- Joined
- Mar 27, 2014
- Messages
- 63,632
- Reaction score
- 33,663
- Location
- Tennessee
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
The difference imo is between private and public rules. I can understand where a private buisiness can restrict firearms on their property but i dont think its constitutionally sound for the gov to restrict them from their property. That is gov infringement.
And there is about 230 years or so of precedent that the 2A, like the other rights outlined in the Bill of Rights, is not absolute.
Seriously, the idea that it's unconstitutional for the government to prohibit me from carrying a Glock and an AR-15 into the Oval Office for a meeting with POTUS is just absurd.