Oh lovely. One of those conversations.
Well, before I begin let me lay my cards out on the table and say what no one has asked of me, in case I am accused of being a closet-Zionist. I am not. I am an unapologetically pro-Israel Conservative Republican who believes the creation of Israel was a good thing; that the United States tacitly and begrudgingly accepting their right to exist at the United Nations in 1948 was a good thing; oh, and I also that Jews do not somehow secretly run the world solely for their own benefit and to the detriment of all other non-Jewish people. So I am not a closet Zionist. I am an open loud-and-proud non-Jewish Zionist.
With all that having been said, it must be asked, first of all, who exactly is the "West" in all this? Certainly, specific European, African and Middle Eastern governments have sought to abridge the rights of Jews, and sought their extermination. But to my knowledge, neither the United States government nor any state government within the United States, nor Canada, nor any country in the Western Hemisphere has oppressed Jews.
Do certain European governments owe debts to certain Jews, perhaps? I think the argument could certainly be made. Were Jewish families dispossessed of certain property, such as art, jewelry or other heirlooms or artifacts that could be returned to them? Absolutely. But I do not believe the "West" as a whole is somehow collectively guilty for the Holocaust or anti-Jewish oppression, or that Jews as an entire group are somehow collectively entitled to some kind of handout. I do not believe in communal blood guilt of all Westerners, any more than I believe that all Jews to this day (or any Jews to this day for that matter) are collectively responsible to this day for the death of Jesus.
It's ridiculous, and, frankly, I this whole thread seems to tailor-made to stoke anti-Jewish resentment for such presumptuousness.