How white women use strategic tears to silence women of colour

I've seen this coming for a while, and to be honest, I'm laughing my ass off. The SJWs are begining to eat their own. Minority women are increasingly becoming hostile to progressive white feminist women, and it makes perfect sense considering white feminists have been at the helm of the victim-culture industry for the past 50 years, indoctrinating young minorities into the mindset of beliving they've been royally screwed in life, thanks to white men.

An essential part of SJW victim-culture is to hate authority, and the tables are turning on white feminists who've been much of the authority in many of these progressive movements.

At a recent forum in Australia, a brown woman panelist voiced the opinion that white people are **** (begins with an s). When a white woman in the audience objected to being compared to **** and complained, it warranted this article being published on a major British news site to explain how brown women hate white women anyway.


https://amp.theguardian.com/comment...void-accountability?__twitter_impression=true

truthatallcost said:

I've seen this coming for a while, and to be honest, I'm laughing my ass off. The SJWs are begining to eat their own. Minority women are increasingly becoming hostile to progressive white feminist women, and it makes perfect sense considering white feminists have been at the helm of the victim-culture industry for the past 50 years, indoctrinating young minorities into the mindset of beliving they've been royally screwed in life, thanks to white men.

An essential part of SJW victim-culture is to hate authority, and the tables are turning on white feminists who've been much of the authority in many of these progressive movements.

At a recent forum in Australia, a brown woman panelist voiced the opinion that white people are **** (begins with an s). When a white woman in the audience objected to being compared to **** and complained, it warranted this article being published on a major British news site to explain how brown women hate white women anyway.


https://amp.theguardian.com/comment...void-accountability?__twitter_impression=true

Click to expand...

The feminist establishment has been getting the finger from young women as well, which is astonishing considering that Feminist HQ is on the University full of young women.

Slut walk as just one example is something that the young demanded and got over the objections of the establishment.

The Establishment you see wanted to go in a different direction.

They got told, and stood down.

truthatallcost said:

I've seen this coming for a while,

Click to expand...

That's funny.

and to be honest, I'm laughing my ass off.

Click to expand...

That's even funnier.

The SJWs are begining to eat their own. Minority women are increasingly becoming hostile to progressive white feminist women,

Click to expand...

They are increasingly becoming hostile to WFW who pretend they are progressive but are actually acting like racist white men who like to pretend that everything is all of a sudden hunky dory for people of color because their outright racism is not tolerated as it was not so long ago.

and it makes perfect sense considering white feminists have been at the helm of the victim-culture industry for the past 50 years, indoctrinating young minorities into the mindset of beliving they've been royally screwed in life, thanks to white men.

Click to expand...

Can you point to any other group, other than white men, who have been responsible for the genocides, the virulent racism, the lynchings, the rapes, the ... ?

An essential part of SJW victim-culture is to hate authority, [neat trick, inserting your male, right wing, meme] and the tables are turning on white feminists who've been much of the authority in many of these progressive movements.

Click to expand...

Pure BS.

At a recent forum in Australia, a brown woman panelist voiced the opinion that white people are **** (begins with an s). When a white woman in the audience objected to being compared to **** and complained, it warranted this article being published on a major British news site to explain how brown women hate white women anyway.

Click to expand...

More pure BS. This time your own sources illustrates that you are, from one end, seriously misrepresenting to, on the other end, outright lying.

One of the panellists, Winnie Dunn, in answering a question about the harm caused by good intentions, had used the words “white people” and “****” in the same sentence. This raised the ire of a self-identified white woman in the audience who interrogated the panellists as to “what they think they have to gain” by insulting people who “want to read their stories.”

In other words, the woman saw a personal attack where there wasn’t one and decided to remind the panellists that as a member of the white majority she ultimately has their fate in her hands.

Ibid

Click to expand...

Hawkeye10 said:

The feminist establishment has been getting the finger from young women as well, which is astonishing considering that Feminist HQ is on the University full of young women.

Click to expand...

Syntactically that is a mish mash. An uninformed opinion that is barely understandable.

Slut walk as just one example is something that the young demanded and got over the objections of the establishment.

The Establishment you see wanted to go in a different direction.

They got told, and stood down.

Click to expand...

More mish mash. What are you going on about?

camlok said:

Can you point to any other group, other than white:shock: men, who have been responsible for the genocides, the virulent racism, the lynchings, the rapes, the ... ?

Click to expand...

Black people? Yellow people? Brown people with beards? EVERYBODY?!?! Mao wasn't white. Neither were (are) Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, Sani Abacha, Kim Il Sung, Omar al-Bashir, Robert Mugabe, Assad (Daddy and Junior), Charles Taylor, Do-dum-do-dee-da-do.... "White" has nothing to do with being an asshole.

Traditionally the feminist movement has always brushed aside minorities for the sake of convenient expedience. You see it in the #metoo movement. If she says it, believe it!

As Amy Schumer pointed out though, if a minority woman says it, you better be skeptical because they always lyin'!

And whoa betide a minority man be accused of rape/sexual assault/ etc. They will harange him and do everything in their power to see him convicted. But when it comes to the Harvey Weinstein's of the world, they will turn all kinds of blind eyes to it.

Minority women in the feminist movement have been getting shunted to the side for a very long time.

he current movement loves to talk about "intersectionality" but the very essence of what intersectionality is focusing on minority women's rights. Its based on a lawsuit that a Black woman brought up against General Motors. She protested that there were unfair hiring practices and GM countered that because BLACK MEN and WHITE WOMEN were being hired, she wasn't discriminated against. You see that today as well.

The Google director of diversity was a Black woman. When she said that six blonde haired blue-eyed men could be diverse, the feminists pounced even though what she said was 100% correct! The "feminists" were determined to get that Black woman fired and they succeeded. They insisted on getting her replaced with a White woman.

There's also the case of Ghost In The Shell. Feminists demanded that an Asian woman not get the lead role of Motoko Kusanagi. Scarlett Johanssen got the job over all the other Asian women who would have been a better fit. And in a dispay of outright arrogance, Johanssen gloated that Asian women should be happy because at least a woman got the job, which was wildly dishonest: the character of Motoko Kusanagi was always going to be a woman.

The feminist is easily one of the most transparently racist organizations in modern history. It exist almost exclusively for the benefit of privileged White women. They don't even work for poor or middle-class White women, just affluent White women. Its obvious.

The sandwich tastes the same, no matter what color the woman is who makes it.

Hawkeye10 said:

The feminist establishment has been getting the finger from young women as well, which is astonishing considering that Feminist HQ is on the University full of young women.

Slut walk as just one example is something that the young demanded and got over the objections of the establishment.

The Establishment you see wanted to go in a different direction.

They got told, and stood down.

Click to expand...

The slut walk was crazy beyond belief and you see how quickly that died out. But the OP, in my opinion, reflects more than striking out against a "feminist" slant, it reflects a decades-old resentment held by black women. For some reason, and I really don't know why, it seems that black men are attracted to white women more than white men are attracted to black women - Megan Markle aside. I caught a bit of an Oprah show years ago where black women were furious about it. They saw white women as taking what was theirs and they were mad as hell.

It seems as though there is still a social hierarchy of sorts -- white males at the top, then either black males or white females (never can figure that one out) but at the bottom are black females -- so, everyone in the hierarchy above them is a target. Consider the comment of the black women in the OP -- that "whites are sh*t." There's no way in the world a white woman could get by with saying blacks are sh*t, right? But the black women gets to say it. What does that leave for the white woman? Tears. And, if she uses them correctly -- she'll make the black woman look like an ass -- which is what the black woman is for saying that.

The SJW idea that white men should feel ashamed of who they are is spreading now to white women (by black women). It's not something that's fair or equal, it's a form of revenge for what minorities perceive as an unfair advantage.

Perhaps being white is an advantage of sorts, but so is being artistic, or being a mathematical whiz, being super-motivated, or being stunningly good looking. There are many things that create advantage in this world, and no one should ever be ashamed of something they have no control over. As parents, we teach our children to use the skills and gifts they've been given to make a good life for themselves, and now, the SJWers decide we should teach them to feel ashamed of who they are. That's complete BS.

If black women are going to attack white women, expect white women to use what they have in their social arsenal to stand up for themselves. And, if that means tears -- so be it. I prefer words, but I understand what those women are doing.

I can care less about women beating up on each other.

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk

Ahlevah said:

Black people? Yellow people? Brown people with beards? EVERYBODY?!?! Mao wasn't white. Neither were (are) Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, Sani Abacha, Kim Il Sung, Omar al-Bashir, Robert Mugabe, Assad (Daddy and Junior), Charles Taylor, Do-dum-do-dee-da-do.... "White" has nothing to do with being an asshole.

Click to expand...

You have a point except that the discussion here isn't about international bad guys. This is about the white guys, in western nations, US, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, ... who have been responsible for the genocides, the virulent racism, the lynchings, the rapes, the ... ?

So, can you point to any other group, other than white men, who have been responsible for the genocides, the virulent racism, the lynchings, the rapes, the ... ?

Hawkeye10 said:

The feminist establishment has been getting the finger from young women as well, which is astonishing considering that Feminist HQ is on the University full of young women.

Click to expand...

That's true, but the modern feminist agenda still wields a lot of influence over the our culture. It's worse in other parts of the world, like the UK for example.

Well white women are the least discriminated against minority (In the minds of other minorities), so they naturally become the next target.

I find it amazing that all these Asians both born here and imported get all these great paying jobs, have great educations, do better in tests then everyone else and nobody hates them. It must be a color thing, people of color just don't like that we've shed our color, I guess. (I don't really know, just tossing out a random thought.)

camlok said:

You have a point except that the discussion here isn't about international bad guys. This is about the white guys, in western nations, US, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, ... who have been responsible for the genocides, the virulent racism, the lynchings, the rapes, the ... ?

So, can you point to any other group, other than white men, who have been responsible for the genocides, the virulent racism, the lynchings, the rapes, the ... ?

Click to expand...

Well, if you limit the discussion to just white assholes then I guess it's easy to conclude that the only assholes are white. :lol:

Ahlevah said:

Well, if you limit the discussion to just white assholes then I guess it's easy to conclude that the only assholes are white. :lol:

Click to expand...

For purposes of "How white women use strategic tears to silence women of colour" yes.

Can you point to any other group, other than white men, who have been responsible for the genocides, slavery, the virulent racism, the lynchings, the rapes, the ... in the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, UK, ... ?

Originally Posted by Hawkeye10
The feminist establishment has been getting the finger from young women as well, which is astonishing considering that Feminist HQ is on the University full of young women.

truthatallcost said:

That's true, but the modern feminist agenda still wields a lot of influence over the our culture. It's worse in other parts of the world, like the UK for example.

Click to expand...

What's true? Hawkeye makes some grand, totally unfocused statement that has no meaning whatsoever.

Why shouldn't women/people who are sick of the centuries of misogyny/unbelievable ignorance from white males who consider themselves privileged for no good reason wield a lot of influence over our culture. They make good points and they have done a great deal of good for our culture.

truthatallcost said:

That's true, but the modern feminist agenda still wields a lot of influence over the our culture. It's worse in other parts of the world, like the UK for example.

Click to expand...

You failed to deal with your 1) lying, or 2) poor reading skills, or 3) your narrow, partisan view on page one. Which was it?

truthatallcost: At a recent forum in Australia, a brown woman panelist voiced the opinion that white people are **** (begins with an s). When a white woman in the audience objected to being compared to **** and complained, it warranted this article being published on a major British news site to explain how brown women hate white women anyway.

Click to expand...

camlok: More pure BS. This time your own sources illustrates that you are, from one end, seriously misrepresenting to, on the other end, outright lying.

One of the panellists, Winnie Dunn, in answering a question about the harm caused by good intentions, had used the words “white people” and “****” in the same sentence. This raised the ire of a self-identified white woman in the audience who interrogated the panellists as to “what they think they have to gain” by insulting people who “want to read their stories.”

In other words, the woman saw a personal attack where there wasn’t one and decided to remind the panellists that as a member of the white majority she ultimately has their fate in her hands.

Ibid

Click to expand...

Does the truth mean anything at all to you?

camlok said:

Can you point to any other group, other than white men, who have been responsible for the genocides, slavery, the virulent racism, the lynchings, the rapes, the ... in the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, UK, ... ?

Click to expand...

You can pick any point in history and make note of societies/civilizations that tended to dominate others for various reasons. It wasn't that the dominated were any more virtuous than their victors. They just tended to draw the short stick. In the case of North American Indians, their biggest foe wasn't the white man's gun. It was Smallpox, and I don't think you can blame just the guys for that. But in addition to disease, the tide of European immigration and westward expansion were against the natives. That doesn't mean that indigenous peoples weren't enslaving each other, mutilating each other, raping each other, or otherwise attempting to annihilate each other, as in the case of the Huron and Algonquin versus the Iroquois Confederation. They often were, and in a manner that was every bit as brutal as what the Europeans brought with them.

Incidentally, you list some great countries there. You must find it amazing that people from Africa, Asia, the Middle East, Latin America--virtually every place on the planet where you'll find few white men--are traveling vast distances in leaky boats or packed like cattle in poorly-ventilated trucks, climbing fences, joining caravans, paying coyotes their life savings, etc.--to live in countries dominated by racist, genocidal, abusive, privileged white rapists! :lol: