- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
So what?
You wouldn't be saying that if she was friends with a Conservative.
So what?
Which is anytime Conservatives tell the truth. :lamo
Her political bias obviously motivated hee conduct on the bench. That's unacceptable.
You wouldn't be saying that if she was friends with a Conservative.
Here come the insults. :lamo
Would you feel that eay if a judge was friends with David Duke?
Yes I would feel the same way if he was MARRIED to David Duke.
Suuuuuure you would!...lol
Kimba Wood is a female, btw.
Oh noes....Soros!But, there's nothing fishy, I'm sure--according to the Libbos.
Wood should be investigated to see if she's been involved in any inappropriate conduct for a Federal judge.
https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSBRE98J0XZ20130922
Senator Al D'Amato was a republican. President Reagan is a republican god. Unanimously confirmed, and has served since 1988, dealing with the likes of Michael Milken, and other high profile cases. She however once officiated a wedding, which Adpst thinks disqualifies her from further service.
Would you feel that eay if a judge was friends with David Duke?
Her friendship with Soros makes her suspect to political bias.
This came out before dark. I can just imagine what happens by the end of the week. :lamo
Do you want judges to be unbiased and uninfluenced by politics?
So you'd be ok with a judge being friends with David Duke??? eace
Obviously you would.
Why should she recuse herself because she officiated at someone else's wedding? A person who is not connected to this case in any way shape or form?
Truth be told, you are trying to attack the judge. Since there is little else to do on your side, get to it.
She has a clearly globalist agenda and was once a playboy bunny.
She should definitely recuse herself.
You wouldn't be saying that if she was friends with a Conservative.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/918291-if-the-facts-are-against-you-argue-the-law-if
“If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you,
pound the table and yell like hell”
― Carl Sandburg
[https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-biased-against-trump/?utm_term=.742985e3fae4
[h=1]An increasing number of Americans see the FBI as biased against Trump[/h]by Philip Bump by Philip Bump Email the author Politics
April 17
....Appointing a third party to review material seized from Cohen in an FBI raid last week “will protect the integrity of the Government’s investigation from the toxic partisan politics of the day and attacks on the impartiality of the Justice Department,” a letter from Cohen’s legal team on Monday read. Earlier, the letter noted that “there is a growing public debate about whether criminal and congressional investigations by the government are being undertaken impartially, free of any political bias or partisan motivation.”
In court, Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas McKay was incredulous: Those “toxic partisan politics” were being driven by Cohen and his client. McKay noted that there were three parties involved in the Cohen dispute — the state, Cohen and Trump — and that only two of those parties had responded to the raid with “inflammatory comments.” Cohen, he argued, was trying to “drum up media attention” and then point to that media attention as a reason to remove the government from the process of evaluating the material seized from Cohen.
..
...Those numbers aren’t quite right. A new poll released by NPR, PBS NewsHour and Marist University shows that about 3 in 10 Americans think that the FBI is biased against the Trump administration (the question that most closely approximates Harrison’s point). Sixty-one percent of Americans think that the FBI is just doing its job...
...In court on Friday, Trump’s attorney went to great pains to note that she didn’t want to cast aspersions on the government when asking that Department of Justice prosecutors not be granted the ability to determine what material seized from Cohen was or wasn’t covered by attorney-client privilege. But she didn’t need to: Her client has repeatedly used his prominent pulpit to cast those aspersions to a much bigger audience.
McKay’s point about who was propagating the anti-FBI rhetoric ended up being set aside. Judge Kimba Wood didn’t give Cohen and Trump what they wanted — but she did note that there may be an increased need to demonstrate that the process was free from bias.
Attitudes about the FBI appear to have shifted just in time for Cohen’s legal team.
....
Reagan appointed Judge Wood to the court on the sponsorship of republican senator Al D'Amato.
How rigged does the system need to be stacked in Cohen's favor to end your whining?
Can you name anyone else served with search warrants who had the juice to influence the POTUS to
describe the issuance on approval by a magistrate and execution of the search warrants as a break-in
AND an attack against the country?
Why do Trump supporters exhibit no self awareness? Before Trump, were you making any conscious effort to
avoid appearing ridiculous? You are not making any effort, now.
But, there's nothing fishy, I'm sure--according to the Libbos.
Wood should be investigated to see if she's been involved in any inappropriate conduct for a Federal judge.
https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSBRE98J0XZ20130922
Kick and scream all you want, but this attempted coup is going to fail. The people will insure that.