• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kav goes Hack on his FIrst Public Statement

calamity

Privileged
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
160,900
Reaction score
57,844
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
Wow, ok, I didn't expect him to open up by parroting a Trump-worthy line.



"No president ever..."

Publicly kissing ass. Just wonderful.



There have been 162 nominations to the Supreme Court, according to U.S. Senate records, over the past 229 years. (The Supreme Court began in 1789.) For Kavanaugh to make such a claim, he would have to have studied not just those confirmations, but the often-secretive selection processes that preceded them. These things, quite simply, are not a matter of public record or even all that well documented by reporters. A week ago, for example, most media outlets were reporting the list of three finalists did not include Thomas Hardiman. By the end, it was believed Kavanaugh's top competitor was Hardiman.
.
.
.
eyond that, there are reasons to doubt it. Trump actually leaned quite heavily on a list of names he did not put together himself but were instead provided by the conservative Federalist Society — a group whose ideological diversity is not exactly vast. Trump did not stray from that list for either this selection or Neil M. Gorsuch's. And Trump spent a relatively brief two-week period making this decision. Barack Obama, by contrast, spent about a month reviewing his options before he nominated Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. The claim does fit a pattern with Trump, though, in which those around him feel pressure — whether overt or not — to flatter him in the most glowing and hyperbolic terms possible. The most ridiculous example was the letter Trump's then-personal doctor, Harold Bornstein, wrote during the 2016 campaign, which contended, “If elected, Mr. Trump, I can state unequivocally, will be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency.” Bornstein now says the note was essentially dictated by Trump or even coerced.

:thinking
 
Wow, ok, I didn't expect him to open up by parroting a Trump-worthy line.



"No president ever..."

Publicly kissing ass. Just wonderful.





:thinking

Oh, it might even be a little worse than that. There's a change that Kennedy and Trump were in negotiations for months to get Kav on the court, and that entails a LOT of very troublesome things.

https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1016713769551089666

"BREAKING: Looks like my hunch was right. The fix *was* in, as NBC now confirms. This was a backroom deal that Trump deliberately hid from the American people by pretending he was vetting candidates. He *wasn't* vetting candidates; he *got* this vacancy by making a secret promise."
 
Oh, it might even be a little worse than that. There's a change that Kennedy and Trump were in negotiations for months to get Kav on the court, and that entails a LOT of very troublesome things.

https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1016713769551089666

"BREAKING: Looks like my hunch was right. The fix *was* in, as NBC now confirms. This was a backroom deal that Trump deliberately hid from the American people by pretending he was vetting candidates. He *wasn't* vetting candidates; he *got* this vacancy by making a secret promise."

***in' A. Kleptocracy and a half, if true...


No doubt the angle used to ignore it will be "Source familiar tells" or maybe they'll also use "NBC." Of course, even if Trump personally signed a DVD containing footage of this happening I doubt it'll matter.
 
***in' A. Kleptocracy and a half, if true...


No doubt the angle used to ignore it will be "Source familiar tells" or maybe they'll also use "NBC." Of course, even if Trump personally signed a DVD containing footage of this happening I doubt it'll matter.

Given the track record so far? Probably won't. And I'm not saying I buy this yet, but if it's even half-true, it's likely going to have legs.
 
Can't answer the question ?? Won't answer the question ?? Or WaPo didn't say that and you made it up ??

I'll wait
I have an answer: the new judge is slurp-boi
 
Wow, this huge! Anyone tell Mueller yet?
 
On my mind right now: Trump could win the 50 yard dash in front of 80,000 people and the result would be many dim wits claiming that it was all an optical illusion, that we got conned.
 
Oh, it might even be a little worse than that. There's a change that Kennedy and Trump were in negotiations for months to get Kav on the court, and that entails a LOT of very troublesome things.

https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1016713769551089666

"BREAKING: Looks like my hunch was right. The fix *was* in, as NBC now confirms. This was a backroom deal that Trump deliberately hid from the American people by pretending he was vetting candidates. He *wasn't* vetting candidates; he *got* this vacancy by making a secret promise."

Since that story has already been shot down, lot's of words come to mind here... Like "Fake News", "irresponsible", "gullible", "unhinged", etc...


.
 
if the OP is true Kav better get a stomach pump & remove all the splooge he ingested ...........
 
Oh, it might even be a little worse than that. There's a change that Kennedy and Trump were in negotiations for months to get Kav on the court, and that entails a LOT of very troublesome things.

https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1016713769551089666

"BREAKING: Looks like my hunch was right. The fix *was* in, as NBC now confirms. This was a backroom deal that Trump deliberately hid from the American people by pretending he was vetting candidates. He *wasn't* vetting candidates; he *got* this vacancy by making a secret promise."

You should be careful about quoting anything from the mainstream echo chamber...at least not until you wait and see if they are going to retract their bull****.

I’ve deleted this tweet because it incorrectly implies a transactional nature in Kennedy’s replacement. I am told by a source who was not directly part of the talks that Kennedy provided Pres. Trump/ WH a list of acceptable replacements. (1/2) pic.twitter.com/ptxJmrbH9S

— Leigh Ann Caldwell (@LACaldwellDC) July 10, 2018

Kavanaugh was the only one who was thought conservative enough to consider, I’m told. They added Kavanaugh – and 4 other names - to the public Federalist list that Trump would choose from in November. We are continuing to report this story. (2/2)

— Leigh Ann Caldwell (@LACaldwellDC) July 10, 2018
 
Since that story has already been shot down, lot's of words come to mind here... Like "Fake News", "irresponsible", "gullible", "unhinged", etc...


.

Since it was never confirmed and reported as such in the first place, it wasn't actually fake news, nor was it irresponsible.

It's not clear you understand what the terms actually mean.
 
Since it was never confirmed and reported as such in the first place, it wasn't actually fake news, nor was it irresponsible.

It's not clear you understand what the terms actually mean.

It should have never been tweeted out by a reporter for NBC News.

fakenews1.jpg


Looks like my hunch was right. The fix *was* in, as NBC now confirms. This was a backroom deal that Trump deliberately hid from the American people by pretending he was vetting candidates. He *wasn't* vetting candidates; he *got* this vacancy by making a secret promise.

Fake News fits perfectly....

.
 
Since it was never confirmed and reported as such in the first place, it wasn't actually fake news, nor was it irresponsible.

It's not clear you understand what the terms actually mean.

Fox: Real News

Everything else: Fake
 
It should have never been tweeted out by a reporter for NBC News.

View attachment 67236011


Looks like my hunch was right. The fix *was* in, as NBC now confirms. This was a backroom deal that Trump deliberately hid from the American people by pretending he was vetting candidates. He *wasn't* vetting candidates; he *got* this vacancy by making a secret promise.

Fake News fits perfectly....

.

LOL! But it wasn't actually released as a news story. You seem to be having trouble with the term.

Perhaps you should express your dissatisfaction to the reporter herself?
 
LOL! But it wasn't actually released as a news story. You seem to be having trouble with the term.

Perhaps you should express your dissatisfaction to the reporter herself?

When a reporter for NBC News tweets it out before confirming it, it's the same damned thing.... Abramson posted it as "Confirmed by NBC" and you posted it on this forum as fact.

Fake news is fake news.

.
 
When a reporter for NBC News tweets it out before confirming it, it's the same damned thing.... Abramson posted it as "Confirmed by NBC" and you posted it on this forum as fact.

Fake news is fake news.

.

He posted it as "fact"? Is that why he said this in post 10?

Given the track record so far? Probably won't. And I'm not saying I buy this yet, but if it's even half-true, it's likely going to have legs.




He said in his OP "Jesus, he's one of those. I hope Trump handed him a napkin first.", which is a perfectly valid thing to say regardless of this tweet/reporter. First time I remember a SCOTUS nominee's sucking up like this in the first public statement
 
He posted it as "fact"? Is that why he said this in post 10?

I was talking about post #8...you know, the one I quoted that started this current conversation.

Here it is:

Oh, it might even be a little worse than that. There's a change that Kennedy and Trump were in negotiations for months to get Kav on the court, and that entails a LOT of very troublesome things.

https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/sta...13769551089666

"BREAKING: Looks like my hunch was right. The fix *was* in, as NBC now confirms. This was a backroom deal that Trump deliberately hid from the American people by pretending he was vetting candidates. He *wasn't* vetting candidates; he *got* this vacancy by making a secret promise."

So as I said... He posted it here as fact.
 
Back
Top Bottom