• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Tweets Riddle?

biff_poindexter said:
They have no significance, its clear that the Justice Dept just like handing out indictments and convictions for fun -- except when those indictments and convictions are against people you don't like -- then its justice -- but as the Constitution states and I am paraphrasing "that aint how sh*t goes"

...but since you may be of the people who pride themselves on being about law and order -- are you willing to concede now that since the DOJ and FBI are so corrupt, that we should go and revisit ALL of the federal convictions made in the past 8 years (since Obama is the reason everything is corrupt)??

Or is your selective outrage just over all things to do with your massa Trump?
Click to expand...

Yes. They have no significance. One was about misremembering the day or time of a visit to a Russian dignitary, for crying out loud. How many of your 20 deal with the Russian collusion with the Trump campaign? How many deal with someone's cab business?:lamo
 
#WhiniestPresidentEver
 
Zyphlin said:
In such a case I'd likely suggest that Trump's intention and meaning behind such a line would be that he'd be likely to exhaust all authority he has to force executive branch agencies to take the broadest approach possible in determining what things needed to be classified and held outside of congresses purview.

Jeez, how CRAAAAAZY of me, interpreting Trump's statement as meaning he'd take action that's one could arguably suggest is available to the President in a fashion that would most likely help his desired outcome. Truly generous of me :roll:
Click to expand...
The "CRAAAAAZY" and "generous" part is the ignoring of the context surrounding the comment, including the multiple times he's directly intimated he'd interfere with the Justice Department because they aren't, as Trump once said, "totally protect(ing)" him. It ignores the fact the Trump administration once claimed to take a hard line on leakers, but Congress has proven itself one of the worst offenders of being leakers. It ignores Trump seemed to have no such urgency with reviewing documents when it came to the Democrats response to the Nunes memo about FISA warrants. Heck, even the rest of the tweet suggests a "rigged" system.

The CRAAAAAZY and generous part of you comment is the fact it seems to be completely inconsistent with Trump's words and actions as President.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom