• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Supershe island is not hateful, but discriminatory

Celebrity

DP Veteran
Joined
May 13, 2016
Messages
5,257
Reaction score
761
Location
VT, USA
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
I was watching Jordan Klepper on The Opposition talking about SuperShe Island, where no men are allowed, last week. This island is a unique example of female male relations, although the inhabitants are generically female. I want to discuss why it is not a hateful concept, and what it means to ban men from this island. Secondly, I think this island provides some insight about female leadership which might be generalized.

Since I'm not allowed to go there, I will just analyze it from afar. The motivation for discussing discrimination against men is to explain how women can empower one another without men. Women have shown us just how important this quality is. We even refer to it as a feminine quality. When a man has many friends with whom he can empathize, he might be 'in touch with his feminine side.' Therefore, women who go here to build relationships or perhaps freely express themselves individually do not necessarily hate men.

Compare this island to a fictional white nation. The island is off the coast of Finland, a country which has a primarily Caucasian ethnic composition. A white nation which bans all other ethnic groups is racist, but it is not hateful by default. However, it is unlikely that such a sovereign nation could become both established and recognized by other nations, and SuperShe Island is a private island governed by Finland.

Because a pregnant woman should theoretically be allowed to become a member of this exclusive island, it is possible that such a woman may not disclose the sex of her male child. Technically, boys are not men, so it is also theoretically possible for children to exist on this island. We have seen this dynamic work in the past, when women share resources and help one another. It is an important part of society. But is it mature to have a fantasy of escaping adult men? Suppose a pregnant woman gave birth to a boy on the island. In order to better include the mother, her child should also be permitted to stay. The island is specifically marketed to corporate groups as a retreat for women. The primary purposes of SuperShe Island is to exclude men, and its secondary purpose is to leave obligations of adulthood behind.

A hierarchy still exists in this island. The founder or some other entity might act as a guide for new arrivals, and some women probably cater to guests, like housekeeping at a hotel. Since no man is in charge of this island, a woman has to lead in some capacity. I wonder if there is an all-female EMS squad on site. Hopefully these guests are able to generate some parallel leadership skills or develop new skills. If their skills are applicable in the rest of society then they should be able to lead men.

Now, this island is unique because it is different than the rest of the world. Because the rest of the world (for the most part) is inhabited by men to some degree, any man is the average representative of a population which is geographically complementary to SuperShe Island. What this island should tell us is that men are prototypical human beings, relative to an inhabitant of SuperShe Island. I think it's important to remember that many of these female guests do not hate men just because they go to an all-female island. In fact, they deserve it. Women deserve women's rights, peace of mind, and a vacation from work. But women's rights pertain to women only, and not necessarily men. SuperShe island may be a special island, but it does not govern the rest of the world. We should be mindful of the fact that women's rights are deserved, but not misandry by default, and that sometimes the two are inaccurately combined under one term.
 
You sure put a lot of thought into this. Personally I have no problem with women and men having places they can go that only allow their own sex. It is definitely discrimination but not all discrimination is bad.
 
Capacity eight to ten people.
Sorry, I just do not see any comparison to state sanctioned racial discrimination.
Membership is private, the island does not serve the general public.
 
They would get more members if they installed a chocolate fountain, banned all mirrors, blasted dance music all over, and had others do all the domestic work.
This I learned every time when my wife's three sisters come to visit.
I had to play peace keeper 50 times a day.
It was finally settled when i took over all the domestic chores and left them to their leisure.

Wine and chocolate saves lives!

The stories i could tell.
 
That's the name they came up with? Oy.
 
Capacity eight to ten people.
Sorry, I just do not see any comparison to state sanctioned racial discrimination.
Membership is private, the island does not serve the general public.

The OP is proposing SuperWhiteIsland, a country even, would not be hateful? That's so funny but so stupid.
 
Someone has to explain this to me. I don't get it.
From the article
[h=2]“Women need to spend time with other women. Being on vacation with men can cause women to become sidetracked, whether it’s to put on a swipe of lipstick or grab for a cover-up.[/h]

I put on lipstick when I feel like it, not when a man is around. They need to go back to the beginning. What type of women are we talking about exactly?
 
A female only, (or male only for that matter), 8.4 acre, 10 person island just doesn't rate on my list of things I'll ever get bent out of shape over in the world we live in today.
 
You sure put a lot of thought into this. Personally I have no problem with women and men having places they can go that only allow their own sex. It is definitely discrimination but not all discrimination is bad.

They already do, it's called "Hobby Lobby"

:mrgreen:
 
Back
Top Bottom