• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Devin, Come Out, Come Out, Wherever You Are

At some point Trump supporters are going to have to deal with the fact that Mueller and his team just sticks to their knitting, doing their jobs, underpaid I might add. The FBI and Intel generally has a few stupid people that do stupid things on occasion. But the money is not good enough for them to be wildly corrupted as some would claim. These are not jobs that people do for the connections or the graft.They are competent public servants by a wide margin. They do these jobs because they are good at them and they believe in their work.

In the meantime, Trump has got Justice and the Intel community bent over a desk banging them two at a time and the best question Trump supporters can come up with is "Is that a mid-century modern desk or a traditional desk".

But I don't want to dissuade anybody. It is entertaining.
 
Last edited:
He has a meeting and you can't wait more than a day until you're antsy about it? Maybe it was something as simple as how they are going to go about fulfilling the demands for information that the DOJ is required by law to provide them and how to avoid getting contempt slapped on them.

I’m not antsy, Nunes hasn’t exactly demonstrated discipline if he has ammunition. My opinion is that if Nunes got something, he runs with it. How’s the TDY working out?
 
Meanwhile Schiff has already said there was no evidence of a spy offered. There....isn't it easy when you don't have to make something up.

So, why are then the liberals and their media running with stories like spying/investigating/FBI-informant-insertion in the Trump camp was only to protect Trump and Co?!?
 
So, why are then the liberals and their media running with stories like spying/investigating/FBI-informant-insertion in the Trump camp was only to protect Trump and Co?!?

That is an interesting but twisted assertion.
 
I’m not antsy, Nunes hasn’t exactly demonstrated discipline if he has ammunition. My opinion is that if Nunes got something, he runs with it. How’s the TDY working out?

I dunno...he waited a while to come out with his assessment of the premises on which the wiretaps were based. I haven't seen him have anymore of a proclivity to rush to the camera than his Democrat counterpart, Schiff, maybe lesso.

TDY is going OK...one more week to go but at least I have a 4 day this weekend.
 
Hannity has the night off and that Jean woman and her guests have gone off the rails.:lamo
 
So, there was a meeting today between DoJ and Republican committee members. What improprieties were revealed? If there were any, I would think Nunes would be in multiple press conferences. Was there nothing of use learned?

They got classified information. You won't see them spilling it to the press. (not even Schiffty would be so dumb)
 
They got classified information. You won't see them spilling it to the press. (not even Schiffty would be so dumb)

They would not have had to release classified information to push the "spy" narrative along. Mitch McConnell for example could have pushed the spy narrative along if he chose with just a change to a word or two in his statement. Instead Mitch poured cold water on it again without releasing any classified information. Nunes could just as easily have poured hot water on it without releasing classified information though myself I probably would choose a sharper tool for that purpose than Nunes. Nunes didn't because he didn't have anything. If anything they are probably trying to come up with some tortured dialog that helps them not end up looking foolish again as they did with the BIG NUNES MEMO release.

Rudy is classic Rudy claiming that he Rudy was waiting for a debriefing from attendees so that they could plan their next steps in the defense of the President. Just Hilarious Rudy as usual.
 
Last edited:
They got classified information. You won't see them spilling it to the press. (not even Schiffty would be so dumb)

Never stopped Nunes before. His silence, and those of his gang, speaks volumes.
 
They would not have had to release classified information to push the "spy" narrative along. Mitch McConnell for example could have pushed the spy narrative along if he chose with just a change to a word or two in his statement. Instead Mitch poured cold water on it again without releasing any classified information. Nunes could just as easily have poured hot water on it without releasing classified information though myself I probably would choose a sharper tool for that purpose than Nunes. Nunes didn't because he didn't have anything. If anything they are probably trying to come up with some tortured dialog that helps them not end up looking foolish again as they did with the BIG NUNES MEMO release.

Rudy is classic Rudy claiming that he Rudy was waiting for a debriefing from attendees so that they could plan their next steps in the defense of the President. Just Hilarious Rudy as usual.

Never stopped Nunes before. His silence, and those of his gang, speaks volumes.

Leaking classified info is Schiffty's style. Nunes declassified info first.

Sorry, but y'all are just going to have to wait for the indictments. I'd say late Aug or so...starting with McCabe.
 
Somebody on the internet summed up today's pencil-neck Schiff's comment:

"Schiff is playing semantics. There was no spy (according to Democrats it was an investigator, to Comey it was a human resource). There was no spy inside the Trump campaign (the spy was not inside the Trump campaign, he tried to dirty up people inside the campaign and pump them for information but was not inside the campaign himself, although he volunteered to join the campaign). Schiff saw no evidence because no evidence was handed over today, it was just a briefing."
 
Leaking classified info is Schiffty's style. Nunes declassified info first.

Sorry, but y'all are just going to have to wait for the indictments. I'd say late Aug or so...starting with McCabe.

Nunes is not the President. He can't declassify anything.

I just have to laugh. The pleas from the Right get more strident by the minute.
 
So, there was a meeting today between DoJ and Republican committee members. What improprieties were revealed? If there were any, I would think Nunes would be in multiple press conferences. Was there nothing of use learned?

He's gonna rustle up another batch of those "memos" he's famous for. They always bring the Obama/Clinton Deep State to its knees. "Lock her up!"

Nothingburger explained here:
https://www.gq.com/story/spygate-conspiracy-theory-explained
 
Nunes is not the President. He can't declassify anything.

I just have to laugh. The pleas from the Right get more strident by the minute.

sigh...

He HAD it declassified first.

Okay?

:roll:
 
Leaking classified info is Schiffty's style. Nunes declassified info first.

Sorry, but y'all are just going to have to wait for the indictments. I'd say late Aug or so...starting with McCabe.

:lamo
 
Somebody on the internet summed up today's pencil-neck Schiff's comment:

"Schiff is playing semantics. There was no spy (according to Democrats it was an investigator, to Comey it was a human resource). There was no spy inside the Trump campaign (the spy was not inside the Trump campaign, he tried to dirty up people inside the campaign and pump them for information but was not inside the campaign himself, although he volunteered to join the campaign). Schiff saw no evidence because no evidence was handed over today, it was just a briefing."

There was no spy because there was no spy. Its not semantics. A Spy is a Spy and an Informant is an Informant. MY God a five year old would have gotten this by now. Maybe this is a good test for whether people are carrying valid ID's and are thus old enough to vote. "Do you know that there is a dif between a spy and an informant within the context of criminal investigation?"

"Yes I do". Outstanding...you are old enough to vote.
 
If anyone needs an exorcism it is Shifty Schiff and add Mark Warner to the list too.

It isn’t fair to readers if you keep all of the evidence to yourself,
actually supporting that Schiff or Mark Warner are deceivers.
At least post links of your sources supporting Schiff or
Warner unreliability, vs Nunes reliability!
 
Back
Top Bottom