You two, and many others I assume, can deny all you want, but it is fairly apparent to anyone paying the slightest bit of attention that the Hillary email investigation and conclusion was the conclusion sought rather than the conclusion supported by the evidence and the facts of the case.
- From the very beginning, when Lynch ordered that it be called 'a matter' rather than what it was, namely an investigation. What? Did the FBI suddenly become the 'Federal Bureau of Matters' ?
- Altering the memo removing and replacing criminal terms with non criminal ones before the investigation was completed under pins it, and goes to patter and shoddy work by those involved.
- This exoneration memo written before even the investigation was concluded. Before the principals were even interviewed.
- The two, or more, pro-Hillary FBI agents and their text messages go to pattern and raise suspicion.
- The intent of 'going light' on Hillary, rather than 'loaded for bear', which most any other subject would be subjected to.
- Their talk of insurance policy in 'Andy's office' implicate Andrew McCabe as being in on it.
- The long litany of criminal acts that Comey cited in his own presser only to overstep his role and assert "No reasonable prosecutor"; is he a prosecutor? The last time I checked, the director FBI was a prosecutor. Don't actual prosecutors have a say in the matter?
There's no leg left to stand on here, to claim that there isn't corruption and obstruction of justice by these people and the actions that they've taken.
There's no leg left to stand on here, to claim that Hillary's email investigation was proper and well done, and that justice was served.
It needs to be done over, and done correct and proper this time.
You can poo poo it all you want, you can berate belittle and shout names; throw your temper tantrums all you want, but all that doesn't change any of the facts listed above.
