When attending students are forced into participating in what amounts to a political protest, it's close enough. If I had any school aged chidren, I would be pulling them out of public school and putting them in private school about now.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Wait - who is forcing them into participating?
Yes - I understood that. And I hoped by my response you also understood that taking care of ones physical problem does not preclude also trying to take care of another physical problem. This is not an either or binary choice.
Do you think that is a workable solution?
I think its interesting that they say people are not mature enough to purchase a gun until they are 21 and then turn around and demand we take the political opinions of someone under 21 as gospel. They are to immature to manage a gun but they are fine to dictate national laws."Heh he heh, skipping school is fun"
View attachment 67229962
Funny to watch pandering liberals fawn all over these vacuous know -nothings because they support a left wing cause.
Yes, 18 year olds are knownothings. I was one one once.
who here, over 40 thinks they actually knew something when they were a senior in high school.
???
So what do y’all want the NRA to do, you guys aren’t even wanting to know why the FBI and sheriff department didn’t act on all the information they had on this guy, but as normal y’all blame the wrong folks.
Y’all want to change the age to 21, ok are you gonna change the age to go into the military to 21.
It’s all about what the media spoon feeds y’all, use some common sense for a solution.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Isn't that the whole reason of why the law was proposed in the first place? To prevent incidents such as this? Or are you admitting that these proposed laws are feel good laws without accomplishing anything?Why is that your standard to determine if a law is useful or helpful or just plain needed or not?
And how would this law help?Because we have a gun problem in our nation that is all out of any proportion to our population and the rest of the civilized world and we need to confront it and deal with it.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/12/guns-in-america-statistics/320409/
It's because they overall work when enforced. How woukd this law, even if enforced, would've stopped the mass shooting?Laws against robbery and murder do not prevent all robberies and murders. Laws requiring would-be drivers pass tests do not prevent all accidents. Laws about how much acetomenophan do not prevent all cases of death by liver failure from acetomenophan poisoning. Yet we have such laws anyway.
Isn't that the whole reason of why the law was proposed in the first place? To prevent incidents such as this? Or are you admitting that these proposed laws are feel good laws without accomplishing anything?
And how would this law help?
I think its interesting that they say people are not mature enough to purchase a gun until they are 21 and then turn around and demand we take the political opinions of someone under 21 as gospel. They are to immature to manage a gun but they are fine to dictate national laws.
I imagine if these kids were protesting for the right to arm themselves at school they would dismiss those as the opinions of children and not something we should take seriously
Its all very transparent
Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Isn't that the whole reason of why the law was proposed in the first place? To prevent incidents such as this? Or are you admitting that these proposed laws are feel good laws without accomplishing anything?
I suspect lots of different people who support various gun laws have different reasons for it. The reasons I have may be different than other people who support the same proposal.
It took hundreds of years to develop gun culture in America and its going to take a long time and many different approaches to get out of it.
Along the way we need to try many different things - some of which might work and others which might not. But its going to take lots of time and energy and effort and it will be a effort that needs to be evaluated along the way.
Thats because they dont care about the children or mass shootings. Their agenda isnt to save lives. They want to disarm everyone they dont like.That is something you will never get the libruls on this board to admit. It's not about the age of the shooter. As some have pointed out, it's common for many parents to buy guns for their responsible children. I had 2 rifles and a 16 gauge pump action shotgun by the time I was 15. I never did anything but hunting or target practice with them, and under adult supervision. The problem with the Parkland shooter was not his age, it was his state of mental illness. That's what needs to be addressed. Anyone who thinks raising the age limit for buying any legal gun to 21 will slow down or stop school shootings is playing emotional poker with themselves.
We all know your motivations. And they all fall strictly along partisan lines.
What in the blazes are you talking about? Gun ownership and the right to bear arms has been around since this nation's founding. What exactly are you specifically claiming took 200 years?
what is partisan about honoring the dead innocents?
Nothing but there is lots of partisan overtones when you use a walkout to address gun control more than a memorial. IMO it has become more about politics of gun control than remembering any victims.
perhaps to you.
Yes that's why I said IMO. I don't care if you agree with me or not. You have the right to disagree.