- Joined
- May 22, 2012
- Messages
- 104,378
- Reaction score
- 67,559
- Location
- Uhland, Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
And was turbo tax correct?
How could TurboTax be correct if it was not a version updated for the newest tax laws?
And was turbo tax correct?
Unless the NYTs is staffed and run by imbeciles its obviously a lie.
How could TurboTax be correct if it was not a version updated for the newest tax laws?
From your article...
"... a spokesperson for TurboTax’s parent company issued a statement to The Journal explaining that The Times used a program for the misleading feature that was not yet updated with the latest tax laws."
yep so it is the NYT's fault for not doing their due diligence attempted another hit piece then tried to blame someone else for their stupidity.
thanks for proving that.
this isn't turbo taxes fault it would be NYT's fault.
Oh, I'm not denying that it was a dumb mistake. Hell, I know nothing about either accounting or computer programs and I would have known to ask if the program included this recent change.
But to say that they're deliberately lying takes it to a whole new level of bad journalism. Whatever anyone thinks of the NYTimes, saying they'd deliberately lie to make a story is just plain stupid.
A middle class family earning over 180k? Where the hell do they live?
This proves that the NYTs is an honorable paper holding to the best of journalistic principles.
I often hear President Trump refer to news articles from the NYT as Fake News. The problem is the NYT will double, triple and quadruple their sources before they print.
Trump just says things.
When it comes to credibility the New York Times has built a reputation for solid journalism over many, many years. Mr. Trump has built a reputation of no credibility.
And with opening lines to a post like " In a attempt to spread lies and propaganda..." I see credibility is not something you are striving for.
They retracted it. Yet again, you embarrass yourself w/another nothing-bomb.
Not really. The NYT has been spewing hit pieces against trump since he was elected. That pretty much sums it up right there.
This was another attempt at a hit piece and they failed.
Unless the NYTs is staffed and run by imbeciles its obviously a lie.
Then conservative logical reasoning knows no bounds. It must suck to have to question everything that is considered "established." You guys are sounding an awful lot like hippies as of late. "Bring down the man." "Don't trust the establishment." "Question Everything and fear military industrial complex." These are all standard principles of new age conservatives.
..and admirable ideals that the left has long since abandoned. You're now "the establishment". The DNC is the ultimate in the "good old boys", it hammers down dissension within the ranks like no other political party in the history of this country. The Left has chosen the path of blind acceptance without proof, without question, without thought. Once these were what they fought against, now they define the American Left.
then why don't "we" worship Donald Trump? Aren't you supposed to take his word as gospel?
You don't worship him because he's not part your "Establishment". He's not a DNC approved President, so you are to oppose him at every turn like good little soldiers blindly following your leaders.
This proves that the NYTs is an honorable paper holding to the best of journalistic principles.
I often hear President Trump refer to news articles from the NYT as Fake News. The problem is the NYT will double, triple and quadruple their sources before they print.
When it comes to credibility the New York Times has built a reputation for solid journalism over many, many years. Mr. Trump has built a reputation of no credibility.
And with opening lines to a post like " In a attempt to spread lies and propaganda..." I see credibility is not something you are striving for.
Yes, really.
Lying is completely different from bias or hit pieces or laziness. If you don't understand how important the distinction is, you don't understand journalism.
Faux News is as guilty as anyone else of bias and hit pieces but, far as I know, nobody's ever said they lied. Both Fox News and the NYTimes understand that getting caught in lying would destroy their credibility and ability to sell advertising. Or at least they'd be competing for advertisers with the National Enquirer and Weekly News of the World.
Purposely distorting facts to push an agenda to most people would be called lying.
we are not talking about fox news. we are talking about the NYT's.
Yes, NYTimes. I was using Fox as an example. That's allowed, innit?
So who are you referring to that 'purposely distorted facts' in this story?
it is a deflection away from the topic.
if you don't understand the thread and what is being discussed the please go back and re-read.
i thought it was fairly evident what happened.
Speaking of deflection, who 'purposely distorted the facts' in this story?