• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kimba Wood officiated Soros' wedding

You wouldn't be saying that if she was friends with a Conservative.

Its not something I'm concerned about.

Now if she was friends with the defendant. Or dating the prosecutor.

That might be reason for concern.

Your position requires extreme partisanship being the rule of the day with judges.

I know for a fact that there are good, honest people who disagree with me completely politically.

Therefore, I do not presume unprofessional behavior from those on the "other" side.
 
Here come the insults. :lamo

Well, you do live for them, Ap. Just say thanks, and start your next CT thread... ;) lolz.

I think this might be a stretch, though...in fact, if I didn't know better, I'd say you are being sarcastic and making fun of Liberals by proposing something as ridiculous as you feel their arguments are.

How'd I do, do I get a cookie?
 
Suuuuuure you would!...lol

Kimba Wood is a female, btw.

So if a judge is married and his wife or husband decides to become a radical (but legal) activist he must quit the bench?
 
Senator Al D'Amato was a republican. President Reagan is a republican god. Unanimously confirmed, and has served since 1988, dealing with the likes of Michael Milken, and other high profile cases. She however once officiated a wedding, which Adpst thinks disqualifies her from further service.

All true, also left out of her Wikipedia page: She was a very strong candidate for Attorney General under Bill Clinton. She is qualified to perform a wedding in New York.
 
Her friendship with Soros makes her suspect to political bias.

This came out before dark. I can just imagine what happens by the end of the week. :lamo

Do you want judges to be unbiased and uninfluenced by politics?

Oh the things that cause you to go into a pearl clutching fervor....:lamo
 
Obviously you would.

Why do you say that? I'm a progressive and don't much care for Duke's vision for the country... :roll:

I didn't ask the question, you did... so instead of snarky deflection, a mainstay of your 'debate' ahhh guess some would call it style, how about you answer your own question....

Would YOU be ok with a judge who was friends with David Duke??? :confused:
 
Why should she recuse herself because she officiated at someone else's wedding? A person who is not connected to this case in any way shape or form?

Truth be told, you are trying to attack the judge. Since there is little else to do on your side, get to it.

She has a clearly globalist agenda and was once a playboy bunny.

She should definitely recuse herself.
 
She has a clearly globalist agenda and was once a playboy bunny.

She should definitely recuse herself.

She spent 5 days training to be a bunny, and left before ever working. Do you think she has a NDR with Trump?
 
You wouldn't be saying that if she was friends with a Conservative.

Reagan appointed Judge Wood to the court on the sponsorship of republican senator Al D'Amato.

How rigged does the system need to be stacked in Cohen's favor to end your whining?

Can you name anyone else served with search warrants who had the juice to influence the POTUS to
describe the issuance on approval by a magistrate and execution of the search warrants as a break-in
AND an attack against the country?

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/918291-if-the-facts-are-against-you-argue-the-law-if
“If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you,
pound the table and yell like hell”
Carl Sandburg

Why do Trump supporters exhibit no self awareness? Before Trump, were you making any conscious effort to
avoid appearing ridiculous? You are not making any effort, now.

[https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-biased-against-trump/?utm_term=.742985e3fae4
[h=1]An increasing number of Americans see the FBI as biased against Trump[/h]by Philip Bump by Philip Bump Email the author Politics

April 17
....Appointing a third party to review material seized from Cohen in an FBI raid last week “will protect the integrity of the Government’s investigation from the toxic partisan politics of the day and attacks on the impartiality of the Justice Department,” a letter from Cohen’s legal team on Monday read. Earlier, the letter noted that “there is a growing public debate about whether criminal and congressional investigations by the government are being undertaken impartially, free of any political bias or partisan motivation.”
In court, Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas McKay was incredulous: Those “toxic partisan politics” were being driven by Cohen and his client. McKay noted that there were three parties involved in the Cohen dispute — the state, Cohen and Trump — and that only two of those parties had responded to the raid with “inflammatory comments.” Cohen, he argued, was trying to “drum up media attention” and then point to that media attention as a reason to remove the government from the process of evaluating the material seized from Cohen.
..

...Those numbers aren’t quite right. A new poll released by NPR, PBS NewsHour and Marist University shows that about 3 in 10 Americans think that the FBI is biased against the Trump administration (the question that most closely approximates Harrison’s point). Sixty-one percent of Americans think that the FBI is just doing its job...




...In court on Friday, Trump’s attorney went to great pains to note that she didn’t want to cast aspersions on the government when asking that Department of Justice prosecutors not be granted the ability to determine what material seized from Cohen was or wasn’t covered by attorney-client privilege. But she didn’t need to: Her client has repeatedly used his prominent pulpit to cast those aspersions to a much bigger audience.

McKay’s point about who was propagating the anti-FBI rhetoric ended up being set aside. Judge Kimba Wood didn’t give Cohen and Trump what they wanted — but she did note that there may be an increased need to demonstrate that the process was free from bias.
Attitudes about the FBI appear to have shifted just in time for Cohen’s legal team.
....
 
Last edited:
Reagan appointed Judge Wood to the court on the sponsorship of republican senator Al D'Amato.

How rigged does the system need to be stacked in Cohen's favor to end your whining?

Can you name anyone else served with search warrants who had the juice to influence the POTUS to
describe the issuance on approval by a magistrate and execution of the search warrants as a break-in
AND an attack against the country?



Why do Trump supporters exhibit no self awareness? Before Trump, were you making any conscious effort to
avoid appearing ridiculous? You are not making any effort, now.

Kick and scream all you want, but this attempted coup is going to fail. The people will insure that.
 
Back
Top Bottom