- Joined
- Sep 3, 2010
- Messages
- 120,954
- Reaction score
- 28,531
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
So yesterday we get a report that the Special Counsel may indeed have evidence of direct and strong collusion between top Trump officials and Russians to coordinate parts of the Russian assistance to the Trump campaign.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-russia-investigation/?utm_term=.9ab5ad1035da
And what happens on the same day? We get the air strikes in Syria which completely then dominate the news.
Can anybody say WAG THE DOG?
While these details have not yet been confirmed, if they are confirmed and are fact, this could well be the smoking gun proving the collusion between Russians and the Trump campaign.
For those not believing the WAG THE DOG theory, just go over to the CNN web page and see what is getting the majority of coverage today and where the Cohen story is buried.
this analysis goes further
https://www.vox.com/2018/4/13/17236660/michael-cohen-prague-trump-steele-dossier
This could be the key piece of the puzzle.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-russia-investigation/?utm_term=.9ab5ad1035da
Interesting to not that the first reports about Cohen doing this came in the Steele dossier that is so hated and reviled and despised and attacked by the right wing Trump supporters.McClatchy reported on Friday evening that special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s team has evidence of a trip by President Trump’s personal lawyer to Prague in the late summer of 2016. Overseas travel to non-Russian countries might strike some observers as an incremental — if not unimportant — development in Mueller’s probe. That is not the case. Confirmation that Cohen visited Prague could be quite significant.
A trip to Prague by Cohen was included in the dossier of reports written by former British intelligence official Christopher Steele. Those reports, paid for by an attorney working for Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee, included a broad array of raw intelligence, much of which has not been corroborated and much of which would probably defy easy corroboration, focusing on internal political discussions in the Kremlin.
And what happens on the same day? We get the air strikes in Syria which completely then dominate the news.
Can anybody say WAG THE DOG?
While these details have not yet been confirmed, if they are confirmed and are fact, this could well be the smoking gun proving the collusion between Russians and the Trump campaign.
For those not believing the WAG THE DOG theory, just go over to the CNN web page and see what is getting the majority of coverage today and where the Cohen story is buried.
this analysis goes further
https://www.vox.com/2018/4/13/17236660/michael-cohen-prague-trump-steele-dossier
That’s because the claim that such a meeting happened is one of the most specific claims in Christopher Steele’s dossier alleging collusion between the Trump team and Russia to influence the 2016 election — and because, since the very first day that dossier was publicly released, Cohen has adamantly denied taking any such trip, and Trump’s team has relied on that denial to dispute the dossier’s accuracy. “I have never been to Prague in my life. #fakenews,” Cohen tweeted on January 10, 2017, hours after the dossier was posted.
Yet a new report from McClatchy’s Peter Stone and Greg Gordon claims that special counsel Robert Mueller has evidence that Cohen did, in fact, enter Prague through Germany at the height of the 2016 campaign, in “August or early September.”
The McClatchy report is based on anonymous sources, and we don’t yet know what the purported evidence is. It could still prove to be mistaken. (Cohen himself didn’t comment.)
But if it is in fact accurate, the report would utterly devastate one of the Trump team’s leading arguments that there was no Trump-Russia collusion. That’s because, to be blunt, there is no reason for Cohen to try to debunk the Steele dossier by lying and saying that he didn’t visit Prague at all if he actually did, unless he was trying to cover up extremely serious wrongdoing that happened during that visit.
If Cohen did in fact visit Prague in 2016, but for innocuous reasons that Steele’s sources twisted, he could have just said that at the time. Instead, he vociferously denied that he went to Prague at all. If that was false, there would be no reason for him to take that tack — unless he was trying to cover up something very serious and hoping to ge
This could be the key piece of the puzzle.
Last edited: