- Joined
- Feb 3, 2017
- Messages
- 21,239
- Reaction score
- 10,227
- Location
- NY
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Other
It's Patrick Ward - Chris Wallace's producer. He tweeted: “Two Senior FBI officials have now reviewed the Republican staff memo,” the Devin Nunes memo “a source familiar with the matter tells Fox News, adding that the officials ‘could not point to any factual inaccuracies,'”
I trust Wallace and his team. This is part of the WH review of the document in the five day window. I'm sure we'll hear more. Given that much of what is included has it's origination at the FBI and DOJ, this shouldn't be surprise. Now, I'll grant there's an un-named source(s) here, but entire constructions and many threads here have been devoted to less.
So in other words, no link. You just repeat fake news. Got it. Thanks!
Why is it fake news?
Because as it turns out, it was fake news. No names. The FBI Director said something completely different.
The textbook definition of fake news. But I think you probably already knew that.
No, I didn't. I saw the link someone else provided on another thread that was valid.
Here, I found it
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybe...accuracies-in-controversial-gop-memo-n2441862
Not sure what that link has to do with this. It doesn't name any names at the FBI. Where's the validity?
*sigh*
You're original question to humbolt was where was the link. I provided the link to which he was referring. The link was valid. That was it. Nothing nefarious in what I was posting.
However, if you want to twist what my purpose was and make the assertion that because the 'names' of the sources weren't provided, therefore making it fake news, I'd say you would have to be fair and apply that to ALL reports with sources that are not named and question the validity.