything. So son, you gotta good lawyer?
    Paul: Well, I …
    Vincent: Okay, you take mine. He’s a good lawyer. Now, who are the witnesses?
    Paul: Well, there’s…

    Let’s leave them there to plot the murders of the witnesses. So why didn’t Vincent ask his son about the fingerprints? Why didn’t he ask him, “Why the hell did you murder someone?”

    Fingerprints. Murder. That’s what happens inside the Mafia. It’s all in a day’s work. It was obviously the least of Vincent’s concerns.

    Similarly, Mueller doesn’t care about the texts Strzok sent, or Strzok’s bias. They were good references for Strzok as far as Mueller was concerned. Why would he ask about them?
    Propagandists make full use of the dumbed down masses, by providing them new doubleplusgood "lies" of Trump's each day, to gaze at like a herd of halfwits.

  5. #105
    Sage
    Moot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Utah
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:38 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    29,487

    Re: Have you noticed what a hostile brat Strzok was?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Larrikin View Post
    That had me laughing out loud.

    Mueller didn't ask in the same way a mafia boss doesn’t ask. Like so:

    Scene: Vincent Castella in cafeteria, sipping coffee and reading paper. Headline on paper reads “Mafia Boss Castella’s Son Paul Castella Charged With Murder. Fingerprints on gun and knife. Victim’s blood on Castella’s jacket. Out on bail”.

    Vincent: This-a reporter! What a bitch! Non mi rumberi a mingia (Don’t break my balls).
    Paul: Patri! (Father!) [Paul enters café]
    Vincent: My son! [they hug] Sit down, sit down.
    Paul: Have you read the…
    Vincent: Don’t worry son. Everything will be okay. Have some coffee.
    Paul: Dad, I’m sorry about the…
    Vincent: Relax boy, just relax, here, have some cake. We’ll take care of it.
    Paul: Thanks dad, I don’t know what I woul…
    Vincent: Hey, I’m your father. We Castellas look after each other, don’t we?
    Paul: Sure dad, but…
    Vincent: No buts. We’re gonna fix everything. So son, you gotta good lawyer?
    Paul: Well, I …
    Vincent: Okay, you take mine. He’s a good lawyer. Now, who are the witnesses?
    Paul: Well, there’s…

    Let’s leave them there to plot the murders of the witnesses. So why didn’t Vincent ask his son about the fingerprints? Why didn’t he ask him, “Why the hell did you murder someone?”

    Fingerprints. Murder. That’s what happens inside the Mafia. It’s all in a day’s work. It was obviously the least of Vincent’s concerns.

    Similarly, Mueller doesn’t care about the texts Strzok sent, or Strzok’s bias. They were good references for Strzok as far as Mueller was concerned. Why would he ask about them?





    Rep. Issa: Hey Chaffetz, you just leaked the highly classified location of the CIA compound in Benghazi on national tv.

    Rep. Chavetz: But Clinton used a private server. .

    Rep. Issa: Okay, we'll pretend you didn't do it...now what did you find on her server?

    Rep. Chavetz: A NYT article that she didn't mark classified.

    Rep. Issa: Well, get it classified and post it on the internet ASAP

    Rep. Chavetz: Okie dokie.

Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •