It takes a particularly peculiar mind to see firing Comey an act of draining the swamp. McCabe and Yates? Really?
No , you are not right, and have not shown one example of draining the swamp.
Trying to recover from laughter over the executive branch officials not lobbying for foreign governments...llollll. Which presidential advisors, precisely, are NOT engaged in extensive business with foreign governments????
Disprove ANY of that at your liesure, I wont hold my breath waiting. You might deny, but the denial without proof is but another confirmation by verifiable evidence just goes towards establishing the truth.
Much make believe substance and fact. I doubt many here require your assistance, but do continue to try...
Good lord man, excuse me, woman...ya gotta be joking.
I will ask, with very little confidence of a positive answer, do you keep up with the news at all?
Even the casual observer should know a little...besides it will be good experience for you to do a bit of research to improve your political posture and chops from slightly liberal ( read: completely off base ) to, with a bit of work, slightly right since you are overly wrong at the moment.
Now, to be and remain liberal one must innundate oneself with the false predicates put out constantly by the MSM. You can sometimes find a kernel of truth ( even a blind hog can root out an acorn occassionally) or a good article, especially in the non news areas, maybe like on cooking recipes and such, in the network news cycles or buried deep in the folds of still great bottom liners for bird cages...but all those poor trees living then sacrificing themselves only to put out mainly distortions, myths, bad fictions on such scale...its an ecological and social disaster similtaneously.
1. Comey, do you know the reasons he was fired, from the perspective of Rosenstein and Sessions? No? And yes I know very well that comey is an established ( establishment ) liar, but why would comey testify under oath that the president can legaly fire him for ANY reason the president so chooses?
2. With his experience and access to proper methods of legal whistle blowing, why would a "law enforcement" guy like comey break the law and leak classified material to an academic? There wasnt anybody, not a single person, he could go to, even on the rabidly anti T side of the aisle that comey could easily legally go to, various congressional oversight committees and the like? Ok ok, just after inauguration, I would agree, that anti T could describe both sides, but that makes it even less a necessity for comey to leak to a academic so as to leak it to a collaborating MSM that would take this hot lateral from comey and friend and run with these lies( still doing it ).Danger danger, this DOES NOT COMPUTE. Comey was fired for good and proper cause and self identifed as a snake in the DC swamp
3. Yates? She defied her own boss, the sitting president, and committed all the government under her control to noncompliance with his constitutional right and duty to ban certain foreigners from entrance to our country. Liberal judges, also part of the mini swamps located outside DC, were also attempting to undermine a sitting president. She was fired, tossed from swamp summarily while the Supreme Court upheld the president's lawful position. Swamp snake # 2 removed.
4. Mc Cabe testified under oath that he and others had signed off vouching for a dossier that comey, again under oath, testfied, establishing the file to be unverified and salacious, a document of unknown value even at that late date, hell, to this very day has no known or credible pertnent truths. After viewing the Nunes memo Director Wray rapidly convinced this major swamp rat to step down.
Duh duh duh du dun dun, another one bites the sludge, da da dun dun duh, another one bites the sludge, and another ones gone and another ones gone...
