• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Flynn Jr.'s "You're All Going Down." Tweet Has Washington Buzzing

Stop, WCH. Comey never said the FBI believed he wasn't guilty. What Comey said was that agents said his body language did not indicate he wasn't lying. And Flynn pled guilty to lying.

You are just too deep in the Fake Noos Cycle.
 
Whenever anyone on the right cites Comey as a source, it's important to remind them that they think Comey is a liar.

It's almost as if they cherry pick when he's credible and when he's not to serve a confirmation bias that Trump did nothing wrong, and the investigation is over after striking out at the plate.

Like they do with polls.

Polls say Trump is unpopular - "Is that the same poll that said Clinton was going to win?". Polls say Trump is popular - "Look how much everyone wuvs The Donald!"
 
Hillary's Gay Mafia pays me. In food stamps.

The subject line of this thread drew you in. You thought this was about a bunch of lesbian women in a room together with Hillary Clinton in the center of the circle, didn't you?
 
I thought Comey was a liar? Should he have said what you purport he said, then, I guess he's credible when it exonerates Trump campaign officials and lying when it doesn't.

The truth of the matter is that Flynn was in hot water over a host of nefarious practices, including failure to register as a foreign lobbyist, and he is cooperating with the special counsel.

How many does that make cooperating with the special counsel, now?

He's a friggin enigma.
 
Flynn was facing a lot of serious charges. I wonder what he confessed to that got the charges reduced so drastically.
 
Flynn lied to the FBI and we as yet don't know exactly why. But Flynn has committed a crime and has plead guilty in front of a judge that would have forced him to agree that he was pleading guilty because he was in fact guilty.

Not so fast, doesn’t the judge want to see Mueller’s scope of investigation, didn’t judge tell Mueller it looks like he os just trying to pressure Flyn into flipping on Trump. So hold up on that guilty plea story


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Not so fast, doesn’t the judge want to see Mueller’s scope of investigation, didn’t judge tell Mueller it looks like he os just trying to pressure Flyn into flipping on Trump. So hold up on that guilty plea story


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Manafort...keep your criminals straight will ya'
 
Not so fast, doesn’t the judge want to see Mueller’s scope of investigation, didn’t judge tell Mueller it looks like he os just trying to pressure Flyn into flipping on Trump. So hold up on that guilty plea story


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No. The criminal being discussed by the judge is Paul Manafort, Trump's onetime campaign manager. Not Michael Flynn, Trump's onetime NSA. And the judge didn't tell Mueller anything. Mueller wasn't in the courtroom.
 
Whenever anyone on the right cites Comey as a source, it's important to remind them that they think Comey is a liar.

It's almost as if they cherry pick when he's credible and when he's not to serve a confirmation bias that Trump did nothing wrong, and the investigation is over after striking out at the plate.

That's the MO. Just like when Trump having learned the 'Art of Demonizing' demonizes the NYTimes, then later, turns around and uses [it] as a source.
 
I'm watching from the Deep State. Obama's shadow government pays me to post on here.

I don't think so, assuming you don't the gravitas (power) to be deep state. If you are...watch your back.
 
No. The criminal being discussed by the judge is Paul Manafort, Trump's onetime campaign manager. Not Michael Flynn, Trump's onetime NSA. And the judge didn't tell Mueller anything. Mueller wasn't in the courtroom.

So what did the judge say to Mueller’s team? Did I get that right, you didn’t debate that part!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
.....and I've been charged with having a one-track mind ?

with such a dated view, maybe the allegation should have been that it's an 8-track mind
 
Not so fast, doesn’t the judge want to see Mueller’s scope of investigation, didn’t judge tell Mueller it looks like he os just trying to pressure Flyn into flipping on Trump. So hold up on that guilty plea story


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And the judge will be censured if appealed. He is to look only at the charges presented on this case. A judge has no purview
to question the prosecution except as a matter of law concerning the case in front of him. A judge has no legal purview to
question who is charged or any other role played by the US atty., only the case at issue.
 
Back
Top Bottom