Bill Clinton wished he could. He was relegated to Hillary, rape, sexual harassment charges, and well...
:lamo And you think it's a contest between Clinton and Trump? You really don't see how moronic you come across when you do things like this? Oh well...you just keep doing what you do, zimmer. LOL.
And, for the record, I believe at last count the list of credible rape and sexual assault allegations against your dear leader
[it really does seem like you people are to Trump what the North Korea people are to Kim Jong-Un] was up to 19, wasn't it? Yes, that's about it. But again....why does this kind of petty nonsense matter so much to you and your ilk? It's a fascinating question that deserves an answer from a true-believer like you.
Men, not metro sexuals, snowflakes, or any of the 58 varieties of Democrat Genders... tend to be hot after the hottest babes they can find. But Democrats have had that neutered out of them it seems. That’s OK... they can sit with Pajama Boy and drink hot cacao.
LOL, at all of the alt-righties who consider themselves "real men", and who idolize people like Donald Trump. Pathetic is a strong word....but I'm close to using it right now. :lamo
My guy in 2000 was Alan Keyes. Smoke that.
And.....? What EXACTLY are you trying to prove to me? Please, be candid in your response.
Obama, as Geraldine Ferraro intimated (you know who she is?) made it to the podium of the primaries because of his melanin level... for he had no skill set that proved he could handle the job. And we learned... he couldn’t;t handle the job.
"We", huh? Geraldine Ferraro, huh? LOL. Well, first....I can only presume that when you say
"we', you mean
"me and other alt-righties who think like me", right? The rest of us non-haters and non-alt-righties recognize that Obama's presidency had plenty of successes and will go down as one of the top 10-20 in American history. And with regard to Ferraro, it's funny to see the way people like you cling to selected quotes and remarks in a way that ALWAYS reaffirms their existing biases, and NEVER challenges them, isn't it? LOL. I could cherry pick plenty of quotes from republicans that could be considered predictive of the scandal-plagued and embarrassing disaster that has become the Trump administration....but it wouldn't matter to someone like you who sees facts and truths as "liberal" or "conservative".
PS... Obama has no legacy. It’s gone... except for the pens.
This has become a bit of a wet dream scenario for you, I see. You'll be disappointed, though. So just prepare yourself for that, ok?
You obviously not familiar with Andrew Sullivan? No surprise there.
Teaching Moment: Right wingers like you need to understand that OPINIONS are not hard news. Sullivan's opinions are not valid simply because they reaffirm the wet dreams of millions of alt-righties like you who are bent on erasing the legacy of a black president from our history. Things are not so, just because some columnist writes an OPINION PIECE that reaffirms your existing biases about a given issue, zimmer. Only in the conservative media universe do OPINIONS substitute for objective facts, data or research. We see this happen ALL the time with righties. And the effects of this tactic are revealed every day on board like this one, where clueless right wingers like you attempt to engage the rest of society in debate only to wonder why their op/eds and personal feelings are not accepted as equal to the objective news, data and research they seek to rebut.
As for Andrew Sullivan, he is actually a thoughtful conservative voice. Not a true supply-sider and not a Neocon. But his opinions are those of a traditional consevative who once opposed Obama only slightly less than the McCain/Palin combo that was advocating the same policies (i.e. supply-side economics and neoconservative foreign policy) that almost ruined the entire civilzed world under the last republican presidency. Not sure why you would think posting his opinions means ANYTHING to someone capable of thinking and reading for him- or herself.