• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

This text message alone warrants an investigation

faithful_servant said:
No one else will answer my question -how about you...

Now then, since this does have the appearance of something sketchy (not saying that it is, just that it looks like it), would you support an investigation into the full chain of messages to determine of this is a case of FBI agents suppressing an investigation?
Click to expand...

Are you pretty sure the FBI hasn't looked into it? How much investigating would it take to check out an e-mail exchange between two people? You want a task force assigned?
 
eohrnberger said:
So just name calling, and no substantiative rebuttal of the present points and arguments.

So noted. You are dismissed.

(And I didn't even mention Trump once. :lamo - so who's just pushing crap?)
Click to expand...
You going to deny you're not a Trump loving supporter and Hillary hater? Just try. It/is/to/laugh.

There's nothing to rebut. What you see as "facts" have been refuted a thousand times.

One of these days you're going to have to get over the woman who has rented more space in your head than the Trump tower.

Get over it. She lost.
 
trblmkr said:
And yet, these people involved are life long republican voters.
Click to expand...

Citation please.

I didn't belittle, or poo poo or even yell. Note the absence of capital letters. I am also very disheartened by the way the Clinton stuff was done. Very unprofessional. But why in hell would Comey have released that stupid letter a week before the Election if he was in Clinton's corner?
Click to expand...

If in reference to Comey's private letter to congress about the then newly discovered email's on Weiner's laptop, he didn't release it.
A congressman on the oversight committee did, and bad on him for leaking it.

If you cannot answer that, please know that I will consider any response to this post as a hostile and ill-informed post from a Trump toady.
Click to expand...

Sorry, but no Trump toady here.

There's lots of legitimate issues to criticize Trump for.
Unfortunately the political left and the media generally ignore those in favor of their favorite baseless deplorables mantra of racists, sexist, bigot, homophone, islamophobe, etc. etc.
 
apdst said:
Do as you're told, son!
Click to expand...

As usual, you can't answer a simple yes/no question, so you divert. No way to go through life.
 
Grand Mal said:
Are you pretty sure the FBI hasn't looked into it? How much investigating would it take to check out an e-mail exchange [sic] between two people? You want a task force assigned?
Click to expand...

Seeing how the FBI claimed that the texts were lost, when they weren't, it's pretty obvious that the FBI hasn't looked into it.
 
beefheart said:
As usual, you can't answer a simple yes/no question, so you divert. No way to go through life.
Click to expand...

As usual, you cower in the face of a challenge.
 
trblmkr said:
And yet, these people involved are life long republican voters.
I didn't belittle, or poo poo or even yell. Note the absence of capital letters. I am also very disheartened by the way the Clinton stuff was done. Very unprofessional. But why in hell would Comey have released that stupid letter a week before the Election if he was in Clinton's corner? If you cannot answer that, please know that I will consider any response to this post as a hostile and ill-informed post from a Trump toady.
Click to expand...

"I didn't belittle, or poo poo or even yell."

True. Those comments were more so directed at the other poster for whom I hold less respect than for you.

For this misunderstanding I apologize.
 
apdst said:
As usual, you cower in the face of a challenge.
Click to expand...

Excuse me? I asked you a question. You failed to answer.

Do I really need to point that out to you?
 
eohrnberger said:
Citation please.



If in reference to Comey's private letter to congress about the then newly discovered email's on Weiner's laptop, he didn't release it.
A congressman on the oversight committee did, and bad on him for leaking it.



Sorry, but no Trump toady here.

There's lots of legitimate issues to criticize Trump for.
Unfortunately the political left and the media generally ignore those in favor of their favorite baseless deplorables mantra of racists, sexist, bigot, homophone, islamophobe, etc. etc.
Click to expand...

Their affiliations are common knowledge.

But he did send it, when he sent it, to congress didn't he.

Yada Yada. Terrible political times yeah?
 
Glen Contrarian said:
Try publishing the entire email chain and not just one email. There's this thing called "context" - you may have heard of it.
Click to expand...

Thread: This text message alone warrants an investigation
Click to expand...

Or, just change the title thread title to:
Thread: This tweet alone warrants an investigation
Click to expand...

Frankly, there are too many, and the USA can't afford it.
 
Paperview said:
You going to deny you're not a Trump loving supporter and Hillary hater? Just try. It/is/to/laugh.
Click to expand...

I've posted multiple times that there are legitimate criticism of Trump and his actions, and the political left and the biased media always seem to cry wolf about illegitimate criticizes. Not really my fault they with to damage their credibility by doing so.

There's nothing to rebut. What you see as "facts" have been refuted a thousand times.
Click to expand...

So you wish to believe. But wanting such, and even wanting it so badly, doesn't make it so.

One of these days you're going to have to get over the woman who has rented more space in your head than the Trump tower.

Get over it. She lost.
Click to expand...

That she lost isn't the issue.

The issue if she is going to be held to account for her criminality (reference Comey's own presser's litany of crimes she and her orb committed), as well as if this corruption in the DOJ and FBI is going to be rooted out and dealt with.
 
trblmkr said:
Their affiliations are common knowledge.

But he did send it, when he sent it, to congress didn't he.

Yada Yada. Terrible political times yeah?
Click to expand...

Comey was obligated to send it congress and it was a private letter, not a public one.
The congressmen, a Republican if I'm not mistaken, wasn't obligated to leak it.

The terrible political times are due to the political elite being incompetent and also corrupting (prompting corruption as well as not combating corruption) of the government itself to the point that even the common man can obviously see it.

Had the corruption been more skillful and subtle, it would have been far more easier to have been overlooks, but what we are seeing now is just simply so blatant and so easily revealed and uncovered.

While true, electronic communications and their storage capabilities make covering up such corruption all the harder, which may be a good thing in the long run. . . depending on how its used.
 
apdst said:
Don't change, bro. :lamo
Click to expand...

You haven't, which is how you got your reputation. Funny, the lengths you will go to not answer a question.
 
faithful_servant said:
No one else will answer my question -how about you...

Now then, since this does have the appearance of something sketchy (not saying that it is, just that it looks like it), would you support an investigation into the full chain of messages to determine of this is a case of FBI agents suppressing an investigation?
Click to expand...

I'll answer your question since you think it's so important.
That text says honey don't go into to a meeting guns blazing unless you have facts to back it up because if she becomes president she'll remember you came at her 1/2 assed and you won't get another promotion.
Make sure all your ducks are in a row.

That's my take on it. Investigators don't get information from interviews with suspects they either get confirmation of information they already have or get the person to perjure themselves.
There is nothing fishy in that text for someone not blinded by the bull**** of right wing media.
 
Here's another Strzok text that fits the thread title:

strzok-text-sept-10-2016.jpg
 
Mycroft said:
Here's another Strzok text that fits the thread title:

67227703d1517052866-text-message-alone-warrants-investigation-strzok-text-sept-10-2016-jpg
Click to expand...

So, we'll just have to find out who Jim, Trisha, Dave and Mike are. I suspect they were also part of the FBI's 'Qustionables' squad.
 
eohrnberger said:
So, we'll just have to find out who Jim, Trisha, Dave and Mike are. I suspect they were also part of the FBI's 'Qustionables' squad.
Click to expand...

Someone has been thinking about those names...

“Jim” is likely James Baker, the Chief Legal Counsel for FBI Director James Comey.

“Trish” is likely Trisha Beth Anderson, Office of Legal Counsel for the FBI. [Anderson was hired for the DOJ, by AG Eric Holder, from Eric Holder’s law firm.]

“Dave” and “Mike” currently remain unknown.

https://theconservativetreehouse.co...hlights-fbi-investigative-intent/#more-145090
Click to expand...

In any case, Grassley is the one looking at these Strzok texts. He's the one sending letters all over the place asking various people to send him everything they have.

It's just a matter of time, that's all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom