• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump unleashes Joe diGenova to undermine Special Counsel Mueller [W:123]

haymarket said:
I have no idea what you are talking about - other than it is NOT the topic of the thread.
Click to expand...

You really ought to quit the dishonest practice of deleting portions of posts when you quote them.
 
OpportunityCost said:
You really ought to quit the dishonest practice of deleting portions of posts when you quote them.
Click to expand...

So this is more of your personal crusade to unfairly criticize members for staying within the rules here in what they see fit to reply to. You need to take your quixotic mission to those who run the site in that case.

I reply to the relevant areas of any posters writings. And I am not alone in that as it is done every day here by many people and has been for years and years and years. If you do not want people to have that ability - you need to take it up with those who run this site as the current rules do NOT prohibit the practice you personally are so deeply offended about.
 
haymarket said:
So this is more of your personal crusade to unfairly criticize members for staying within the rules here in what they see fit to reply to. You need to take your quixotic mission to those who run the site in that case.

I reply to the relevant areas of any posters writings. And I am not alone in that as it is done every day here by many people and has been for years and years and years. If you do not want people to have that ability - you need to take it up with those who run this site as the current rules do NOT prohibit the practice you personally are so deeply offended about.
Click to expand...

As I said before you are able to do so, that doesn't mean you should. You can be within the rules and still be doing something unethical and dishonest. Why do you want to do something unethical and dishonest?
 
OpportunityCost said:
As I said before you are able to do so, that doesn't mean you should. You can be within the rules and still be doing something unethical and dishonest. Why do you want to do something unethical and dishonest?
Click to expand...

Talking about me staying within the rules and your disapproval for the rules is not the topic here.
 
tres borrachos said:
Oh totally. That's one of (many) reasons I absolutely can't watch his show.
Click to expand...

I find the right wing analysis folks are all such phonies that they all are difficult to watch, Hannity, Dentures Lou, Tucker.
But while flipping between stations this one always freaks us out:

Screen-Shot-2017-08-02-at-3.16.47-PM.png


The combination of 80's hair, the perma-scowel, the wide-set eyes, get it off the screen!
 
Mach said:
I find the right wing analysis folks are all such phonies that they all are difficult to watch, Hannity, Dentures Lou, Tucker.
But while flipping between stations this one always freaks us out:

Screen-Shot-2017-08-02-at-3.16.47-PM.png


The combination of 80's hair, the perma-scowel, the wide-set eyes, get it off the screen!
Click to expand...

Yikes. Who is that?
 
haymarket said:
Talking about me staying within the rules and your disapproval for the rules is not the topic here.
Click to expand...

Since you cannot seem to get it, it is not about rules, so quit hiding behind that. Its about ethics and honesty.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Since you cannot seem to get it, it is not about rules, so quit hiding behind that. Its about ethics and honesty.
Click to expand...

and yet another post from you attacking me for staying within the rules and at the same time you remain off topic.
 
haymarket said:
and yet another post from you attacking me for staying within the rules and at the same time you remain off topic.
Click to expand...

I am not attacking you, I am attacking your post in which you omitted conversation you didn't want to address in an unethical and dishonest manner. If you think I am off topic, you know what to do, as you are not mod so quit acting like you have authority.
 
OpportunityCost said:
I am not attacking you, I am attacking your post in which you omitted conversation you didn't want to address in an unethical and dishonest manner. If you think I am off topic, you know what to do, as you are not mod so quit acting like you have authority.
Click to expand...

You are attacking me for a posting style that you do not approve of (at least from me) but which is clearly within the rules here. You need to take us your quixotic crusade with the people who run this site and stop being off topic. And a person does NOT need to be mod to see what you are doing.
 
haymarket said:
You are attacking me for a posting style that you do not approve of (at least from me) but which is clearly within the rules here. You need to take us your quixotic crusade with the people who run this site and stop being off topic. And a person does NOT need to be mod to see what you are doing.
Click to expand...

No. I do not. I can call you out for posting dishonestly. You can be within the rules and that post be dishonest or unethical. I am NOT attacking you, I am attacking the way you post. Quit whining. Quit evading.
 
OpportunityCost said:
No. I do not. I can call you out for posting dishonestly. You can be within the rules and that post be dishonest or unethical. I am NOT attacking you, I am attacking the way you post. Quit whining. Quit evading.
Click to expand...

Please take this up with the people who run this site and quite trying to hijack the thread about something only you care about.
 
haymarket said:
Please take this up with the people who run this site and quite trying to hijack the thread about something only you care about.
Click to expand...

My problem is with you reframing my posts dishonestly and unethically by deleting material you don't want to address. That behavior is on you, not the rules. You can change that be exhibiting more ethical and honest behavior and quoting in full, like 99% of the posters on this site.
 
post said:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/us/politics/joseph-digenova-trump-lawyer.html
diGenova and his wife Toensing were due to take the field.
They are among the most extreme right legal operatives not
yet disbarred, crowbars creating a plausible scenario to dislodge
Rosenstein, Sessions, and Mueller. Trump volk have signaled they
prefer Trump evisceration of the rule of law, to rule of law itself.
40 percent fascist electorate, hats off to you!
Click to expand...

Mr. diGenova has endorsed the notion that a secretive group of F.B.I. agents concocted the Russia investigation as a way to keep Mr. Trump from becoming president. “There was a brazen plot to illegally exonerate Hillary Clinton and, if she didn’t win the election, to then frame Donald Trump with a falsely created crime,” he said on Fox News in January. He added, “Make no mistake about it: A group of F.B.I. and D.O.J. people were trying to frame Donald Trump of a falsely created crime.”

Little evidence has emerged to support that theory.
Click to expand...

Okay. This is the NYT. They don't like Trump. That's a given. But here they seem to deliberately lie. Or...maybe they haven't read that Nunes memo. One or the other.

In any case, I don't think Mueller needs to fear diGenova. The Mainstream Media needs to fear him...and it appears that the NYT does and is trying to get ahead of him.

diGenova's main strength is his media presence and ability to control interviews. I believe that's why he has joined Trump's team. When indictments start coming down the pike against those crooked FBI and DOJ people, diGenova will be instrumental in shaping the WH narrative and in combating the inevitable anti-Trump backlash from the Mainstream Media.
 
tres borrachos said:
Yikes. Who is that?
Click to expand...

Liz Wheeler on OAN OAN seems like a cheap Fox knock-off. It's not very serious or professional, so I just stop there to make my wife cringe now and then :)
 
OpportunityCost said:
My problem is with you reframing my posts dishonestly and unethically by deleting material you don't want to address. That behavior is on you, not the rules. You can change that be exhibiting more ethical and honest behavior and quoting in full, like 99% of the posters on this site.
Click to expand...

please see post 118
 
OpportunityCost said:
I am not attacking you, I am attacking your post in which you omitted conversation you didn't want to address in an unethical and dishonest manner. If you think I am off topic, you know what to do, as you are not mod so quit acting like you have authority.
Click to expand...

haymarket said:
You are attacking me for a posting style that you do not approve of (at least from me) but which is clearly within the rules here. You need to take us your quixotic crusade with the people who run this site and stop being off topic. And a person does NOT need to be mod to see what you are doing.
Click to expand...

OpportunityCost said:
No. I do not. I can call you out for posting dishonestly. You can be within the rules and that post be dishonest or unethical. I am NOT attacking you, I am attacking the way you post. Quit whining. Quit evading.
Click to expand...

haymarket said:
Please take this up with the people who run this site and quite trying to hijack the thread about something only you care about.
Click to expand...

Moderator's Warning:
That's quite enough from the both of you, thank you. There's a topic here and it's not each other. Focus on the topic only and leave all personal comments directed at each other aside. The thread derailments need to stop now. This also applies to other threads that you are both participating in and exhibiting similar behavior. It needs to end now or further action will be forthcoming.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom