• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

OMG... Is this creepy or what?

Grim17 said:
You have to see it to believe it.... It's a short video clip of Peter Strzok from Thursday's congressional hearing.

At first I thought it couldn't be real, but apparently it is, and... well...

https://twitter.com/Hollybowie/status/1017551128014225413


.
Click to expand...

Well when 30 or 40 indictments are handed down by Mueller at the end of his investigation will point to your little clip as proof of why all of that came about.

...and the GOP wonders why it is called the party of stupid
 
Grim17 said:
Ummm, at the 34:04 mark. the video begins at the 34:00 mark, so you only have to wait 4 seconds.

.
Click to expand...

No, the 10 hour video. What you linked was a 2 hour snippet uploaded by 'Trump TV Network.'
 
chuckiechan said:
That lawyer was there to protect the FBI's interests by keeping the path of inquiry as narrow as possible.
Click to expand...

The Gowdy Gang was going to ask for details about an ongoing investigation they want to undermine. Oh course the FBI was going to have a lawyer at the hearing.
 
Geoist said:
The Gowdy Gang was going to ask for details about an ongoing investigation they want to undermine. Oh course the FBI was going to have a lawyer at the hearing.
Click to expand...

He was also there in the closed door hearing.
 
Geoist said:
No, the 10 hour video. What you linked was a 2 hour snippet uploaded by 'Trump TV Network.'
Click to expand...

If you doubt it's validity, then by all means find the clip proving it is fake.

I'll wait.
 
Casper said:
Nope, the entire show was a joke, funny how some do not realize how badly this makes them look, desperate people do desperate things.
Click to expand...

Only one person did that wiggly little motion, accompanied by what appears to be uncontrollable facial movements.

The only person who looked bad in that clip was the wiggly one.
 
late said:
Your inability to recognise that he was under extreme stress is fascinating.

For a millisecond.
Click to expand...

I'm sure he WAS under stress, but if that's his signature move, I bet he has a hard time getting girlfriends.

Good looking ones, anyway.
 
cabse5 said:
Well, you know, he's biased and his treating of the Hillary email case was miles more lenient than his treating of the Trump Russian collusion case. And he was one of the lead investigators on both cases. You do the math.
Click to expand...

Which has more Priority? A Cab member mishandling emails or an attack by a foreign adversary committing espionage?

If, as an FBI director you prioritize the emails before the Espionage you would be derelict.

Also noting that Strzok had many people above him to approve or disapprove his priorities, noting that he was directed to do so.

The IG found no bias nor has the hearing succeeded at any level other than feeding redmeat to a frenzy of hungry Trump supporters. It is a blatantly obvious ruse to try and undermin the Mueller investigation because these spineless Republicans cannot fathom the idea that their president is subject of a criminal investigation.

Right out of the gate they tried to threaten Strzock with contempt 4 not answering questions on a point of order which revealed he could not possibly answer. But Dowdy and Republicans had no problem when they questioned Bannon and those of the administration when they couldn't answer questions and they did absolutely nothing but put their tail between their legs. The hypocrisy of these Republicans is mind-boggling.

And they had no problem when Hillary was the subject of an investigation where they investigated her eight times over a period of two and a half years and found nothing. Dowdy and those of his ilk are not concerned with protecting our country but are more concerned with attacking those who are protecting our country.
 
Last edited:
HowardBThiname said:
Only one person did that wiggly little motion, accompanied by what appears to be uncontrollable facial movements.

The only person who looked bad in that clip was the wiggly one.
Click to expand...

Maybe you should view the entire show and ask yourself why that circus was even held. I found a elected official talking about the man's personal life far more embarrassing for the Nation, especially when one realizes who the one doing the questioning supports in the Whitehouse. People that know what I'd going on understand that this is nothing more than another distraction and lame attempt to stop the Mueller investigation, guess what Not Gonna Happen.
 
Casper said:
Maybe you should view the entire show and ask yourself why that circus was even held. I found a elected official talking about the man's personal life far more embarrassing for the Nation, especially when one realizes who the one doing the questioning supports in the Whitehouse. People that know what I'd going on understand that this is nothing more than another distraction and lame attempt to stop the Mueller investigation, guess what Not Gonna Happen.
Click to expand...

This isn't about "the circus." This is about a guy who wiggles and purses his lips in a very creepy manner.
 
HowardBThiname said:
This isn't about "the circus." This is about a guy who wiggles and purses his lips in a very creepy manner.
Click to expand...

You are missing the point of the show. But hey enjoy what you are watching, it would be funny if it did not point out that our government is becoming more dysfunctional by the day. Not something to laugh about, but then again I still care....
 
Geoist said:
No, the 10 hour video. What you linked was a 2 hour snippet uploaded by 'Trump TV Network.'
Click to expand...

The video of Strzok is legitimate and I think you already know that.

Since the clip I presented doesn't meet with your approval, maybe this video from NBC News will... Or are you going to claim that NBC News also manipulated their video to make Strzok look like a fricken weird-o?

.
 
veritas1 said:
Strzok is a smarmy little twerp and is lying out his ass. His bias has been definitively established. He was kicked down to HR in the FBI because of it. He was kicked off the Mueller investigation because of it.
Click to expand...

I watched most of it but for the life of me, did not get what I was looking for. Hey, maybe you know! Tell me veritas (is that you James O'Keefe!?), what did he do to enhance the investigation and thwart Trump? Remember -- I am asking for actions.
 
Middleground said:
I watched most of it but for the life of me, did not get what I was looking for. Hey, maybe you know! Tell me veritas (is that you James O'Keefe!?), what did he do to enhance the investigation and thwart Trump? Remember -- I am asking for actions.
Click to expand...

He didn't have to do anything. His clear bias was enough to get him demoted at the FBI and removed from Mueller's team. The OIG report shows that he dragged his feet on the Weiner email issue in order to jumpstart the Trump Russia investigation. So, when Democrats were complaining about Comey coming out in October regarding the second email matter, they had Strzok to thank.
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
No iit's bashing a patriotic FBI Agent who has been found to do no wrongdoing, was dragged into a congressional hearing for no reason, and destroyed the GOP CT about the deep state. Your last line of attack is to attack his looks and that one debateable motion that he made with his face in ten hours??? When the guy you support constantly makes weird motions with his hands and doesn't even know how to spell.
Click to expand...

Real or not, this video clip isn't about looks. It is about demeanor, smugness. It is not about his looks. If we are really defending a dishonorable FBI agent who has been relieved of his post, why do we have no qualms about the most despicable attacks against a sitting president? Please don't preach decorum.
 
veritas1 said:
He didn't have to do anything. His clear bias was enough to get him demoted at the FBI and removed from Mueller's team.
Click to expand...

He did have to do something. We all have bias -- it's whether we act on that bias is what matters.

The OIG report shows that he dragged his feet on the Weiner email issue in order to jumpstart the Trump Russia investigation.
Click to expand...

AS far as I have read, the above statement is not true. It's been noted that he was extremely vigilant in the Clinton investigation.

So, when Democrats were complaining about Comey coming out in October regarding the second email matter, they had Strzok to thank.
Click to expand...

Did Strzok make Comey do what he did?

PS. You have still failed to show me actions that Strzok took against Trump in his investigations.
 
Lovebug said:
Real or not, this video clip isn't about looks. It is about demeanor, smugness. It is not about his looks. If we are really defending a dishonorable FBI agent who has been relieved of his post, why do we have no qualms about the most despicable attacks against a sitting president? Please don't preach decorum.
Click to expand...

The difference is Mr. Swampy for the most part chooses to look and act like a douchebag. The right wing media are so desperate to attack strzok's "smugness" as you now say you never considered the possibility that the reason he is so smug is because he knows he did nothing wrong and is enjoying trolling the Republicans.

If you were accused of murder and the other side's case was so bad that it made no sense. Wouldn't you have a little fun with them too?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Casper said:
You are missing the point of the show. But hey enjoy what you are watching, it would be funny if it did not point out that our government is becoming more dysfunctional by the day. Not something to laugh about, but then again I still care....
Click to expand...

I'm not "watching" it. That kind of stuff bores me silly.

I'm just commenting on the creepy little quiver Peter did that lasted no more than a few seconds. It was short -- but disturbing all the same.
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
The difference is Mr. Swampy for the most part chooses to look and act like a douchebag. The right wing media are so desperate to attack strzok's "smugness" as you now say you never considered the possibility that the reason he is so smug is because he knows he did nothing wrong and is enjoying trolling the Republicans.

If you were accused of murder and the other side's case was so bad that it made no sense. Wouldn't you have a little fun with them too?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

It depends on how far up the partisan ladder one is.
We have read that the video is edited, we have read that they are attacking his "looks", we read Trumps whataboutism, but none of that changes the fact that the man wrote what he did, and that is he very biased, smug, dishonest. We are discussing him, his interview, his video.
Instead of making faces, he could admit that what he wrote was unbecoming, apologize and move on.
 
Lovebug said:
It depends on how far up the partisan ladder one is.
We have read that the video is edited, we have read that they are attacking his "looks", we read Trumps whataboutism, but none of that changes the fact that the man wrote what he did, and that is he very biased, smug, dishonest. We are discussing him, his interview, his video.
Instead of making faces, he could admit that what he wrote was unbecoming, apologize and move on.
Click to expand...

Why should he have to apologize for not liking the president when its been proven that even if his bias played a role in his investigation, which it did not, there were checks and balances around each corner in order to ensure that everything was done in a professional manner?

Btw one weird face in ten hours is not "making faces". He also likely didn't even know he was making it.

I'm sure conservative FBI Agents told their gfs that Trump would win and Hillary will get thrown in jail. Should they apologize too?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Why should he have to apologize for not liking the president when its been proven that even if his bias played a role in his investigation, which it did not, there were checks and balances around each corner in order to ensure that everything was done in a professional manner?

Btw one weird face in ten hours is not "making faces". He also likely didn't even know he was making it.

I'm sure conservative FBI Agents told their gfs that Trump would win and Hillary will get thrown in jail. Should they apologize too?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

If a conservative agent is caught saying that he will do his best to prevent Hillary from winning, you have my blessing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom