- Joined
- Nov 16, 2017
- Messages
- 69,203
- Reaction score
- 63,898
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Not even close to funny. Damned inappropriate and hateful.
Maybe he thought McCain was already dead.
Not even close to funny. Damned inappropriate and hateful.
McCain should just shut his warmongering piehole.
If it were up to him, we'd be neck-deep in a war with Iran now.
Maybe he thought McCain was already dead.
NPR is not exactly an unbiased source.
However, nice cherry picking of the article.
I noticed that you left this out:
Since we now know Obama later had to put a few hundred military advisers and 1500 troops back in Iraq, we can safely conclude that the rise of ISIS was on Obama's dime.
Well, you can say the apple is a banana all you wan't. It's a free country.
Just sayin'....
Nope. He proved that in his response to me. Even if he had, which means we would first have to believe he put thought into the post, it would have still been just as inappropriate and hateful to make the comment in a post. To do so has but one purpose in mind, and I pointed that out.
Posts under which of your many ID's, sis?
There is zero evidence that the chemical attack is related to the Trump comment. That is just you and every other leftist spouting TDS nonsense.
I'm fairly sure that Turkey could would fully capable of punishing Assad and the Syrian State. The U.S. is not the "only force" we would just get it done far more quickly (if we could actually FOCUS instead of spreading our forces out so thin across many different countries simultaneously).
But, U.S. troops haven't pulled; haven't even begun to pull out. The attack had nothing to do with the announcement.
Funny how any fact you don’t like magically becomes “denial”.
Trump made his comment about pulling out.
Assad immediately gassed his own people.
Hmm.....I wonder what changed?
Turkey is far more interesting in killing Kurds than punishing Assad for using chemical weapons on civilians. Hell, if the Kurds are the best to get gassed Erdogan would give him a standing ovation.
The president announcing that we are going to do something is generally seen as being set in stone by the rest of the world. Assad didn’t want to waste any time in getting back to the slaughter.
Step away from the fake news.
You guys repeating that over and over again will not make it the truth no matter how hard you try. Not everyone is as gullible as your team seems to be.
You seem to forget that Obama was obligated to honor a previous agreement made by the preceding President, Bush.
It was President George W. Bush who signed the Status of Forces agreement in 2008, which planned for all American troops to be out of Iraq by the end of 2011.
"The agreement lays out a framework for the withdrawal of American forces in Iraq — a withdrawal that is possible because of the success of the surge," he said in a joint press conference with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki at the time.
Thousands of American troops had died, and by the time Obama announced the withdrawal, fully three-quarters of Americans supported the withdrawal (though a majority of Republicans did not).
The State Department's lawyers said troops couldn't stay in Iraq unless the Iraqi parliament authorized them to do so, including granting them immunity from Iraqi law. The Iraqi parliamentarians would never OK such a decision, with Iraqi popular opinion staunchly against U.S. troops staying.
Fact check is your friend. Use it sometimes, will you?
Study to show thyself approved..........
https://www.npr.org/2015/12/19/459850716/fact-check-did-obama-withdraw-from-iraq-too-soon-allowing-isis-to-grow
Assad might have blown that call.
That seems likely--- but the other hand, brutal dictators generally aren't all that bright, so its not too surprising that Assad would pull something like this.
Putin is the rare exception to that rule, though
Yeah and my alarm clock went off and 22 minutes later the sun rose. Did my alarm cause the sunrise too? Assad has gassed his people before. You have no idea why he did it then and you have no idea why he did it now. You hate Trump, therefore you want to blame Trump even though you have zero evidence to back up your claim. So you can stop pretending that you have anything that even remotely resembles a 'fact' for me to deny.
Yeah, that isn't true.
Gee, were you personally enforcing the rising of the sun, and without your presence it would just do whatever it wanted--- like, say, go incinerate something? And then did you say that you were no longer interested in enforcing such actions?
No?
Then you argument doesn't work. But nice try.
You and Trump have a hilarious level of persecution complex. He is the president of the United States; for better or worse, his words and actions influence decisions made by foreign regimes. Pretending that is not the case is ignoring reality, and while you are quite good at that......
So you can stop wailin about how mean you think it is that Trump's words and statements affect what other governments do, and thus that people don't just let him off the hook when he prompts an atrocity.
You are arguing against things I didnt say. I realize Trumps words have consequences. What I am arguing against is the baseless assertion of yours, and virtually every other Trump hating liberal, that his comments precipitated this chemical attack. You have exactly ZERO proof of that charge and you know it. Try being honest and admit that and we can continue on.