• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

James Clapper did NOT say what Donald Trump keeps saying he said

trouble13 said:
I see you resorting to snark now that you've run out of reasonable arguments

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I've still got content. You only have conjecture based on conspiracy theories. Proving you ran out of content a long time ago.
 
iguanaman said:
The FBI used the most unobtrusive and reserved method available for the investigation of Russian influence in the Trump Campaign. The could have showed up with badges and risked it being leaked the press if they truly were "out to get" Trump. The FBI has and has had a very vocal group of Trumpers that were behind Comey's announcement 11 days before the election. They threatened to leak the laptop story if Comey didn't do it first. There is no doubt in the video (and there are others too) below that Rudy knew that Comey "October Surprise" was imminent. His close relationship with FBI members in the NY office is legendary.

Click to expand...


Why didn't they give President Trump a heads up?
 
apdst said:
They planted moles in his campaign. Why didn't they tell him about the threat?
Click to expand...

They did, repeatedly.

I find it interesting that you are using language that indicates you see America as a hostile foreign power.
 
late said:
They did, repeatedly.

I find it interesting that you are using language that indicates you see America as a hostile foreign power.
Click to expand...

Link?
 
apdst said:
Link?
Click to expand...

The FBI briefs all campaigns, it's SOP, and they were worried about the Russians. What I find interesting is their reaction to Sally Yates telling them there was a problem (with Manafort).
 
Chomsky said:
My take, in general:

"If Trump says it, it's likely a lie"

Which of course implies he should not be in office ...
Click to expand...

Didn’t Obable have Trumps wires tapped, y’all said that was a lie .
Everything Trump says that the Obable administration did , first y’all laugh then it comes out to be true, but the MSM never let’s their sheep know that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Chomsky said:
The FBI is under no obligation to inform the subjects of their investigation. Nor should they be. This is nonsense.
Click to expand...

I can’t believe y’all are so stupid that it’s ok to put a spy in s candidates campaign.
But now that Trump is your President he should do it to the next democrat, that’s ok now right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
MrShangles said:
That’s fine, all the real investigations are starting to get going, so this is gonna get fun isn’t it. Get your safe space stocked with plenty of fresh crayons.
The truth will set you free!
Go Trump, keep making America great.
Click to expand...

Republicans are trying to trash the FBI, and they are lying their ass off to do it.
 
iguanaman said:
The FBI used the most unobtrusive and reserved method available for the investigation of Russian influence in the Trump Campaign. The could have showed up with badges and risked it being leaked the press if they truly were "out to get" Trump. The FBI has and has had a very vocal group of Trumpers that were behind Comey's announcement 11 days before the election. They threatened to leak the laptop story if Comey didn't do it first. There is no doubt in the video (and there are others too) below that Rudy knew that Comey "October Surprise" was imminent. His close relationship with FBI members in the NY office is legendary.
Click to expand...

Haha. Here's an idea. How about you get a warrant from a judge and then spy on Russians. Or wiretap. Again, do this all WITH A WARRANT. From what we've learned, it seems that this started before any warrant was obtained (and even that warrant was obtained with dubious evidence).
 
phattonez said:
Haha. Here's an idea. How about you get a warrant from a judge and then spy on Russians. Or wiretap. Again, do this all WITH A WARRANT. From what we've learned, it seems that this started before any warrant was obtained (and even that warrant was obtained with dubious evidence).
Click to expand...

Here's an idea for you. Go to Moscow and bring your case to the Kremlin. Russian spies are not protected by our Constitution. We are free to monitor their communications with impunity and that has always been true.
 
phattonez said:
Haha. Here's an idea. How about you get a warrant from a judge and then spy on Russians. Or wiretap. Again, do this all WITH A WARRANT. From what we've learned, it seems that this started before any warrant was obtained (and even that warrant was obtained with dubious evidence).
Click to expand...

Wait, you think if I tell the FBI something about you, that requires a warrant? You serious?
 
Mach said:
Wait, you think if I tell the FBI something about you, that requires a warrant? You serious?
Click to expand...

If they hired you to spy on me, yes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom