• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump told 4 lies about the inspector general report in one short Fox News hit

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,171
Reaction score
82,449
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Trump told 4 lies about the inspector general report in one short Fox News hit

images


6/15/18

Lie 1: the FBI was working against him during the campaign
“They were plotting against my election,” Trump said, in perhaps the biggest of the four lies. This is not true. Inspector General Michael Horowitz was quite clear on this point in the report, which reviewed the FBI’s handling of both the Clinton email investigation and the early stages of the Trump-Russia probe. “We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative decisions we reviewed,” Horowitz concluded. Trump did eventually confront this uncomfortable fact during the interview. He claimed the no bias conclusion was irresponsible, a throwaway line at the end of the report.

Lie 2: the IG “blew it” by concluding the FBI wasn’t biased
“It was a pretty good report, and then I say the IG blew it at the end,” Trump told Fox’s Steve Doocy. The IG report was a horror show. I thought that one sentence of conclusion was ridiculous.” The conclusion said that the FBI wasn’t biased was not a throwaway conclusion at the end of the report, but a conclusion that’s examined in-depth and repeated with some frequency throughout the report (see: Chapters 5 and 12). The conclusion that there was no bias, in short, wasn’t “one line” — it was a conclusion they arrived at after examining a tremendous amount of evidence, and a major focus of the report.

Lie 3: Trump says the IG report says he did nothing wrong
The third Trump lie is that the IG report somehow exonerated him on the question of collusion with Russia during the campaign. “I did nothing wrong, there was no collusion, there was no obstruction. The IG report yesterday went a long way to show that,” Trump said. “I think that the Mueller investigation has been totally discredited.” This is actually a number of different lies packed into three short sentences; a Russian nesting doll of lies, if you’ll pardon the metaphor. The IG report did not come to any conclusions about the true nature of Trump-Russia ties. It only covered the appropriateness of the FBI’s conduct in 2016. It couldn’t come to any conclusions about obstruction of justice because Trump didn’t become president until 2017. Likewise, it couldn’t discredit the Mueller investigation because Mueller didn’t take over the investigation until President Trump fired FBI Director James Comey last May.

Lie 4: James Comey is a criminal
And that brings us to our final lie. Fox’s Doocy asked Trump a 'leading question' — “Should James Comey be locked up?” — and the president responded as expected: "Certainly, they just seem like very criminal acts to me. What he did was criminal. What he did was so bad in terms of our Constitution, in terms of the well-being of our country." Once again, Horowitz’s report closely examined questions raised by Comey’s conduct. He was harshly critical of the former FBI director — “In key moments, then Director Comey chose to deviate from the FBI’s and the Department’s established procedures and norms and instead engaged in his own subjective, ad hoc decisionmaking” — but there’s no evidence in the report that Comey violated any kind of criminal statute, let alone acted unconstitutionally. In fact, the report concludes, Comey’s decisions during the Clinton email investigation, while questionable, came from his professional judgment and were not the result of any malign intent. “Comey’s decision was the result of his consideration of the evidence that the FBI had collected during the course of the investigation and his understanding of the proof required to pursue a prosecution under the relevant statutes,” as Horowitz puts it when discussing his closing of the Clinton email case. Trump’s characterization of the IG report is thus basically wrong in every way.

Trumps "alternative truths" (lies) on full display.
 
he lies about nearly everything.
 
This is one of those situations where being right isn't useful.

It's a lot easier to defend lying about some technicality or other, rather than defending his policies, so he feeds us a steady diet of things to get upset over, and thus controls the conversation.

By pointing and shrieking "He's LYING!!!" at every opportunity, we play into his hand. It's counter productive. The legitimate complaints get mixed in with the nonsense, so it all seems like nonsense.

We discredit ourselves similarly to the boy who cried wolf, but in reverse. The people who can make a difference (largely the GOP-led Congress) don't care how often he lies.

So rather than continuing to cry wolf, we're best served working to change Congress, either by changing their minds, or changing the occupants.
 
That is about the most idiotic spin yet.

And much of it based solely on semantics. The branch of semantics to which I refer, for the under or non informed lefties out there, means words that can be manipulated to influence human thought and action.

The use of political bias, for instance. What about just proving bias...which is abundantly proven throughout the report. Along with actions taken that is traitorous.

The report IS damning, it cannot be truthfully said to be otherwise.

There is no evidence anywhere known of ANY Trump collusion. The OIG report was damning in aspects, ie, that Comedy was ripe for justifiable termination and that with such questionable provenance as to what created any credible belief in such collusion (not a crime remember), that the muels probe has far outlasted an ostensible mandate it never had in the first place.

Comedy committed crimes anywhere from the illegal leaking of classified materials, illegal and unauthorized removal of official FBI documents, lying under oath, etc...all the way up to administering unequal justice contra the 14th amendment...not my favorite but certainly applicable in this case.

Y'all are just comical, cant see your own noses...probably buried too deep where the sun seldom peeks.
 
Trump is a disease and it is eating away at the body politic like nothing we have ever seen from a president in our history. He must be removed at once before he does even more damage.
 
Mueller isn't charged with proving "collusion", you know it … so does djt. You and djt are stuck on a spin cycle … that won't wash.

President Stable Genius continues again and again to say that there was no collusion, that he didn't commit collusion. The Trump cult now psychologically programmed through propaganda to repeat and believe what Trump says hasn't bothered and will not bother to check for truth whenever Trump speaks. Trump said he is not guilty of collusion. Mueller was not directed to investigate for "collusion". Trump cult members can easily find the truth for themselves. They will not.
 
Your post … yep!



Mueller isn't charged with proving "collusion", you know it … so does djt. You and djt are stuck on a spin cycle … that won't wash.

Wow, so not so clever...but hey, gave it your best shot, no doubt.

The muel, under DOJ guidelines, as a special counsel is only installed to investigate a crime. Now for a thousand, Mr Trebek, What is that Crime?
 
This is one of those situations where being right isn't useful.

It's a lot easier to defend lying about some technicality or other, rather than defending his policies, so he feeds us a steady diet of things to get upset over, and thus controls the conversation.

By pointing and shrieking "He's LYING!!!" at every opportunity, we play into his hand. It's counter productive. The legitimate complaints get mixed in with the nonsense, so it all seems like nonsense.

We discredit ourselves similarly to the boy who cried wolf, but in reverse. The people who can make a difference (largely the GOP-led Congress) don't care how often he lies.

So rather than continuing to cry wolf, we're best served working to change Congress, either by changing their minds, or changing the occupants.

I disagree. It's important to publish the truth because Trump certainly doesn't deal in truth. He spews lies each and every day.

And OPs like this kill some of the talking/lying points of Trumps trained flying monkey's ... better known as Trumpers.
 
Wow, so not so clever...but hey, gave it your best shot, no doubt.

Well, not collusion, collusion isn't a crime. You know it and so does djt.

The muel, under DOJ guidelines, as a special counsel is only installed to investigate a crime. Now for a thousand, Mr Trebek, What is that Crime?[/QUOTE]

I'll take tRump covered in **** for a Thousand.

According to a recent poll, most Americans don’t think special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation has uncovered any crimes.
But the truth is that Mueller’s team has either indicted or gotten guilty pleas from 20 people and three companies — that we know of.


1) George Papadopoulos, former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, pleaded guilty in October to making false statements to the FBI.

2) Michael Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser, pleaded guilty in December to making false statements to the FBI.

3) Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chair, was indicted in October in Washington, DC on charges of conspiracy, money laundering, and false statements — all related to his work for Ukrainian politicians before he joined the Trump campaign. He’s pleaded not guilty on all counts. Then, in February, Mueller filed a new case against him in Virginia, with tax, financial, and bank fraud charges.

4) Rick Gates, a former Trump campaign aide and Manafort’s longtime junior business partner, was indicted on similar charges to Manafort. But in February he agreed to a plea deal with Mueller’s team, pleading guilty to just one false statements charge and one conspiracy charge.

5-20) 13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies were indicted on conspiracy charges, with some also being accused of identity theft. The charges related to a Russian propaganda effort designed to interfere with the 2016 campaign. The companies involved are the Internet Research Agency, often described as a “Russian troll farm,” and two other companies that helped finance it. The Russian nationals indicted include 12 of the agency’s employees and its alleged financier, Yevgeny Prigozhin.

21) Richard Pinedo: This California man pleaded guilty to an identity theft charge in connection with the Russian indictments, and has agreed to cooperate with Mueller.

22) Alex van der Zwaan: This London lawyer pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI about his contacts with Rick Gates and another unnamed person based in Ukraine
.
23) Konstantin Kilimnik: This longtime business associate of Manafort and Gates, who’s currently based in Russia, was charged alongside Manafort with attempting to obstruct justice by tampering with witnesses in Manafort’s pending case this year.
Two ex-Trump advisers lied to the FBI about their contacts with Russians

-Vox

Read all about: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/2/20/17031772/mueller-indictments-grand-jury
 
Trump told another whopper during that Fox & Friends interview. He said he's bringing back all of our war dead from the Korean War.

Trump lied and said many parents of Korean War missing servicemen asked him to do this during the campaign. Do the math. Those parents would have to be at least 105 years old in 2016.

This is an outright lie and a supreme disservice to the families of the missing. There are ~7,500 US military personal not accounted for from the Korean War. ~5,300 are in North Korea.

Anyone that believes this Trump fabrication needs to take a really long look in the mirror and ask themselves ... what sort of fool am I?

It’s not very likely that parents of Korean War MIAs asked Trump to repatriate their children’s remains

Trump-Kim Deal Promises Answers for Families of Korean War M.I.A.s
 
Oh Trump lied today? What's that water is apparently wet? Hmm That is interesting.
 
I disagree. It's important to publish the truth because Trump certainly doesn't deal in truth. He spews lies each and every day.

And OPs like this kill some of the talking/lying points of Trumps trained flying monkey's ... better known as Trumpers.

Well now, let's not paint all of Trump's flying monkeys with one broad brush.

I'll have you know that, like snowflakes, no two Trump worshippers are alike.

Sure, you got your Trumpers. But let's not forget your Trumptards, Trumpkins, Trumpians, Trumpleton's, Trumpster's and Trumpholes.

They really do come in all shapes and sizes.
 
Well, not collusion, collusion isn't a crime. You know it and so does djt.

The muel, under DOJ guidelines, as a special counsel is only installed to investigate a crime. Now for a thousand, Mr Trebek, What is that Crime?

I'll take tRump covered in **** for a Thousand.



Read all about: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/2/20/17031772/mueller-indictments-grand-jury[/QUOTE]

Thats not what was asked...

Know why you cant answer? Same reason you ve got crimes, most minor, all across the board, this is an investigation in search of a crime/s... know what that is known as, by chance? Hint 1: had one back in Salem, Mass in the late 1600s...

Hint 2: its exactly what a certain already super accomplished president called it from the very beginning.

Hint 3: It would be so much more appropriate, the phrase would actually work perfectly, if they were investigating that chubby vrroom vrrrooom broom rider from Chappaqua.
 
I disagree. It's important to publish the truth because Trump certainly doesn't deal in truth. He spews lies each and every day.

And OPs like this kill some of the talking/lying points of Trumps trained flying monkey's ... better known as Trumpers.

I'm not opposed to publishing the truth, but I think every second we spend hollering and stomping our feet about Trump being a liar is a second wasted, in term of replacing him in 2020. It simply doesn't resonate with the people it would need to. It also feeds the imagine that being anti-Trump is the same as being anti-U.S., and that plays with some voters that we need to win over.

With Obama, we could fall back on the idea that he was the only adult in a room full of shrieking children. Now he's gone, and we've become the shrieking children. It doesn't matter if we're shrieking for a "better" reason, it's still bad optics. Worse, since now the economy has swung back, so we appear to be complaining in times of plenty.

We need to sell the idea that Trump isn't responsible for the economic boom. It's not easier when we are tearing out our hair every time Trump says something oafish.

I find it quite troubling that mid-2018 the Dems haven't already lined up behind a contender for 2020. Trump never stopped campaigning. Dems need to start, and soon. I believe it's shaping up to be a tougher fight than many would imagine, though with Trump anything's possible.
 
Thats not what was asked...

Bull...oney! The implication is Mueller's investigation has produced nothing of value, not true, and is a never ending search for "any kind of djt wrong doing" which the indictments and guilty pleas prove, also, not true.

And, NO, it's not a witch hunt. The truth is with so many different charges and accusations, not just from Mueller but from across the board and across the country, it's more of a WHICH hunt.

Oh, and btw, HRC lost and is a retired grandmother … get over it.
 
This is one of those situations where being right isn't useful.

It's a lot easier to defend lying about some technicality or other, rather than defending his policies, so he feeds us a steady diet of things to get upset over, and thus controls the conversation.

By pointing and shrieking "He's LYING!!!" at every opportunity, we play into his hand. It's counter productive. The legitimate complaints get mixed in with the nonsense, so it all seems like nonsense.

We discredit ourselves similarly to the boy who cried wolf, but in reverse. The people who can make a difference (largely the GOP-led Congress) don't care how often he lies.

So rather than continuing to cry wolf, we're best served working to change Congress, either by changing their minds, or changing the occupants.

Not calling out lies makes them normalized. We can't let lies become that...EVER. When the President knowingly lies to the American people it is a violation of his oath of office.
 
Bull...oney! The implication is Mueller's investigation has produced nothing of value, not true, and is a never ending search for "any kind of djt wrong doing" which the indictments and guilty pleas prove, also, not true.

And, NO, it's not a witch hunt. The truth is with so many different charges and accusations, not just from Mueller but from across the board and across the country, it's more of a WHICH hunt.

Oh, and btw, HRC lost and is a retired grandmother … get over it.

https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1007682528952639490

TRUMP-RUSSIA UPDATE
Flynn: CONVICTED
Gates: CONVICTED
Papadopoulos:
CONVICTED Manafort:
INDICTED and JAILED
Cohen: READY TO COOPERATE
Sater: READY TO COOPERATE
Nader: COOPERATING
Prince: CAUGHT in PERJURY
Sessions: CAUGHT in PERJURY
Trump Jr.: CAUGHT in PERJURY
Trump Sr.:
Van der Zwaan: CONVICTED and JAILED
Stone: INDICTMENT EXPECTED
Kilimnik: INDICTED and AVOIDING TRIAL
Page: COOPERATING but CAUGHT MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS
Ivanka: UNDER INVESTIGATION
Kushner: UNDER INVESTIGATION
Internet Research Agency: INDICTED
 

Attachments

  • C8lUU6dXsAA_7dx.jpg
    C8lUU6dXsAA_7dx.jpg
    32.2 KB · Views: 20
That is about the most idiotic spin yet.

And much of it based solely on semantics. The branch of semantics to which I refer, for the under or non informed lefties out there, means words that can be manipulated to influence human thought and action.

The use of political bias, for instance. What about just proving bias...which is abundantly proven throughout the report. Along with actions taken that is traitorous.

The report IS damning, it cannot be truthfully said to be otherwise.

There is no evidence anywhere known of ANY Trump collusion. The OIG report was damning in aspects, ie, that Comedy was ripe for justifiable termination and that with such questionable provenance as to what created any credible belief in such collusion (not a crime remember), that the muels probe has far outlasted an ostensible mandate it never had in the first place.

Comedy committed crimes anywhere from the illegal leaking of classified materials, illegal and unauthorized removal of official FBI documents, lying under oath, etc...all the way up to administering unequal justice contra the 14th amendment...not my favorite but certainly applicable in this case.

Y'all are just comical, cant see your own noses...probably buried too deep where the sun seldom peeks.

its a vox article as far as reliability it is right up there with the dailiy kos.
it is just another liberal blog hack site.

so of course they are not going to be objective in anything they said.
 
Back
Top Bottom