• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

America the Ugly

JackA

JackA

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
6,917
Reaction score
2,930
Location
Richmond, VA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...away-from-his-parents/?utm_term=.b89b515edfc8


Deterrence is the stated justification for our national policy of taking children from their parents, even permanently since we have no mechanism for reuniting them once the parents are deported. The policy applies to babies during moments of being breast fed by their mothers. A majority of the party-of-family-values is all in on this policy. But isn't it unnecessarily messy having all these detention centers filled with wailing babies, toddlers, small children and sullen and angry teenagers?

Why not kill them?

Stronger deterrent, arguably less cruel.
 
JackA said:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...away-from-his-parents/?utm_term=.b89b515edfc8


Deterrence is the stated justification for our national policy of taking children from their parents, even permanently since we have no mechanism for reuniting them once the parents are deported. The policy applies to babies during moments of being breast fed by their mothers. A majority of the party-of-family-values is all in on this policy. But isn't it unnecessarily messy having all these detention centers filled with wailing babies, toddlers, small children and sullen and angry teenagers?

Why not kill them?

Stronger deterrent, arguably less cruel.
Click to expand...

Like abortion?
 
JackA said:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...away-from-his-parents/?utm_term=.b89b515edfc8


Deterrence is the stated justification for our national policy of taking children from their parents, even permanently since we have no mechanism for reuniting them once the parents are deported. The policy applies to babies during moments of being breast fed by their mothers. A majority of the party-of-family-values is all in on this policy. But isn't it unnecessarily messy having all these detention centers filled with wailing babies, toddlers, small children and sullen and angry teenagers?

Why not kill them?

Stronger deterrent, arguably less cruel.
Click to expand...

Great.. outright lying is the policy for leftist now.. how original.
 
Oborosen said:
Great.. outright lying is the policy for leftist now.. how original.
Click to expand...

Keep in mind, the male teenagers we are kidnapping likely are being radicalized by the experience; at least some of them, and one day will want revenge. Best to get rid of them now, don't you think?
 
Oborosen said:
Great, I can just see planned parenthoods stock prices rising by another 1/4th in the coming year.
Click to expand...

Planned Parenthood buys stock with taxpayer funds?
 
JackA said:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...away-from-his-parents/?utm_term=.b89b515edfc8


Deterrence is the stated justification for our national policy of taking children from their parents, even permanently since we have no mechanism for reuniting them once the parents are deported. The policy applies to babies during moments of being breast fed by their mothers. A majority of the party-of-family-values is all in on this policy. But isn't it unnecessarily messy having all these detention centers filled with wailing babies, toddlers, small children and sullen and angry teenagers?

Why not kill them?

Stronger deterrent, arguably less cruel.
Click to expand...

Definition of the 'root cause' of the problem - 3 countries in Central America are absolute ****holes.

“This is truly a refugee crisis,” Young said. “People become refugees when they’re desperate to escape violence. The violence is throughout Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala, and the governments are too weak or too corrupt to control it. So people make the only choice they feel they have available, and they run.

“You’re not going to be able to stop that,” she added, “until conditions in the home country improve.”
Click to expand...

Proposed solutions appear to be A) send billions more in US financial aid to (all three?) weak and/or corrupt governments (with the hope for change) and B) until things get better, grant US asylum to their entire populations should they flee here and ask for it.
 
JackA said:
Keep in mind, the male teenagers we are kidnapping likely are being radicalized by the experience; at least some of them, and one day will want revenge. Best to get rid of them now, don't you think?
Click to expand...

Go figure, a liberal who is completely fine with the unnecessary murder of children.

Not in the least surprising to me at this point.
 
We don't need to kill anyone. Eliminating taxation solves the issue.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Definition of the 'root cause' of the problem - 3 countries in Central America are absolute ****holes.



Proposed solutions appear to be A) send billions more in US financial aid to (all three?) weak and/or corrupt governments (with the hope for change) and B) until things get better, grant US asylum to their entire populations should they flee here and ask for it.
Click to expand...

The problem has its roots in US relations with the region, dating back almost a hundred years, involving policies like FDR's support of the first Somoza ("he's a son of a bitch, but he's OUR son of a bitch"), US influence in creating Panama, overthrow of democracy in Guatemala in 1954, and Reagan's brutal policies, which led to the eventual evolution of drug gangs from the military, death squads and revolutionaries. We (and United Fruit Co. and other businesses) helped create the ****hole problem, and we are getting some payback. The solutions won't be easy, but it might start by the president not using words like ****holes.
 
vegas giants said:
How can they sell stock?
Click to expand...

From what I've seen. Its traded into PP on a personal portfolio and used to get benefits for certain groups, interacting between themselves and PP. Its one of those practices that has gotten questionable accusations at best.

I am currently looking for the original files, but its been a while.
I'll keep a table open here in case I run across it.
 
Oborosen said:
From what I've seen. Its traded into PP on a personal portfolio and used to get benefits for certain groups, interacting between themselves and PP. Its one of those practices that has gotten questionable accusations at best.

I am currently looking for the original files, but its been a while.
I'll keep a table open here in case I run across it.
Click to expand...

You mean they buy stock? Ok fine what is wrong with that? But they can not issue stock
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Definition of the 'root cause' of the problem - 3 countries in Central America are absolute ****holes.



Proposed solutions appear to be A) send billions more in US financial aid to (all three?) weak and/or corrupt governments (with the hope for change) and B) until things get better, grant US asylum to their entire populations should they flee here and ask for it.
Click to expand...

what if A and B are untenable in my eyes?

what if i would rather spend those billions housing the homeless here, and feeding the poor here

we cant fix every problem in the world....it isnt possible, and there isnt enough money

dont you owe it to Americans to make this place right first?

or is this all going on the credit cards for the grand kids to pay also?

how much debt do you want to pile on them?
 
From what I've seen, the stock is loaded into them like a piggy bank. However it can only be touched by specific hands.
 
vegas giants said:
Ok.....so?
Click to expand...

Its complicated.. and now I am going to be worried until I see what else this is about. Because even after reading three sources on this process, it seems pretty strange.

It seems they are selling what is called "factorals" for the stock that is flushed into their holdings. Yet I cannot see who is eligible for handling this money in the long run. One source called them services and the other called them benefits.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom