• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Americans are such easy targets for trolls and bots

Americans have a looooooooooooooong history of being stupid & not performing their own due diligence ............
 
I think Trump can answer the OP's question.

dae476f070d6576a964375e807ed1911--political-memes-political-cartoons.jpg
 
You haven't debating anything, giving me nothing to debate back.



Hence my putting “debated” in quotes. It is not debatable that you have no evidence to support your claims, as I have pointed out. All you do is troll.
 
In other words, Putin doesn't own Trump.



I'm not "you guys" because I don't believe Putin literally owns Trump, only that Trump favors and admires Putin. My answer was in the context of whether or not Putin owns Trump, or Trump favors and admires Putin, or Trump kicks out 60 diplomats, Putin has chosen the path he is on regardless of such.
 
Hence my putting “debated” in quotes. It is not debatable that you have no evidence to support your claims, as I have pointed out. All you do is troll.

Spoken by the person who posted no facts to debate, just opinions. Opinions are a dime a dozen. Everyone's got them.
 
I'm not "you guys" because I don't believe Putin literally owns Trump, only that Trump favors and admires Putin. My answer was in the context of whether or not Putin owns Trump, or Trump favors and admires Putin, or Trump kicks out 60 diplomats, Putin has chosen the path he is on regardless of such.

Finally, we agree that Putin is going to do what he wants and that the left's rabidness in thinking that kicking out some Russians is going to stop them from interfering in other's elections. We need to concentrate on actually stopping the Russians from interfering in our elections instead of stupidly kicking out a few people and thinking that that will change their behavior when it won't.
 
Finally, we agree that Putin is going to do what he wants and that the left's rabidness in thinking that kicking out some Russians is going to stop them from interfering in other's elections. We need to concentrate on actually stopping the Russians from interfering in our elections instead of stupidly kicking out a few people and thinking that that will change their behavior when it won't.



“Finally, we agree that Putin is going to do what he wants and that the left's rabidness…”

I did not agree with you saying “the left’s rabidness.” That’s another one of your false statements that you have no evidence of.

“We need to concentrate on actually stopping the Russians from interfering in our elections instead of stupidly kicking out a few people and thinking that that will change their behavior when it won't.”

If by “a few people” you mean the 60 diplomats, I remind you that your saying so is in the wrong context. Again, they were not kicked out because of Russian election interference. I agree with what you otherwise say. Still, kicking out those diplomats was the right thing to do for the reason the US and other countries gave.
 
Spoken by the person who posted no facts to debate, just opinions. Opinions are a dime a dozen. Everyone's got them.



Again, you make a false statement. I refuted your claim “Obama utterly failed to do anything about Russian meddling at the time it was going on.” by giving facts that proved you wrong. You could not disprove those facts which refuted your claim because you couldn’t provide any evidence of such, despite being asked to do so. All I’m doing is repeating that your claim has been refuted for lack of evidence and you can’t prove wrong the evidence I’ve provided to refute your claim. Consider this matter over as all that is going on here is giving you time to troll.
 
“Finally, we agree that Putin is going to do what he wants and that the left's rabidness…”

I did not agree with you saying “the left’s rabidness.” That’s another one of your false statements that you have no evidence of.

“We need to concentrate on actually stopping the Russians from interfering in our elections instead of stupidly kicking out a few people and thinking that that will change their behavior when it won't.”

If by “a few people” you mean the 60 diplomats, I remind you that your saying so is in the wrong context. Again, they were not kicked out because of Russian election interference. I agree with what you otherwise say. Still, kicking out those diplomats was the right thing to do for the reason the US and other countries gave.

Yes, let's antagonize Russia all we can. Funny how the left doesn't want Trump to antagonize Rocket Man but they're perfectly willing to start WWIII with Russia.
 
Again, you make a false statement. I refuted your claim “Obama utterly failed to do anything about Russian meddling at the time it was going on.” by giving facts that proved you wrong. You could not disprove those facts which refuted your claim because you couldn’t provide any evidence of such, despite being asked to do so. All I’m doing is repeating that your claim has been refuted for lack of evidence and you can’t prove wrong the evidence I’ve provided to refute your claim. Consider this matter over as all that is going on here is giving you time to troll.

Obama didn't do anything to stop Russia from influencing our elections at the time it was going on. In fact, he specifically told his people to stand down. Obama waited until Hillary lost then all of a sudden he wants to do something. If Hillary had won Obama wouldn't have done anything.
 
Obama didn't do anything to stop Russia from influencing our elections at the time it was going on. In fact, he specifically told his people to stand down. Obama waited until Hillary lost then all of a sudden he wants to do something. If Hillary had won Obama wouldn't have done anything.



What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. The burden of proof in a debate lies with the claim- maker and if he or she does not meet it then the opponent does not need to argue against the unfounded claim. I need not argue any further with you and your trolling as it has been established that you have not disproved the facts of my refuting your claim.
 
Yes, let's antagonize Russia all we can. Funny how the left doesn't want Trump to antagonize Rocket Man but they're perfectly willing to start WWIII with Russia.



No evidence. More MR trolling.
 
American's have a long history of buying snake-oil from medicine show barkers.

It surprises me none we are in the fix we are in now.

Just can't fix stupid I suppose.

I am more inclined to believe that it is because we pay more attention to politics and already come with bias on-board most of the time. If you look at a lot of UK's newspapers websites, they are heavy into television and entertainment as news.
 
What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. The burden of proof in a debate lies with the claim- maker and if he or she does not meet it then the opponent does not need to argue against the unfounded claim. I need not argue any further with you and your trolling as it has been established that you have not disproved the facts of my refuting your claim.

You're just being dishonest. These are from your very own partisan rags:

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...-russian-meddling_us_5aa29a97e4b086698a9d1112

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/03/why-the-hell-are-we-standing-down/
 


No. You fail to comprehend yourself. Your claim used the term “not anything”, which is an absolute. Any single thing done, just one thing, would refute that claim. Pointing out the “stand down” does not refute the fact of what I posted that was proof did do more than “not anything.”

Your claim of “dishonesty” is a perverse accusation based on your own bad judgement. I’ve made enough honest effort to edify this matter and am moving on.
 
No. You fail to comprehend yourself. Your claim used the term “not anything”, which is an absolute. Any single thing done, just one thing, would refute that claim. Pointing out the “stand down” does not refute the fact of what I posted that was proof did do more than “not anything.”

Your claim of “dishonesty” is a perverse accusation based on your own bad judgement. I’ve made enough honest effort to edify this matter and am moving on.

I don't blame you for turning tail and running.
 
Back
Top Bottom