- Joined
- Jan 21, 2013
- Messages
- 25,357
- Reaction score
- 11,557
- Location
- Post-Trump America
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
I made an interesting comparison today.
1. Gun Control advocates usually support very lackluster (if any) gun control laws. They say the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. They say gun laws won't help because a bad guy with a gun is already thinking about and breaking the law.
2. Conservatives are usually very much against illegal immigration. Usually saying that illegals are taking our jobs away and that we need a wall to stop them, and that we need to kick them out. Why aren't people saying, immigration laws won't help because a bad guy wanting to come into this country illegally is already thinking about and breaking the law.
How can you be for one form of government but against another? This is an interesting comparison that I don't hear too often.The difference between the stances of no gun laws, vs very strict immigration policies.
1. Gun Control advocates usually support very lackluster (if any) gun control laws. They say the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. They say gun laws won't help because a bad guy with a gun is already thinking about and breaking the law.
2. Conservatives are usually very much against illegal immigration. Usually saying that illegals are taking our jobs away and that we need a wall to stop them, and that we need to kick them out. Why aren't people saying, immigration laws won't help because a bad guy wanting to come into this country illegally is already thinking about and breaking the law.
How can you be for one form of government but against another? This is an interesting comparison that I don't hear too often.The difference between the stances of no gun laws, vs very strict immigration policies.
Last edited: