• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hmmm.

Originally Posted by Tim the plumber View Post
Badly done back room abortions cause numerous health prodlems. Women die etc.

Guns, as used by criminals in the UK, which are badly made or converted and using illegal and bad ammunition generally don't work when the criminals try to use them and they are unable to aim them as they have never had enough ammunition to try them out.

If pistols and assault weapons are banned leaving legal hunting rifles and making it necessary to have training and a knowledge of hunting, the do's and don't etc. To show some sort of ability to wander around in the country side etc and not be mad would result, generally, in the same sort of situation in the USA.

I could never agree with you on this.

You don't agree that the above would be the situation or that you would just never give up your arms?
 
You don't agree that the above would be the situation or that you would just never give up your arms?

I don't even know what your saying in that quote. Perhaps words yourself more plainly. To be clear, I will never give up my arms.
 
I don't even know what your saying in that quote. Perhaps words yourself more plainly. To be clear, I will never give up my arms.


sig worthy!
 
HAHAHHA! Too funny, worthy of display.

I have to ask, who is the pedophile in office? Someone in office molested a child?

That was that dude's defense of Roy Moore during that debate. He wasn't saying moore was a child molestor but said in a roy moore thread that a republican child molestor is better than any democrat.
 
That was that dude's defense of Roy Moore during that debate. He wasn't saying moore was a child molestor but said in a roy moore thread that a republican child molestor is better than any democrat.

I'm not fond of either "party", how someone can make such a statement is pretty bad to say the least. I'm hoping there are some underlying context to it but, on it's own it's pretty damning.
 
I'm not fond of either "party", how someone can make such a statement is pretty bad to say the least. I'm hoping there are some underlying context to it but, on it's own it's pretty damning.

He was just doing what hacks do when they get uncomfortable. Double down and dig in the heals. Doubt he really thinks it but his online ego wouldn't let him say differently.
 
There is no liberal logic.

There is only logic.

That you don't know that is both amusing and most telling.

Nice aphorism with that first sentence summing up the actual situation we have in our nation perfectly...it needs no enhancement. The second highlights and efficiently confirms the first. Those are, from my observance, the only two logical things youve ever expressed onsite. :wow:

:applaud Bravo :applaud

However, I think you probably just accidently slipped up giving us the real deal. Even a blind hog can root an acorn once in a while, they say.

And, fortunately for us Conservativ logic = logic. Our side never got all tripped out tripped up in movements resulting in whole lost generations due to the decay created by post modernism and the other crazy azz like thangs y'all chomp at the bit to fail at...
 
Nice aphorism with that first sentence summing up the actual situation we have in our nation perfectly...it needs no enhancement. The second highlights and efficiently confirms the first. Those are, from my observance, the only two logical things youve ever expressed onsite. :wow:

:applaud Bravo :applaud

However, I think you probably just accidently slipped up giving us the real deal. Even a blind hog can root an acorn once in a while, they say.

And, fortunately for us Conservativ logic = logic. Our side never got all tripped out tripped up in movements resulting in whole lost generations due to the decay created by post modernism and the other crazy azz like thangs y'all chomp at the bit to fail at...

Yawn. Your schtick is dog-eared and shopworn.

And, no, there is nothing conservative about logic. Not that you'd know, in any case.
 
Yawn. Your schtick is dog-eared and shopworn.

And, no, there is nothing conservative about logic. Not that you'd know, in any case.

But that you could ever come close to rising and matching my dogeared shopworness, eh? All you can do is give it your...well, thats all you can do, it appears.

No, I will never understand, likewise aspire to never know what goes for "logic" in liberal circles, agreed.
 
If we do away with legalized abortion, abortions will be done in back rooms by criminals pretending to be doctors.


If we ban guns, it will stop everyone from using them.

That's logical, no?

Great analogy and oh so true.
 
If we do away with legalized abortion, abortions will be done in back rooms by criminals pretending to be doctors.

If we ban guns, it will stop everyone from using them.

That's logical, no?

First sentence: historically, that happened.

Second sentence: nobody is banning guns.

Third sentence: No.

so nobody is talking about banning so called "assault weapons" are those not guns?

The OP simply says "ban guns." Its title is "Hmmm." Because he does not specify "assault weapons", he was not talking about just "assault weapons". He was taking aim at gun control in general.



I don't know where "so nobody" comes from, either, unless the point was to try to land some lame dishonest cheap shot, or perhaps was the result of mistake.
 
Last edited:
The OP simply says "ban guns." Its title is "Hmmm." Because he does not specify "assault weapons", he was not talking about just "assault weapons". He was taking aim at gun control in general.
assault weapons are guns are they not? Controlling them would be gun control.




I don't know where "so nobody" comes from, either, unless the point was to try to land some lame dishonest cheap shot, or perhaps was the result of mistake.

I find suggesting "assault weapons" aren't guns because they weren't specifically addressed to be dishonest.

The term assault weapon is disingenuous
 
You know it is ironic that for all the liberals supposed hatred and fear of the Russians, they are in fact their biggest ally. Do you really believe there is anything in the world the Russians and the Chinese would rather see than the USA completely disarmed?
They have to be laughing their asses off at how stupid and self defeating we are as a country.
 
But that you could ever come close to rising and matching my dogeared shopworness, eh? All you can do is give it your...well, thats all you can do, it appears.

No, I will never understand, likewise aspire to never know what goes for "logic" in liberal circles, agreed.

Lulz. As always, I accept your surrender. You may now slink back and lick your wounds as you always end up doing.

It's fun to watch you pretend you're even remotely acquainted with logic.
 
Lulz. As always, I accept your surrender. You may now slink back and lick your wounds as you always end up doing.

It's fun to watch you pretend you're even remotely acquainted with logic.
:lamo good one, good one ( j/k) but could swear youve used it at least twice before.

Hand write 'em out, do ya? Cut them into single negatory phrases, stuff a bunch of 'em in a big ol pickle jar, close the lid, shake it twelve times, then an extra shake for bad karma, put it down on the table and withdraw 2 or three of these interchageably bland, personal slams?

So, you fancy yourself a word guy, right? Do you by chance have any familiarity with definitions of the following: plaintive, plangent, facile, flimsy, feeble...and that particulary ubiquitously appropriate one for your postings... flaccid?

Yet at the same time, if it were not for these vain, nugatory and banal posts... you would have no posts at all. How sad for the world that, eh?

There is no particular logic on curtailing law abiding citizens gun ownership rights under the second... so that is as close as liberals can get, having logic merely mentioned in the same sentence.

Carry on.
 
:lamo good one, good one ( j/k) but could swear youve used it at least twice before.

That's because every single time we exchange posts, you end up embarrassing yourself and running off. It's what you do. Your signature move.
So, you fancy yourself a word guy, right? Do you by chance have any familiarity with definitions of the following: plaintive, plangent, facile, flimsy, feeble...and that particulary ubiquitously appropriate one for your postings... flaccid?

Yes, I know them all. I also know how to spell 'particularly' correctly. You really shouldn't ask about being a 'word guy' when you have such a difficult time using them yourself.
Yet at the same time, if it were not for these vain, nugatory and banal posts... you would have no posts at all. How sad for the world that, eh?

There is no particular logic on curtailing law abiding citizens gun ownership rights under the second... so that is as close as liberals can get, having logic merely mentioned in the same sentence.

Carry on.

Man, it's clearly eating you up inside that don't know logic and you're struggling to distract people from that fact. Marxists like you try so hard and yet never get anywhere.

I accept your 2nd surrender.
 
That's because every single time we exchange posts, you end up embarrassing yourself and running off. It's what you do. Your signature move.

Yes, I know them all. I also know how to spell 'particularly' correctly. You really shouldn't ask about being a 'word guy' when you have such a difficult time using them yourself.

Man, it's clearly eating you up inside that don't know logic and you're struggling to distract people from that fact. Marxists like you try so hard and yet never get anywhere.

I accept your 2nd surrender.

Subpar.

Maybe reach back in the pickle jar a few times, do a bit more mix and match? Dunno, we ll keep our fingers crossed for ya.
 
Subpar.

Maybe reach back in the pickle jar a few times, do a bit more mix and match? Dunno, we ll keep our fingers crossed for ya.

LOL! You deluded yourself with the pretense that you've earned anything more than my D game. Clearly a self-defense mechanism on your part.

I accept your 3rd surrender.
 
LOL! You deluded yourself with the pretense that you've earned anything more than my D game. Clearly a self-defense mechanism on your part.

I accept your 3rd surrender.

Nope, that twern't it either. I hear a pickle jar calling someone's name, rhymes with end is near :lamo:2wave::lamo
 
If we do away with legalized abortion, abortions will be done in back rooms by criminals pretending to be doctors.


If we ban guns, it will stop everyone from using them.

That's logical, no?

Conversely ...

If we ban abortions, no one will ever get an abortion. But if we ban guns, people will still find a way to get them.

Did you not see that coming?
 
Conversely ...

If we ban abortions, no one will ever get an abortion. But if we ban guns, people will still find a way to get them.

Did you not see that coming?
Did you not see the sarcasm in my OP?
 
Back
Top Bottom