• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's Slanders Causing America's Free Press to Lose Respect

The press is responsible.
 
The press is responsible.

The press, in THIS country, is NO longer a public service like it used to be.
It is now a consumer product, and as such, it is bound NOT to providing objective coverage of news and information but rather, to providing "whatever it thinks its demographic wants to see and hear."
That is basic consumerism 101.

Want that to change?
Then work to restore the press to being a public service once again.
 
https://www.thedailybeast.com/us-slips-again-in-world-press-freedom-index?ref=home

Everything we know of what is happening in the world outside our own experience we learn from the press. We need to respect it more and heed the slanders of
our untruthful President less.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/hatred-journalists-rise-worldwide-watchdog-says-094115269.html

They have earned it.

They stood by while the elite multi nationalists swapped out American jobs for call centers in India and changed America into a multinational nations of tribes, then if that wasn't enough, they are trying to run a president out of town they don't like by feeding their ground game incomplete or flat out dishonest interpretation of news.

The need to walk up to the pyre of the left wing and wonder if the left will spare them when they are no longer useful.
 
The press, in THIS country, is NO longer a public service like it used to be.
It is now a consumer product, and as such, it is bound NOT to providing objective coverage of news and information but rather, to providing "whatever it thinks its demographic wants to see and hear."
That is basic consumerism 101.

Want that to change?
Then work to restore the press to being a public service once again.


Like back when we had those little civil defense triangles on our AM radios?

That ship has sailed. We have an entire generation who has never felt a threat. Their life has been on auto pilot too long. They don't understand the need for truth.
 
https://www.thedailybeast.com/us-slips-again-in-world-press-freedom-index?ref=home

Everything we know of what is happening in the world outside our own experience we learn from the press. We need to respect it more and heed the slanders of
our untruthful President less.

Here's an idea. If the Press wants to maintain a good reputation, they might want to drop the bias and start reporting the facts.

This is just a crybaby hit-piece by people who have dug their own graves.
 
I like Ben Shapiro's thoughts on this. I don't want The New York Times, The Washington Post or CNN to go away. I want them to do their jobs as journalists like they are supposed too. Everyone makes mistakes, and nobody excepts the press to be perfect. however, when they make mistakes that(politically) only go in one direction in every occurrence you would be a fool to ignore the blatant bias on display.
 
Let's forget the Daily Beast's take on this, and cut directly to the chase:

This ranking not about the popularity or perceived POV, or even accuracy of the press. It is about freedom of the press!

Here's the original source:

PWB Country Rankings

And please note this list is about the Press' relative freedom in relationship (primarily) to government. In other words, how much freedom the ranked country's government allows.

For example: Trump broke long standing tradition at last night's official State Dinner, by not only not inviting Democratic Congressmen, but also not inviting members of the press or media. This is in part what the Press Freedom Index measures. It measures government censureship & transparency, among other things.

And this is why our freedom slipped, under Trump.
 
The press, in THIS country, is NO longer a public service like it used to be.
It is now a consumer product, and as such, it is bound NOT to providing objective coverage of news and information but rather, to providing "whatever it thinks its demographic wants to see and hear."
That is basic consumerism 101.

Want that to change?
Then work to restore the press to being a public service once again.

Not true. But if you believe that stop watching the news, stop reading the news, stop talking about the news, and stop pretending you know things you could only have learned about through the press.
 
Last edited:
The media is responsible for the loss of respect with the years of bias reporting.
 
Like back when we had those little civil defense triangles on our AM radios?

That ship has sailed. We have an entire generation who has never felt a threat. Their life has been on auto pilot too long. They don't understand the need for truth.

Not exactly.
There's a much simpler reason why we don't have the old Civil Defense symbols anymore.
Much of the United States has moved beyond the old AM radio service.
Terrestrial radio in general is on life support.

But even so, ALL commercial radio stations are now participants in EAS, because it is required as part of their commercial broadcast license.
When an EAS alert goes out, it's not only broadcast on ALL available AM and FM frequencies, it's also broadcast on all available television frequencies, all available cable channels and all available commercial broadcast satellite channels, as well as all available wireless cell phone sites.
https://www.ready.gov/alerts

To date, the internet is not as yet connected to any global emergency alert system however, that being said, it is highly likely that FEMA is actively working on setting up such a system, which for now is called IPAWS.
https://www.fema.gov/integrated-public-alert-warning-system

What I was referring to was related to the agreement between broadcasters back in the days of the Fairness Doctrine.
Commercial broadcasters operated news departments as nonprofit public services. News departments did not lose money, and broadcasters traded on the prestige of their news departments commitment to providing accurate and objective news and information. The result was a profit anyway despite the independence of the news department. The broadcasters were fulfilling their obligation as part of their responsibility as FCC license holders entrusted with the public airwaves.

Today it would look a lot different because the public airwaves comprise only a very small part of the information infrastructure, so a fairness doctrine would operate in ways which are different. A cable news channel cannot survive as a strictly nonprofit public service, so "news SHOWS" would continue as before however they might be clearly labeled, or else the straight news would be clearly labeled and kept separate.

As it stands now, the only real actual source of objective and impartial news is found on the TICKER at the bottom of the screen on most cable news channels.

So, the old Fairness Doctrine isn't strictly applicable in traditional form, because like you said, that ship has sailed.
But it doesn't change the fact that nearly ALL NEWS in the United States is sold as a consumer product instead of as a public service.
And that is the reason why news media seems slanted. They don't have a choice.
That's what needs to be fixed.
 
I like Ben Shapiro's thoughts on this. I don't want The New York Times, The Washington Post or CNN to go away. I want them to do their jobs as journalists like they are supposed too. Everyone makes mistakes, and nobody excepts the press to be perfect. however, when they make mistakes that(politically) only go in one direction in every occurrence you would be a fool to ignore the blatant bias on display.

Newspapers and cable news are vastly different in the way that they operate.
In fact, if the NYT were to open their OWN cable news channel in competition WITH the likes of CNN or FOX, the NYT channel would operate in ways which are vastly different from its newspaper. The 24 hour cable news cycle forces them to operate differently, and so does the profit incentive.

All that having been said, what's missing in the US cable news environment is a separate, even sequestered, portion of the broadcast day devoted to HARD NEWS. The only real source of hard news, other than coverage of breaking stories, is found on the TICKER at the bottom portion of the screen on most cable news channels.

If you want an example of what a "public service" cable news channel would look like, the closest I can recommend is
Reuters TV.
It is not perfect but it is far more objective, impartial and accurate than the typical American cable channel.

Reuters TV: Live Breaking News, US, World, Business, Finance
 
The press is responsible.



For?

Please, fill me in. I was a journalist for 30 years.

The weakest argument that can be made is blame "the press" like they are some secret society that meets in smoky back rooms and decide who will be the asshole.


Here's the truth. Some Americans to this day blame "the press" for Watergate...as if it was the press who ordered the break in, the press that ran the cover up and probably for Gerald Ford too.

"The world" is laughing at you because of such things as Trump's childish tweets, where there is no press "filter", for mocking a disabled reporter which I am sure the "press" never had a hand in.

So now little lyin' Stable Genius is being accused of all sorts of sexual escapades, frolicking with Russian whores like a hedonistic adolescent and it's "the press" who are "responsible....

for what exactly? For reporting on what is claimed about him? Reporting his tweets, empty denials? "The press" is responsible for all his outright lies? It's their fault he's lied so much NOTHING can be believed?

Is it "the press" who are responsible for your bully man insulting the heads of other nations, picking fights with the Lord Mayor of London, criticizing emergency responses in country's he's never been to? When you drop your drawers and **** on people you make enemies...that's why the world is disgusted and laughing
 
Let's forget the Daily Beast's take on this, and cut directly to the chase:

This ranking not about the popularity or perceived POV, or even accuracy of the press. It is about freedom of the press!

Here's the original source:

PWB Country Rankings

And please note this list is about the Press' relative freedom in relationship (primarily) to government. In other words, how much freedom the ranked country's government allows.

For example: Trump broke long standing tradition at last night's official State Dinner, by not only not inviting Democratic Congressmen, but also not inviting members of the press or media. This is in part what the Press Freedom Index measures. It measures government censureship & transparency, among other things.

And this is why our freedom slipped, under Trump.

Why should Trump invite them when they constantly look for ways to spin things against him?
 
https://www.yahoo.com/news/hatred-journalists-rise-worldwide-watchdog-says-094115269.html

They have earned it.

They stood by while the elite multi nationalists swapped out American jobs for call centers in India and changed America into a multinational nations of tribes, then if that wasn't enough, they are trying to run a president out of town they don't like by feeding their ground game incomplete or flat out dishonest interpretation of news.

The need to walk up to the pyre of the left wing and wonder if the left will spare them when they are no longer useful.

If you want to speak of dishonest interpretation of the news, look no further than Fox.
 
Why should Trump invite them when they constantly look for ways to spin things against him?

No one is purposefully looking for ways to spin things against trump. The problem is two fold- first he changes his mind constantly, and secondly lies constantly. If you can see this, you live in an alternate universe.
 
No one is purposefully looking for ways to spin things against trump.

That's a bunch of BS.

Heck, we saw that just yesterday with that Mulvaney thing. We saw it this morning with that Morning Joe thing. We saw it with that thing when Melania wore the wrong kind of shoes to go to Peurto Rico.

We've been seeing it since Trump came down that escalator in 2015 with that Mexican thing.

Sorry, they can't constantly attack Trump and expect him to be nice to them.
 
That's a bunch of BS.

Heck, we saw that just yesterday with that Mulvaney thing. We saw it this morning with that Morning Joe thing. We saw it with that thing when Melania wore the wrong kind of shoes to go to Peurto Rico.

We've been seeing it since Trump came down that escalator in 2015 with that Mexican thing.

Sorry, they can't constantly attack Trump and expect him to be nice to them.

Trump is attacked because he lies constantly
Has no moral compass
Does care to learn anything
Takes credit for other peoples success
Has no idea what he is going

Take your choice, the list could be a whole lot longer
 
Trump is attacked because he lies constantly
Has no moral compass
Does care to learn anything
Takes credit for other peoples success
Has no idea what he is going

Take your choice, the list could be a whole lot longer

Complete, utter bull****.

Quit making excuses for the media's behavior.
 
If you want to speak of dishonest interpretation of the news, look no further than Fox.

If it wasn't for Fox you never would have heard of James Comey, Andrew Mc Cabe, or Peter Struzk or his squeeze. Not to mention Mueller being in charge of the FBI when Uranium One went down.

Fox brings it. You may not like it, but they report you decide.

CNN is flat out boring.
 
Back
Top Bottom