• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

They really believe there is a "Deep State" inside the government!!

Vetplus40 said:
Please tell me what is this "education" that you speak of. Have you ever worked one day in DC politics?
Click to expand...

It is the non educated people who rely on credentials.....they have no choice......they cant figure it out on their own.

Are you willing to admit that you are not educated?
 
Last edited:
Hawkeye10 said:
It is the non educated people who rely on credentials.....they have no choice......they cant figure it out on their own.

Are you willing to admit that you are not educated?
Click to expand...

I can just see your credentials, I watch Fox News and listen to the alt-right. Let me see, I was in the military, had a secret security clearance, and worked with those in the FBI and Intelligence agencies. Yes, I am sure you know a lot more than I do, NOT. If you believe in a deep state, you are not educated.
 
eohrnberger said:
All of which means nothing to this particular care.

You might argue that it goes to pattern, where Hillary is always breaking laws, but isn't being caught, but rather weaseling out them one way or another.

A case where Comey, in his grandstanding presser, recited for some 15 minutes all that he'd found, and all the criminal violations Hillary and her minions violated, only too summarize at the end his assessment was that no prosecutor would file charges.

Yeah, the fix was in from the start.

We now have 2 standards of law in the land. One that applies to Hillary (and other politically connected), and one that applies to all the serfs.
Click to expand...

So you are saying that Hillary got out of thirty years of trouble without a scratch by weaseling. Now that is one of the dumbest things I have seen written on this message board. Yoou don't think that it just might be she was never guilty of anything. Of course not as she is a Clinton and a Dem and that wouldn't comply with your thinking. I mean she has to be guilty of something. Well, I just mentioned the only two things for a conservative and/or a neocon she is guilty of, being a Clinton and a Dem.
 
independentusa said:
I can just see your credentials, I watch Fox News and listen to the alt-right. Let me see, I was in the military, had a secret security clearance, and worked with those in the FBI and Intelligence agencies. Yes, I am sure you know a lot more than I do, NOT. If you believe in a deep state, you are not educated.
Click to expand...

I claim that if you dont assume that the deep state is there until/unless you have verified that it is not then you are ignorant of human nature, AKA a chump.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
I claim that if you dont assume that the deep state is there until/unless you have verified that it is not then you are ignorant of human nature, AKA a chump.
Click to expand...

That is as dumb as saying you have to believe in ghosts until you can prove they aren't real. Do ever read what you write. Until I have proof the deep state exists I will keep telling you the same, it doesn't. And that makes me an intelligent person who uses his brain instead of listening to a bunch of lossers on Fox News. If wanting facts and not deciding what is human nature is makes me a chump. And are you a psychologist or a psychiatrist that you claim to "know" human nature? I guessed not.
 
independentusa said:
So you are saying that Hillary got out of thirty years of trouble without a scratch by weaseling. Now that is one of the dumbest things I have seen written on this message board. Yoou don't think that it just might be she was never guilty of anything. Of course not as she is a Clinton and a Dem and that wouldn't comply with your thinking. I mean she has to be guilty of something. Well, I just mentioned the only two things for a conservative and/or a neocon she is guilty of, being a Clinton and a Dem.
Click to expand...

The number of times the Clintons have been found in compromising situations might be attributable to overzealous political opposition, but it just as well might be attributable to the Clinton's putting themselves in such positions.

Given that over time there have been quite a number of political opposition people who have put the Clintons under testimony for questioning, so it is rather unlikely that this same overzealous trait would be shared among them all, and far more likely that the constant, the Clinton's involvement, is the source of the Clinton's compromising positions.
 
Vetplus40 said:
And I have no problem believing that people can have opinions and still do their respective jobs in an ethical manner.
Click to expand...
And they do that 'job' by taking known fabricated evidence bought and paid for by the democrat party and use it, misrepresenting it to judges as viable 'evidence' in the pursuit of warrants?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom