- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 79,903
- Reaction score
- 20,981
- Location
- I love your hate.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
It's OK that you don't understand logic.
ironic post is ironic. I get what he's saying/
It's OK that you don't understand logic.
Originally Posted by Tim the plumber View Post
Badly done back room abortions cause numerous health prodlems. Women die etc.
Guns, as used by criminals in the UK, which are badly made or converted and using illegal and bad ammunition generally don't work when the criminals try to use them and they are unable to aim them as they have never had enough ammunition to try them out.
If pistols and assault weapons are banned leaving legal hunting rifles and making it necessary to have training and a knowledge of hunting, the do's and don't etc. To show some sort of ability to wander around in the country side etc and not be mad would result, generally, in the same sort of situation in the USA.
I could never agree with you on this.
You don't agree that the above would be the situation or that you would just never give up your arms?
I don't even know what your saying in that quote. Perhaps words yourself more plainly. To be clear, I will never give up my arms.
sig worthy!
HAHAHHA! Too funny, worthy of display.
I have to ask, who is the pedophile in office? Someone in office molested a child?
That was that dude's defense of Roy Moore during that debate. He wasn't saying moore was a child molestor but said in a roy moore thread that a republican child molestor is better than any democrat.
I'm not fond of either "party", how someone can make such a statement is pretty bad to say the least. I'm hoping there are some underlying context to it but, on it's own it's pretty damning.
There is no liberal logic.
There is only logic.
That you don't know that is both amusing and most telling.
Nice aphorism with that first sentence summing up the actual situation we have in our nation perfectly...it needs no enhancement. The second highlights and efficiently confirms the first. Those are, from my observance, the only two logical things youve ever expressed onsite. :wow:
:applaud Bravo :applaud
However, I think you probably just accidently slipped up giving us the real deal. Even a blind hog can root an acorn once in a while, they say.
And, fortunately for us Conservativ logic = logic. Our side never got all tripped out tripped up in movements resulting in whole lost generations due to the decay created by post modernism and the other crazy azz like thangs y'all chomp at the bit to fail at...
so nobody is talking about banning so called "assault weapons" are those not guns?First sentence: historically, that happened.
Second sentence: nobody is banning guns.
Third sentence: No.
Yawn. Your schtick is dog-eared and shopworn.
And, no, there is nothing conservative about logic. Not that you'd know, in any case.
If we do away with legalized abortion, abortions will be done in back rooms by criminals pretending to be doctors.
If we ban guns, it will stop everyone from using them.
That's logical, no?
If we do away with legalized abortion, abortions will be done in back rooms by criminals pretending to be doctors.
If we ban guns, it will stop everyone from using them.
That's logical, no?
First sentence: historically, that happened.
Second sentence: nobody is banning guns.
Third sentence: No.
so nobody is talking about banning so called "assault weapons" are those not guns?
assault weapons are guns are they not? Controlling them would be gun control.The OP simply says "ban guns." Its title is "Hmmm." Because he does not specify "assault weapons", he was not talking about just "assault weapons". He was taking aim at gun control in general.
I don't know where "so nobody" comes from, either, unless the point was to try to land some lame dishonest cheap shot, or perhaps was the result of mistake.
But that you could ever come close to rising and matching my dogeared shopworness, eh? All you can do is give it your...well, thats all you can do, it appears.
No, I will never understand, likewise aspire to never know what goes for "logic" in liberal circles, agreed.
:lamo good one, good one ( j/k) but could swear youve used it at least twice before.Lulz. As always, I accept your surrender. You may now slink back and lick your wounds as you always end up doing.
It's fun to watch you pretend you're even remotely acquainted with logic.
:lamo good one, good one ( j/k) but could swear youve used it at least twice before.
So, you fancy yourself a word guy, right? Do you by chance have any familiarity with definitions of the following: plaintive, plangent, facile, flimsy, feeble...and that particulary ubiquitously appropriate one for your postings... flaccid?
Yet at the same time, if it were not for these vain, nugatory and banal posts... you would have no posts at all. How sad for the world that, eh?
There is no particular logic on curtailing law abiding citizens gun ownership rights under the second... so that is as close as liberals can get, having logic merely mentioned in the same sentence.
Carry on.
That's because every single time we exchange posts, you end up embarrassing yourself and running off. It's what you do. Your signature move.
Yes, I know them all. I also know how to spell 'particularly' correctly. You really shouldn't ask about being a 'word guy' when you have such a difficult time using them yourself.
Man, it's clearly eating you up inside that don't know logic and you're struggling to distract people from that fact. Marxists like you try so hard and yet never get anywhere.
I accept your 2nd surrender.
Subpar.
Maybe reach back in the pickle jar a few times, do a bit more mix and match? Dunno, we ll keep our fingers crossed for ya.
LOL! You deluded yourself with the pretense that you've earned anything more than my D game. Clearly a self-defense mechanism on your part.
I accept your 3rd surrender.
Nope, that twern't it either. I hear a pickle jar calling someone's name, rhymes with end is near :lamo:2wave::lamo
If we do away with legalized abortion, abortions will be done in back rooms by criminals pretending to be doctors.
If we ban guns, it will stop everyone from using them.
That's logical, no?
Did you not see the sarcasm in my OP?Conversely ...
If we ban abortions, no one will ever get an abortion. But if we ban guns, people will still find a way to get them.
Did you not see that coming?