What To Expect From The House Intel Memo On. Surveillance

1) The memo will likely be released to the public — eventually.
2) The memo is a summary.
3) The memo will provide facts.
4) The memo will detail wrongdoing, but readers should keep expectations in check.
5) Expect major pushback from surveillance state.
6) Expect major pushback from anyone who latched onto the Russia-Trump collusion theory over the last year.
7) Expect conflicting messages from opponents of the summary document.
8) This is the beginning of a process, not the end.

Click to expand...

chuckiechan said:

What To Expect From The House Intel Memo On Surveillance Abuse



Each number is a corresponding explanation. Think of it like Google and Facebook having police powers. ,

It’s real, it’s big, and it should be bipartisan. Because when behavior like these agencies are accused of is excused, everyone is at risk (in the macro sense).

This is a currently unfolding story.

Do yourself and me a favor. If you are a Trump hater, don’t read this. Stick to your Trump wanted to fire Meuller” stuff.

Click to expand...

Unitedwestand13 said:

This memo nonsense was started by nunes, the same guy who had to recuse himself from his role as chairman of the house intelligence Committee because he was sending information directly to the white house.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powe...824bbb5d748_story.html?utm_term=.10d1f28d0b46

Click to expand...

Mr Person said:

Pre-emptive defense, eh?

Regardless of what those persons who defend Trump no matter what, to the point of claiming sources they accepted between the beginning of human history and 2016 are all now part of a Vast Liberal Conspiracy to hurt Trump, I will still actually wait and see.

Still, it is interesting to see a pre-emptive post that instructs us that there will be nothing to see here regarding Trump, but everything to see regarding Obama. Don't look at what was uncovered (or what may be about to drop), look at and only at Obama.. I have enough gripes with what Bush/Obama did with the NSA, but that's ridiculous.






Anyway, it remains interesting to me that an investigation about potential Russian interference in our elections and any other dirt uncovered is now supposed to be limited to just "collusion". That wasn't a problem with Hillary or Bill, was it? Why's it a problem now?





And finally, it is as well interesting to see what someone who regularly complains about "the liberal media" considers fair & balanced....

Click to expand...

Mr Person said:

You heard the orders!

Under no circumstances pay heed to news about Trump trying to fire Mueller. Look at and only at stuff that right wing media says will be damning of Obama once released!

Click to expand...