Okay, there's some significant flaws with your logic. How exactly do you figure that our willingness to accept immigrants cause Communism & both world wars? No offense, but I have no idea what you're talking about there.
Well if we did not take in so many Irish/Eastern Europeans the Democratic voter blocs would not have been created in the North East, No voter blocs, No Wilson, No entry into World War 1.
Had we not gotten into the war German would not have funded Lenin, who they sent to Russia with about 7 Million dollars and arms and caused the Communist Uprising that turned Russian into a Communist hellscape which would in turn start exporting it in the early 20s across the world.
If we had not entered the war Germany would likely have created a peace agreement and no Treaty of Versailles which was total unjust as Germany did nothing to even start the ****ing war to begin with.
Also, I did not imply that immigration was causing our crime rate to go down, I merely pointed out that our crime rates have gone down in spite of immigration.
And think of how much lower it could be with a Wall, Deportations, and vastly limited legal immigration.
This was a direct counter to your claim that immigration was creating more crime in America; it is not, and according to the statistics, immigrants are actually more law-abiding than native-born Americans.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3099992
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jan/26/illegals-commit-crimes-double-rate-native-born-stu/
That is clearly not true.
As for your desired end goals, I certainly favor deporting illegal immigrants & skills based immigration. The ten year wait period confuses me, and requires context - is that for deported illegals? If so, why not simply put them into the skills based track with everyone else?
No, the invaders go back and their fingerprints put them on to the "Denied Entry List"
The 10 year wait is for anyone with a green card applying to to become a citizen.
I can't say I'm familiar enough with population growth to put a number on immigration at present.
Shock: 80% of U.S. population growth is from immigrants, resources being sucked dry
80% of our growth is immigrant driven, we do not need or want it.
WE allow in 1.3 million people legally, never mind the number of illegals, there is ZERO problem made better by adding millions of more people, never mind the burdens, and cost the post 1965 immigrant groups impose.
Birthright citizenship is a very old aspect of our constitution, dating back to the end of the Civil War and I have no intention of repealing it.
We are not repealing it, we are just going to exclude illegals via a simple bill.
Anchor babies, birthright citizenship, and the 14th Amendment | immigration resources reference issues Its author was very clear with its intent.
I'm ambivalent about the wall, as most of our illegal immigration is the result of people overstaying their visas - it just doesn't address the majority of the problem.
A major of them do cross illegally, never mind the drug issue. A wall will work, that is why they are built all over the world, From Greece, Saudi Arabia, to Poland, To India, To Israel, To Mexico.
As for Visa an entry and exist tracking system will make it short work.
